This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
cryrst The garden of England 28 Jul 21 7.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by croydon proud
Yes, I get you mate, the banker thing was stuck in my head, it was more about the bailout , something I hadn"t mentioned, and that was new Labour I know.Its like, get a great paying stressful job, take the mahessive bonus every 12 months, if it goes tits up, let everyone else in the country bail us out, continue in job, get great bonus! A bit like the member for Medway, jacking in his plumbing/boiler inspecting business, and going gambling with his savings. He gets lucky and wins, wins again, buys a big house and new motor, he"s a success, legend in fact! Then he piles it all on a sure thing, only the horse didn"t fancy it and he lost the lot. Then he cries to the tax paying public and they give him his money back, it was his risk, why should his neighbours pay? I've been at the bottom CP. In front of a judge who repossed my flat. Me Mrs and kid in temporary accommodation. Beans on toast for a week. No one helped me. Oh I got a £20 crisis loan after 3 visits to the council. That got paid back 11 years later to the tune of £35. Edited by cryrst (28 Jul 2021 7.16pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 28 Jul 21 7.33pm | |
---|---|
I think it always was hard to own your own home and sacrifices had to be made. Before the war only the rich could afford it. Growing up in the sixties and seventies my parents still couldn't afford it and we had a credit squeeze. You had to make nice to the building society manager who was only allowed to make a certain number of loans per month. So even if you had the deposit you were on a waiting list. The 80 / 90's was the time when we had easy credit so providing you hadn't lost your job it was boom time. Today we are back to the norm you need a large deposit and proof you can pay your mortgage. In hindsight selling off council houses was a terrible idea because essentially the taxpayer was subsiding a few lucky people whilst removing the opportunity for others to rent. We need to completely rethink the housing market. In Europe most people rent which is controlled and a long term deal. We have huge pension funds who with the right incentives could become responsible landlords. It wouldn't cost the taxpayer either. In Austria most domestic property is owned by the bank they get a guaranteed long term income and the citizens have an affordable place to leave. Property speculation should come with a tax to discourage, overseas investors should be banned etc. I think if Labour wake up and propose a European style housing rental market this could be a real vote winner.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 28 Jul 21 7.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
I've been at the bottom CP. In front of a judge who repossed my flat. Me Mrs and kid in temporary accommodation. Beans on toast for a week. No one helped me. Oh I got a £20 crisis loan after 3 visits to the council. That got paid back 11 years later to the tune of £35. Edited by cryrst (28 Jul 2021 7.16pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 28 Jul 21 7.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think it always was hard to own your own home and sacrifices had to be made. Before the war only the rich could afford it. Growing up in the sixties and seventies my parents still couldn't afford it and we had a credit squeeze. You had to make nice to the building society manager who was only allowed to make a certain number of loans per month. So even if you had the deposit you were on a waiting list. The 80 / 90's was the time when we had easy credit so providing you hadn't lost your job it was boom time. Today we are back to the norm you need a large deposit and proof you can pay your mortgage. In hindsight selling off council houses was a terrible idea because essentially the taxpayer was subsiding a few lucky people whilst removing the opportunity for others to rent. We need to completely rethink the housing market. In Europe most people rent which is controlled and a long term deal. We have huge pension funds who with the right incentives could become responsible landlords. It wouldn't cost the taxpayer either. In Austria most domestic property is owned by the bank they get a guaranteed long term income and the citizens have an affordable place to leave. Property speculation should come with a tax to discourage, overseas investors should be banned etc. I think if Labour wake up and propose a European style housing rental market this could be a real vote winner. Sounds a plan Badger, somethings got to give, unless we get used to the more family orientated approach with kids living at home with grandkids and parents, house with granny flat, extensions at side and back, and apartment in roof, not knocking it btw!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 28 Jul 21 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Do we have some of the most expensive public transport in the World ? and does that drive up prices close to central London ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Jul 21 7.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think it always was hard to own your own home and sacrifices had to be made. Before the war only the rich could afford it. Growing up in the sixties and seventies my parents still couldn't afford it and we had a credit squeeze. You had to make nice to the building society manager who was only allowed to make a certain number of loans per month. So even if you had the deposit you were on a waiting list. The 80 / 90's was the time when we had easy credit so providing you hadn't lost your job it was boom time. Today we are back to the norm you need a large deposit and proof you can pay your mortgage. In hindsight selling off council houses was a terrible idea because essentially the taxpayer was subsiding a few lucky people whilst removing the opportunity for others to rent. We need to completely rethink the housing market. In Europe most people rent which is controlled and a long term deal. We have huge pension funds who with the right incentives could become responsible landlords. It wouldn't cost the taxpayer either. In Austria most domestic property is owned by the bank they get a guaranteed long term income and the citizens have an affordable place to leave. Property speculation should come with a tax to discourage, overseas investors should be banned etc. I think if Labour wake up and propose a European style housing rental market this could be a real vote winner. Only a dishonest person would disagree with this post. Plenty in property would agree with this logic but of course there are also many stubborn people who don’t want to know what others think or experience.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Jul 21 10.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
