This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
the.universal 27 Aug 20 8.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by leejaneagles
A little while ago, a certain small streaming company named after the Rainforest decided it wanted to get into the world of Car shows. The BBC had the market completely sewn up and the most popular car show in history called Top Gear and they got so cocky they sacked the Hosts for a ‘refresh’ because obviously it was the show and the cars that brought in the viewers right, not the bumbling Hosts? An even littler while ago, last season in fact, this same streaming company with unlimited resources and most of the Country already signed up because of its parcel delivery service decided it wanted to get into the world of Football. It streamed flawless games, all games in fact, in a pick and choose your game environment that gave Viewers the freedom of choice and made Sky look very old hat with its rigid schedule. Anyone else connecting the dots here thinking we’ll see how popular ‘Sky Soccer Saturday’ is if there’s an Amazon stream of ‘Prime Football Saturday’ consisting of Jeff and the boys up against Sky’s no-name black, female and non-binary panel (please understand that if Jeff and the ‘boys’ happened to be black, gay and trans I’d want to watch them, this isn’t about that). Admittedly Top Gear was easier to sort as the person they sacked first was actually the Head Honcho Jeremy Clarkson whereas Sky have kept Jeff but he’s surely unhappy and I’m not sure Amazon would have too much an issue trebling his salary. Clarkson got sacked for sparking a producer ‘because there was no hot food’. No mention of refresh. If you don’t get sacked for punching a fellow employee the it’s hard to imagine what you would get sacked for. Grand tour is thought to have viewing figures on par with current Top Gear. So apart from bucketloads of cash, it doesn’t seem to be a great split for either parties.
Vive le Roy! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 27 Aug 20 8.41am | |
---|---|
If this had happened a year ago, I don't think it would have merited much discussion. Now there is debate around whether Sky have an ulterior motive behind what would historically have been seen as a programme refresh. Personal preference, but I won't miss Thompson or Nicholas but I do like Le Tiss. Interesting to see what happens next....
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Aug 20 9.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
If this had happened a year ago, I don't think it would have merited much discussion. Now there is debate around whether Sky have an ulterior motive behind what would historically have been seen as a programme refresh. Personal preference, but I won't miss Thompson or Nicholas but I do like Le Tiss. Interesting to see what happens next.... No prizes for guessing the types of people who will make up the panel. Can't have all these white males on there even though they have all played the game to a high level and bring perspective and insight to the table.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YoDougie London 27 Aug 20 9.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Sorry but I draw the line at sex change freaks. I also switch of to females from 14 year old male speed football. As much as Alex Scott is easy on the eye, she just points out what 99% of people have seen. I want to hear a view from a professional who reads deeper stuff than ‘he did great at...’ There really are things that men or women can’t do. It’s just nature. Trying to meddle in all of it is arrogant idiocy. This is truly such a disgusting and disappointing comment. Putting football aside, how can you possibly think it's acceptable to comment on people like this, using this language? Some of the comments on this thread have amazed me. Representation of all types of people is an important and much needed step to take in our inclusive society that moves towards equality. Also, women are not objects to comment on their looks and football is not 'human nature'. How you can possibly believe this is appropriate amazes me. Whatever the reason behind Sky's decision is, change does happen in work and the truth is, having 4/5 white men on the panel is not fair representation and is not where we have arrived at in 2020. As a 'white straight man', I'd welcome whoever they put on the show, as long as their qualifications and knowledge on the topic are good enough. I'm not going to 'draw the line' at anyone. People are who they are. Edited by YoDougie (27 Aug 2020 9.22am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
A89M Streatham 27 Aug 20 9.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
No prizes for guessing the types of people who will make up the panel. Can't have all these white males on there even though they have all played the game to a high level and bring perspective and insight to the table. Do they though? Apart from what i've mentioned about the nostalgia talk on BT. Do the Soccer Saturday lot actually add anything to your viewing experience? Other than the comfort of seeing them every saturday for god knows how long. Do you learn anything new? They just spew the same old rhetoric over and over again. Charlie and Phil are awful.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Aug 20 9.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by A89M
Do they though? Apart from what i've mentioned about the nostalgia talk on BT. Do the Soccer Saturday lot actually add anything to your viewing experience? Other than the comfort of seeing them every saturday for god knows how long. Do you learn anything new? They just spew the same old rhetoric over and over again. Charlie and Phil are awful. Our opinions are polarised on this matter. Esteemed pundits have been cast aside to pander to the PC Brigade. In my humble opinion 'Soccer Saturday' will be poorer for their absence and I can say with a great degree of confidence that I will certainly NOT be tuning in to watch it. Edited by Willo (27 Aug 2020 9.26am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 27 Aug 20 9.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YoDougie
This is truly such a disgusting and disappointing comment. Putting football aside, how can you possibly think it's acceptable to comment on people like this, using this language? Some of the comments on this thread have amazed me. Representation of all types of people is an important and much needed step to take in our inclusive society that moves towards equality. Also, women are not objects to comment on their looks and football is not 'human nature'. How you can possibly believe this is appropriate amazes me. Whatever the reason behind Sky's decision is, change does happen in work and the truth is, having 4/5 white men on the panel is not fair representation and is not where we have arrived at in 2020. As a 'white straight man', I'd welcome whoever they put on the show, as long as their qualifications and knowledge on the topic are good enough. I'm not going to 'draw the line' at anyone. People are who they are. Edited by YoDougie (27 Aug 2020 9.22am) People are who they are until their opinions differ apparently.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Aug 20 9.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YoDougie
