This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 22 Oct 20 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
...and i'm afraid the majority of posts you make are about the government and how much you hate them. I wasn't making a point about the government I was making a point that its easy for multi millionaires to throw their hat in the ring and support worthy causes, but true generosity comes from providing that support directly and I came up with a way of supporting that cause with a little tax relief.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 22 Oct 20 1.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Surely it's not the governments job to do everything for the parents? A schools primary duty is to educate children. Maybe just leave them to focus on that.
Quite right. We should certainly go back to how it was in 1905. Namby pamby modern families claiming they need help. Let them eat cake.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 22 Oct 20 1.53pm | |
---|---|
10 years of Tory rule and we've finally reached a point where we're debating whether or not we should feed poor children. It was only a matter of time!
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 22 Oct 20 1.53pm | |
---|---|
Whether through poverty or feckless parenting there are little kids not getting a square meal on a daily basis.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 22 Oct 20 1.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
So we can get the footballers to pay for hungry kids, maybe pop stars can pay for victims of domestic abuse, cricketers can pay for housing the homeless and the government can spend the savings on giving billionaires another tax break? No, cricketers don’t get paid enough but I’d go for pop stars chipping in. Everyone needs to help and the wealthy need to get involved. They never will of course on this sort of scale as the majority are all way too selfish with their money even though they could never spenc it in 10 generations. You get me wrong if you think I agree with the government voting down the suggestion because I don’t. We also need a plan in place to start repaying the money we constantly borrow and that needs to start at the top of the tree and not midway down which I fear will be what actually happens.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 22 Oct 20 2.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
10 years of Tory rule and we've finally reached a point where we're debating whether or not we should feed poor children. It was only a matter of time! Successive Governments - Labour more than most - have encouraged young people to have children they could ill afford to have.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Oct 20 2.09pm | |
---|---|
With Labour in power obviously we would not be having this debate.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 22 Oct 20 2.10pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 22 Oct 20 2.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
With Labour in power obviously we would not be having this debate. With Labour in power - aka Mr Corbyn - our living nightmare would be far worse than it is now!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 22 Oct 20 2.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
10 years of Tory rule and we've finally reached a point where we're debating whether or not we should feed poor children. It was only a matter of time! The debate is who should feed the children in the school holidays. Something that's unprecedented. We've not had 10 years of Tory rule. We've had less than a year of a Tory government. The previous one was 10 years are made up of about 3 years worth of Tory rule and 7 of coalitions. The Labour leadership has been completely inept over most of the last decade. 10 years ago the Tories couldn't even win an election even though Labour had made a complete balls up of the economy. Perhaps be angry at the people who voted for Ed instead of David, then wouldn't chuck Corbyn out of the party despite being told time and time again that the electorate hated him.... but it's easier to blame the Tory Government than to take accountability.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 22 Oct 20 2.27pm | |
---|---|
Yes - had DM and not EM been voted in politics may look very different today.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Oct 20 2.31pm | |
---|---|
Labour brought social justice and prosperity and senile tory voters can never forgive it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.