OK not what you want, what you need is probably more true. Mortgages are now available over 50 years with the ability to pay a bit extra each year which reduces the term. That has compensated in some way. Most people have an equal opportunity to be the best they can and get in front of the next person. You do need a little luck as well but you can make your own. If you don't take the opportunity given then who can be blamed. You cherry picked 9 words from over a hundred. Does nothing else I wrote ring true in the slightest. I just fundamentally disagree - your story about being repossessed and turning it round is genuinely admirable and I have a lot of respect for you because of it, but the fact you were able to do it doesn't mean it's right. I've been lucky enough to buy my first house this year, a lot earlier than most of my peers, but that was only possible with me and my Mrs both earning above average and working stupidly long hours - just because I've managed to achieve it, it doesn't mean I think it's right that it is that difficult. I've genuinely no idea how you'd even get close on one salary. The game is fixed, and whilst there is a lot of value in graft and hand work, the narrative that it's all you need to 'succeed' is a complete fantasy and very damaging, in my opinion.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Jul 21 10.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think it always was hard to own your own home and sacrifices had to be made. Before the war only the rich could afford it. Growing up in the sixties and seventies my parents still couldn't afford it and we had a credit squeeze. You had to make nice to the building society manager who was only allowed to make a certain number of loans per month. So even if you had the deposit you were on a waiting list. The 80 / 90's was the time when we had easy credit so providing you hadn't lost your job it was boom time. Today we are back to the norm you need a large deposit and proof you can pay your mortgage. In hindsight selling off council houses was a terrible idea because essentially the taxpayer was subsiding a few lucky people whilst removing the opportunity for others to rent. We need to completely rethink the housing market. In Europe most people rent which is controlled and a long term deal. We have huge pension funds who with the right incentives could become responsible landlords. It wouldn't cost the taxpayer either. In Austria most domestic property is owned by the bank they get a guaranteed long term income and the citizens have an affordable place to leave. Property speculation should come with a tax to discourage, overseas investors should be banned etc. I think if Labour wake up and propose a European style housing rental market this could be a real vote winner. In broad terms, yes, but it's not really acknowledging any detail - deposits are considerably higher, even in real terms, and the level of proof required considerably more. In 1950s, average household income was around £9k per anuum, and average property price was around £2k. 1960s; average household income around £11k, average property price around £4k. Average household income now is around £30k, and average property price is ~£250k.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 29 Jul 21 11.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think it always was hard to own your own home and sacrifices had to be made. Before the war only the rich could afford it. Growing up in the sixties and seventies my parents still couldn't afford it and we had a credit squeeze. You had to make nice to the building society manager who was only allowed to make a certain number of loans per month. So even if you had the deposit you were on a waiting list. The 80 / 90's was the time when we had easy credit so providing you hadn't lost your job it was boom time. Today we are back to the norm you need a large deposit and proof you can pay your mortgage. In hindsight selling off council houses was a terrible idea because essentially the taxpayer was subsiding a few lucky people whilst removing the opportunity for others to rent. We need to completely rethink the housing market. In Europe most people rent which is controlled and a long term deal. We have huge pension funds who with the right incentives could become responsible landlords. It wouldn't cost the taxpayer either. In Austria most domestic property is owned by the bank they get a guaranteed long term income and the citizens have an affordable place to leave. Property speculation should come with a tax to discourage, overseas investors should be banned etc. I think if Labour wake up and propose a European style housing rental market this could be a real vote winner. You make a good point. You wonder why we can't properly legislate for private renting. Loads of other countries do. It would not be making landlords lose, rather they would just make slightly less profit. Both Britain and Ireland have this issue. The longest lease is six months at twice or three times the price of a mortgage. Edited by ASCPFC (29 Jul 2021 11.31am)
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 29 Jul 21 11.45am | |
---|---|
EverybodyDannsNow makes lots of undeniable good points and the current way is going to collapse harder when it inevitably does again. New Labour and various Tory PM’s have failed badly on housing. It really started to get out of control nearly 20 years ago, just as Phil and Kirstie etc were on the tv every single night and became part of conversation and humour for some, although accumulating and letting got going several years before, and of course interest only mortgages.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 29 Jul 21 1.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
EverybodyDannsNow makes lots of undeniable good points and the current way is going to collapse harder when it inevitably does again. New Labour and various Tory PM’s have failed badly on housing. It really started to get out of control nearly 20 years ago, just as Phil and Kirstie etc were on the tv every single night and became part of conversation and humour for some, although accumulating and letting got going several years before, and of course interest only mortgages. The unfortunate reality is neither party have an interest in solving the problem, as the property market is such a huge contributor to the economy, and they'll never make as much from locals as they do from the foreign money coming in. Honestly, I've no idea how you solve it, but clearly it is a broken system.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 29 Jul 21 1.10pm | |
---|---|
I totally agree with long term rentals with Banks or other such organisations being the Landlords.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.