You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Scumbag w***er
November 21 2024 5.33pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Scumbag w***er

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Aug 22 4.39pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by The groover

The killer is 44.

That would be the guy in the photo in my opinion. If you look again, he was wearing gloves - out to kill - radical.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 19 Aug 22 9.08am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Bloke been named and picture released.

Absolute failure and piece of s#!t as can be expected, had already served 12 years for robbery.

Interestingly, I did not see one overtly racist Tweet on Twitter which was slightly promising however I did see more than one tweet slamming 'racists' for using this as an excuse. Shocking incite into culture these days of people so ready to fight something which has not yet come to life that they are willing to completely forgo any acknowledgement let alone sentiment regarding something so horrific. Should be grounds for sterilisation and internment.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 19 Aug 22 9.09am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Lee Byer , 44.

[Link]

Edited by PalazioVecchio (19 Aug 2022 9.12am)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 19 Aug 22 9.41am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Another example of the public being denied democracy. We have no chance of being offered a vote on capital punishment if we had back in the sixties I doubt it would have been abolished.

Still the MPs are honorable and know what's best for the country, let's face it since capital punishment was abolished it's not like the crime and murder rate has gone up.

That is generally considered crap Badger. Like the dewy eyed view of the home front in the war being all stiff upper lip and carry on. It was a crime fest with forced child prostitution rife, murders a plenty, coppers bent as a pipe and gangs running the show. And the blitz.

What has gone up is reporting, data gathering and the size of the population.

Back on topic, if I was his family I would happily kill the bloke who did this. Fortunately, we live in a civilized country and should look back with genuine embarrassment at a time when the state carried out some misplaced act of vengeance.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 19 Aug 22 2.27pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

That is generally considered crap Badger. Like the dewy eyed view of the home front in the war being all stiff upper lip and carry on. It was a crime fest with forced child prostitution rife, murders a plenty, coppers bent as a pipe and gangs running the show. And the blitz.

What has gone up is reporting, data gathering and the size of the population.

Back on topic, if I was his family I would happily kill the bloke who did this. Fortunately, we live in a civilized country and should look back with genuine embarrassment at a time when the state carried out some misplaced act of vengeance.

There were undoubtedly innocent men executed in the past, however, far more people have been killed by released murderers reoffending. I see nothing wrong with the death penalty being available to the judge but it should not be mandatory.

Edited by georgenorman (19 Aug 2022 2.28pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 19 Aug 22 2.53pm

Originally posted by silvertop

That is generally considered crap Badger. Like the dewy eyed view of the home front in the war being all stiff upper lip and carry on. It was a crime fest with forced child prostitution rife, murders a plenty, coppers bent as a pipe and gangs running the show. And the blitz.

What has gone up is reporting, data gathering and the size of the population.

Back on topic, if I was his family I would happily kill the bloke who did this. Fortunately, we live in a civilized country and should look back with genuine embarrassment at a time when the state carried out some misplaced act of vengeance.

Imagine seriously believing that.

It's like believing 400,000 British men died for diversity and inclusion.

Also, like believing you could get 400,000 road men to fight for this country today.


Edited by W12 (19 Aug 2022 2.53pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
JRW2 Flag Dulwich 19 Aug 22 3.17pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

There were undoubtedly innocent men executed in the past, however, far more people have been killed by released murderers reoffending. I see nothing wrong with the death penalty being available to the judge but it should not be mandatory.

Edited by georgenorman (19 Aug 2022 2.28pm)

Yes, and set against that simple but horrible fact all other considerations in the debate over capital punishment are irrelevant. It should not be available to the courts.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
JRW2 Flag Dulwich 19 Aug 22 3.20pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by The groover

The killer is 44.

We don't know anything at all about the killer. All we know is that a photo of the suspected killer is available and that the person in that photo has been charged - not convicted.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 19 Aug 22 3.26pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Yes, and set against that simple but horrible fact all other considerations in the debate over capital punishment are irrelevant. It should not be available to the courts.

What about those killed by released murderers? What about the guilty found not guilty because the jury didn't want them to hang. The judge would determine if guilt was clear enough and the murders henious enough to warrant the death penalty.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
JRW2 Flag Dulwich 19 Aug 22 3.44pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

What about those killed by released murderers? What about the guilty found not guilty because the jury didn't want them to hang. The judge would determine if guilt was clear enough and the murders henious enough to warrant the death penalty.

Crikey. Trial by jury - made up of twelve of our peers - is one of the great bulwarks of our democracy. If judges are to be allowed to overrule juries' verdicts, juries might as well be abolished, or we could go back to the good old says of "Bloody" Judge Jeffreys in the 17th century, who bullied juries into complying with his own prejudices.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 19 Aug 22 4.58pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Crikey. Trial by jury - made up of twelve of our peers - is one of the great bulwarks of our democracy. If judges are to be allowed to overrule juries' verdicts, juries might as well be abolished, or we could go back to the good old says of "Bloody" Judge Jeffreys in the 17th century, who bullied juries into complying with his own prejudices.

I'm not saying that judges should overrule a jury's verdict. I'm saying that when the death penalty was the only sentence for those found guilty of murder, juries would acquit if they had the slightest doubt or sympathy. The judge determining whether the death penalty is appropriate is what I am proposing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 19 Aug 22 5.25pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

Crikey. Trial by jury - made up of twelve of our peers - is one of the great bulwarks of our democracy. If judges are to be allowed to overrule juries' verdicts, juries might as well be abolished, or we could go back to the good old says of "Bloody" Judge Jeffreys in the 17th century, who bullied juries into complying with his own prejudices.

Not what he wrote. Judges would determine if the verdict was strong enough and the crime heinous enough.
Then it would go to a woke panel where the perpetrator would get a nice holiday, two hours of counciling, a new house and sent on their way with a benefit amount to make CP look poor

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Scumbag w***er