This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
m/k mick milton keynes 12 Feb 23 7.50pm | |
---|---|
For my penny’s worth, for one weekend I absolutely love VAR, kept a smile on my face, masked a poor performance for us, they were good, but the sound of “who are ya “ being returned with interest, loved it
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 12 Feb 23 8.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by m/k mick
For my penny’s worth, for one weekend I absolutely love VAR, kept a smile on my face, masked a poor performance for us, they were good, but the sound of “who are ya “ being returned with interest, loved it It went our way this week for sure and yes the 'who are ya' was the highlight of the 'banter'
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CPFC1965 Warrington 13 Feb 23 12.38am | |
---|---|
VAR will produce a level playing field, BUT it's run by idiots with no computer training
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 13 Feb 23 7.57am | |
---|---|
The interfering with play thing has always been something that irks me - clearly if an attacking player is on the field of play in the opponent's half then he is interfering with play, either directly to receive the ball or indirectly by running interference, giving the player with the ball an option or hoping for a rebound - in any event the defending team has to make efforts to nullify this attacking threat or option - To me there is some allowance that could be made where an attacker is laying on the floor with injury sustained from a previous attack, provided that player isn't laying in such a position to influence the attack, i.e inside the 6 yard box. Clarify the rules & get rid of the subjectivity of is he interfering with play or not - Originally posted by Willo
Even then there is the issue of Interfering or not interfering etc etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OneWayTicketToMars Selsdon 13 Feb 23 10.22am | |
---|---|
I like the idea that VAR evens itself out for all the clubs.
Record crowd 51,482 - The Whitehorse was rocking - Second Div Champs 1978 - 79 ... 'wot a night ! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 13 Feb 23 10.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OneWayTicketToMars
I like the idea that VAR evens itself out for all the clubs. In essence, it has just alleviated the 'on the day' vitriol referees would be individually subject to. We now just have criticism and ire aimed at a collective of them safely tucked away somewhere for failing to do their job properly. The point of VAR was to remove subjectivity and make clearly evidenced, objective decisions. Them not even being able to do that with the technology has only reinforced general opinions of them and perhaps justified for many, their hate over the years. This weekend saw an inability to call offsides, understand what constitutes a red card and confusion as to whether an outfield player can use their arm to stop a shot destined for goal. Personally, I think we should have some type of 'Wheel of Fortune' spinning device to determine decisions. There'd probably be a greater percentage of correct calls plus far more entertainment.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Feb 23 10.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
In essence, it has just alleviated the 'on the day' vitriol referees would be individually subject to. We now just have criticism and ire aimed at a collective of them safely tucked away somewhere for failing to do their job properly. The point of VAR was to remove subjectivity and make clearly evidenced, objective decisions. Them not even being able to do that with the technology has only reinforced general opinions of them and perhaps justified for many, their hate over the years. This weekend saw an inability to call offsides, understand what constitutes a red card and confusion as to whether an outfield player can use their arm to stop a shot destined for goal. Personally, I think we should have some type of 'Wheel of Fortune' spinning device to determine decisions. There'd probably be a greater percentage of correct calls plus far more entertainment. There has always been the "Clear and obvious error" factor, accordingly it has always been known that subjectivity would enter the equation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 13 Feb 23 10.50am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
There has always been the "Clear and obvious error" factor, accordingly it has always been known that subjectivity would enter the equation. So offsides and handballs are subjective opinions now?
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 13 Feb 23 10.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
In essence, it has just alleviated the 'on the day' vitriol referees would be individually subject to. We now just have criticism and ire aimed at a collective of them safely tucked away somewhere for failing to do their job properly. The point of VAR was to remove subjectivity and make clearly evidenced, objective decisions. Them not even being able to do that with the technology has only reinforced general opinions of them and perhaps justified for many, their hate over the years. This weekend saw an inability to call offsides, understand what constitutes a red card and confusion as to whether an outfield player can use their arm to stop a shot destined for goal. Personally, I think we should have some type of 'Wheel of Fortune' spinning device to determine decisions. There'd probably be a greater percentage of correct calls plus far more entertainment. After every round of games, referees errors / judgement calls would be discussed. Now we have supplemented that with erroneous VAR calls. In a couple of the cases at the weekend, including the one in our game, citing '' human error '' is not enough. It was negligence.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Feb 23 10.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
So offsides and handballs are subjective opinions now? Subjectivity does not generally enter the equation in terms of offside decisions. Some handballs are clear-cut decisions but there can be some which are not and of course "Clear and obvious error" enters the equation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 13 Feb 23 11.31am | |
---|---|
I assume that's you casting your vote or 'thumb' on BBC Willo in response to whoever sent in this? Attachment: Screenshot (33).png (85.22Kb)
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Feb 23 11.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I assume that's you casting your vote or 'thumb' on BBC Willo in response to whoever sent in this? Heavens above! I don't wish to be associated with the Woke/PC BBC, I cannot abide that organisation. Have to pay a licence fee for that hogwash.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.