that's a rather boring rant, even by your standards.

Getting back to the OP, i reckon Neil Oliver has committed career 'Hara-kiri' by expressing his opinions.

It seems that many people won't believe anything is truth until they actually see it on the BBC.

Nevertheless, it is good to see GB News putting 'counter-narrative' information out on mainstream media television.

Shame it's more than two years too late (accepting that GB News only started on air in mid 2021).

Surprised they don't get told off by Ofcom. Maybe they are waiting for the Online Harms bill to become law? I suspect most readers here believe that that bill is about protecting children from paedophiles? That's how they are spinning the impending massive jump in censorship that it will introduce. One of four recent "enabling acts", of which two are already passed into law.

Of course, you have to ask yourselves why GB News are allowed to say such things when everything, information-wise, has been so tightly controlled for the past 27 months. They even talk about Vaccine Adverse Events and the lack of compensation for people with Covid jab injuries.

As for it all being conspiracy theory. It's no theory. You can investigate the World Economic Forum for yourselves.

You can also watch UK Column News, livestreamed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 1pm and all episodes available on demand immediately thereafter at [Link] [link goes to UK Column dot Org] to learn what devious things go on in the bowels of UK parliament and are covered up by the BBC.

"Another conspiracy theory", I hear you shout. But realistically, anyone who thinks the BBC give them news and doesn't understand that it is purely whatever propaganda the state want pushed out, is deliberately looking in the wrong direction. Or simply under the spell of the delusion that we are living in a liberal democracy with a benevolent government. I don't blame you, I used to think the same once upon a time. We all did.

Anyone who is starting to question the propaganda from the BBC (and I don't just mean all the woke, extreme left-wing bollocks) could do a lot worse than watch a few episodes of UK Column News.

The truth is all out there, a lot of it hiding in plain sight.

Edited by The_Aviator (08 Jun 2022 8.20pm)

"Regulatory capture".

A well-chosen phrase, which I applaud the use of. See also "revolving doors" (whilst looking at Vallance & Whitty).

The entire MHRA too are, basically, shills for Big Pharma. Apologists for gangsters, in effect.

Regulatory capture doesn't only happen in the regulation of medicine and broadcasting (although I'm not sure Ofcom was ever free of it and was probably set up in the first place to police the propaganda output of the mainstream broadcast media).

Don't believe regulatory capture is actually a thing?

Take a look at Boeing and the FAA having allowed them to self-certificate the changes made to their new (at the time) Boeing 737 MAX versus the earlier variants of the airframe. Bigger engines requiring a re-design to cope. But that would have made it a different airframe, and would have needed $ billions in re-certification costs. Instead they installed some clever trickery in the flight computers to make them handle and feel (to the pilots) like the earlier versions.

What's wrong with that I hear you ask?

Well, Boeing did it on the cheap and self-certificated a single sensor instead of a fail-active dual sensor arrangement. Lots of people knew about the flaws in this and raised them at various levels but were overruled within both Boeing and the FAA.

The result was that two airframes crashed because the pilots didn't know how to identify the fault, let alone recover from it, and 346 people died as a result. And apart from the entire fleet of 737 MAX a/c being grounded for ages, with eventual modifications to the dual sensor arrangement, nothing in respect of how the FAA oversees Boeing has changed.

This isn't conspiracy theory. It's verifiable fact. Even Wikipedia will tell you about these events and the fact that Boeing paid out .5 billion in compensation. But that's a drop in the ocean compared to their overall profits, partly derived from cutting corners as described here, and partly from selling weapons to kill poor f***ers in other countries.

They simply don't care about you or me. Or any other collateral damage... as long as their profit-making machine rolls on.

Going back to Covid; how many took the jabs because they believed that the benevolent 'free western' government cared about their health?

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH.

If they cared about your health, there wouldn't be 6.5 million on the waiting list for the NHS before Covid (the same, or worse now).

There wouldn't be 6.5 million on the waiting list for NHS operations while we are sending £2.6 billion worth of aid (mostly weapons) to Ukraine. [Link] [link is to Reuters on the issue.] How far would that go towards health cover? Not that far actually, but it would help.

Sorry to break it to people, but they really don't care about your health. Or even your life.

I wish he would lose the affected cravate thing he wears

My point was in reply to the poster about them not giving a crap about our lives and health. Then read my reply. Do we care more about others?