This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
silvertop Portishead 20 Nov 22 9.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
⁸ I keep hearing about this massive money backing the club.....Still, even when they finish refitting Selhurst we'll have a lower capacity than Leeds do now.....So, while I'm not ungrateful we aren't shooting for any stars here. Also, we have been very sensible in our transfers and invested in good up and coming players. However, it would be nice if some of this big player money resulted in a couple of stars coming here. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Nov 2022 10.11pm) Selhurst is a very slow work in progress. Restricted by a far from supportive local authority, a hostile local community and sensible prudent management. It will be a proper size but I'm questioning whether I will live to see it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 20 Nov 22 9.17am | |
---|---|
For sure its easy to forget that there are plenty of clubs in the footballing pyramid that are a lot worse off than us. Originally posted by Badger11
I read IntotheValley their fan forum. They are complaining on there that Danish Dave has cut back spending on the various youth teams, so parents have to wash their own kit, there is not enough kit etc. Charlton have a good track record of bringing young players through so this is an opportunity to do some poaching, they are not happy at the Valley.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 20 Nov 22 9.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
Why, and like whom? I think the club should aim for a wage structure that avoids the travesty of the likes of Benteke, another player hyped up to be that which he is not and with a crazy wage to match. Also, realistically any true star performer won't be coming to Palace if there are other higher placed clubs involved offering more money. 100% correct
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Nov 22 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
Why, and like whom? I think the club should aim for a wage structure that avoids the travesty of the likes of Benteke, another player hyped up to be that which he is not and with a crazy wage to match. Also, realistically any true star performer won't be coming to Palace if there are other higher placed clubs involved offering more money. Well apparently we have big money backing us. How is that different to Man City for example? As for whom, I'm hardly a scout. What I would like is some clarity I suppose.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Nov 22 12.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Selhurst is a very slow work in progress. Restricted by a far from supportive local authority, a hostile local community and sensible prudent management. It will be a proper size but I'm questioning whether I will live to see it. Well, let's hope you do and see many matches there.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 20 Nov 22 1.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
A friend of my kid brother is in some way connected with the youth set up at Charlton (I think he is assistant to the manager of one of the younger teams, 8 / 9 10 year olds) anyway he was complaining that if a London based kid shows lots of potential at that age there is a real struggle to keep them at Charlton because of the money from PL top 6 clubs, then the draw of the new Palace academy, yes he specifically mentioned the Palace academy as becoming a major headache because when Parents bring their kids to Palace, they get a good vibe from the tour, the set up, the senior coaches at the Academy & the possibilities of a route to the first team & more recently the experience's of Plange, getting moved out to other clubs in the same football family, so for sure its having the desired effect further down the tree - as the years go by if it continues to be managed properly for sure both the academy & this multi club set up could be the pathway to a brighter future for Palace -
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 20 Nov 22 3.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I keep hearing about this massive money backing the club.....Still, even when they finish refitting Selhurst we'll have a lower capacity than Leeds do now.....So, while I'm not ungrateful we aren't shooting for any stars here. Also, we have been very sensible in our transfers and invested in good up and coming players. However, it would be nice if some of this big player money resulted in a couple of stars coming here. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Nov 2022 10.11pm) Define '' massive '' ! My definition would be in the City, Newcastle state owned bracket, and the likes of Chelsea. We have had a lot of money invested into the club but it's still not on a par with, for example, Bloom's bankrolling of Brighton or the Dildo Brothers at West Ham. Elland Road is not in the middle of a built up area. We are limited with what we can do at Selhurst Park. The proposed new stand will certainly increase corporate revenue and enable an improvement on what is currently on offer. As for signing so called stars, history tells us that it doesn't usually work out for Palace - Benteke and Sakho being recent examples. And I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you think the club is sitting on a vast amount of transfer money.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Nov 22 3.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Define '' massive '' ! My definition would be in the City, Newcastle state owned bracket, and the likes of Chelsea. We have had a lot of money invested into the club but it's still not on a par with, for example, Bloom's bankrolling of Brighton or the Dildo Brothers at West Ham. Elland Road is not in the middle of a built up area. We are limited with what we can do at Selhurst Park. The proposed new stand will certainly increase corporate revenue and enable an improvement on what is currently on offer. As for signing so called stars, history tells us that it doesn't usually work out for Palace - Benteke and Sakho being recent examples. And I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you think the club is sitting on a vast amount of transfer money. I appreciate your input on the relative financial situation as it's hard to get a real gauge on it.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 20 Nov 22 5.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Especially if you're stealing the cream of youngsters from other set ups.....probably should call it the 'Beckham system'.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 03 Dec 22 6.12pm | |
---|---|
Surprise no one has picked up on this. It's in other media as well.
There are 2 issues with this as I understand it. 1. Rather than saying transferring ownership of CP it would be more accurate to say selling his ownership as the new holding company has other shareholders apart from him and they would then have a say in CP. Who are these people and are they good for us. 2. By selling his ownership and using it as surety for the purchase of OL essentially he is putting CP on the hook for his debit with OL. So if OL went bust CP shares would be part of the assets that the administrator would be looking to maximize. I don't like this idea of multiple ownership and I have mentioned this many times. I hope the other shareholders squash the idea.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 03 Dec 22 6.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Surprise no one has picked up on this. It's in other media as well.
There are 2 issues with this as I understand it. 1. Rather than saying transferring ownership of CP it would be more accurate to say selling his ownership as the new holding company has other shareholders apart from him and they would then have a say in CP. Who are these people and are they good for us. 2. By selling his ownership and using it as surety for the purchase of OL essentially he is putting CP on the hook for his debit with OL. So if OL went bust CP shares would be part of the assets that the administrator would be looking to maximize. I don't like this idea of multiple ownership and I have mentioned this many times. I hope the other shareholders squash the idea. I get the feeling albeit a gut feeling that there is an element of 'Emperors new clothes' about Textor
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 03 Dec 22 6.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I get the feeling albeit a gut feeling that there is an element of 'Emperors new clothes' about Textor You and me.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.