This is truly such a disgusting and disappointing comment. Putting football aside, how can you possibly think it's acceptable to comment on people like this, using this language? Some of the comments on this thread have amazed me. Representation of all types of people is an important and much needed step to take in our inclusive society that moves towards equality. Also, women are not objects to comment on their looks and football is not 'human nature'. How you can possibly believe this is appropriate amazes me. Whatever the reason behind Sky's decision is, change does happen in work and the truth is, having 4/5 white men on the panel is not fair representation and is not where we have arrived at in 2020. As a 'white straight man', I'd welcome whoever they put on the show, as long as their qualifications and knowledge on the topic are good enough. I'm not going to 'draw the line' at anyone. People are who they are. Edited by YoDougie (27 Aug 2020 9.22am) Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Alex Scott brings nothing to the table. Mainly because she hasn’t played at the top level and at that speed because, guess why, she’s a woman. I’m not bothered who is on a programme or panel either but they’ve got to be qualified and have the presentation skills and charisma. I remember when Ruud Gullit came on the scene. Cool as. Thanks for your outrage and lesson in occupational thinking. I’ll file it under blithering bollox.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YoDougie London 27 Aug 20 10.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Alex Scott brings nothing to the table. Mainly because she hasn’t played at the top level and at that speed because, guess why, she’s a woman. I’m not bothered who is on a programme or panel either but they’ve got to be qualified and have the presentation skills and charisma. I remember when Ruud Gullit came on the scene. Cool as. Thanks for your outrage and lesson in occupational thinking. I’ll file it under blithering bollox. Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Yes I'm not sure if you're inferring that women can't do these jobs or not... but if you are saying they can't. You're talking about operating machinery and driving a truck. Of course they can.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 27 Aug 20 10.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Alex Scott brings nothing to the table. Mainly because she hasn’t played at the top level and at that speed because, guess why, she’s a woman. I’m not bothered who is on a programme or panel either but they’ve got to be qualified and have the presentation skills and charisma. I remember when Ruud Gullit came on the scene. Cool as. Thanks for your outrage and lesson in occupational thinking. I’ll file it under blithering bollox. Women can certainly do heavy manual work. My ex-wife was a decoy to a whaling fleet.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Aug 20 10.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YoDougie
Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Yes I'm not sure if you're inferring that women can't do these jobs or not... but if you are saying they can't. You're talking about operating machinery and driving a truck. Of course they can. They could, but they don’t, and don’t last more to the point. Operating heavy machinery is very wearing on the body, and I’m talking about big blokes. Women out late at night on their own in unlit and dodgy places with nobody around isn’t the place for a woman and again carrying dozens of boxes off vans and up stairs doesn’t get many women applying or staying in these kind of jobs if they do. Nature is nature. There are just some things that either sex aren’t good at or as good at or stick with. A bit like you trying to persuade me that your perfect view is now correct. Money and time and performance matter everywhere, and if you can’t keep up or deliver then it doesn’t last or happen in the first place. Save me the millennial drivel. You’ll actually find that loads of men now say it would be great if women did their job with them as well. But you’ll also hear them say they can’t stick at it because of body strength or ability to not get injured or physically tired to the point they can’t deliver the work or meet targets. Anyway, Matt Le Tissier gets the sack but Gary Lineker is BBC’s poster boy. Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Aug 2020 10.49am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leejaneagles 27 Aug 20 10.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Can women man heavy road digging machinery? Alex Scott brings nothing to the table. Mainly because she hasn’t played at the top level and at that speed because, guess why, she’s a woman. I’m not bothered who is on a programme or panel either but they’ve got to be qualified and have the presentation skills and charisma. I remember when Ruud Gullit came on the scene. Cool as. Thanks for your outrage and lesson in occupational thinking. I’ll file it under blithering bollox. The trouble is these days no one can have differing opinions. I'm in my early 30's and in certain pubs (not posh bars) and with people I'd consider 'close' friends and not acquaintances, if I openly put forward a slightly alternative opinion, people would stop talking to me or ask me to sit on my own and liken me to Hitler. Younger people these days are scared of debate or compromise, it's going to be a truly shocking World in a few years thanks to my Generation unfortunately. For what it's worth, I disagree with you on 'drawing the line' with Trans people. This is from personal experiences and knowing some. However, I don't agree it's not a mental/chemical imbalance. If a sex change remedies those symptoms it doesn't affect me in the slightest and I'm glad that person is feeling better. I just don't agree with the notion you can truly be a woman trapped in a mans body and vice-versa (but it wouldn't be a topic of discussion I'd feel compelled to have with them if I was with them). I'm just not fussed about sitting down for drinks or dinner with someone who has had this change and I don't find them revolting. It's completely okay that you are not okay with it and I'd have a drink with you as well. I'm sick of the people that spit their dummies out the pram though and berate you for a differing opinion. Don't get me started on non-binary. I'm not revolted by it or actively want to see people suffer but I couldn't hold a conversation with someone that idiotic. That really does smack of 'we've got all the rights we possibly want for gay people and trans people, lets make something up completely to keep moaning and be the shunned". And I know a lot of trans people that feel the same when it comes to the ridiculousness of a spoilt teenager wanting to wake up one morning as a boy and the next a girl and the next a lamp. Because it mocks the true struggle of the pain of feeling like you need to get your whole body permanently changed to feel okay in yourself. Getting told it's 2020 and that's not where we are now is also laughable. We are worse off than we've ever been and there is a divide and full tantrum/argument/riot over every tiny difference of opinion. Just a false feeling of superiority for blindly following every active equality cause but then abusing anybody that dares to be different. Not very equal that is it? Circling back to the topic, if they have a panel lined up better than the people sacked and they happened to all be minorities then I'd be fine wit that. We all know that won't be the case. Some people's opinion is the people fired are bumbling moronic buffoons (again your own opinion is fine) but ratings and reviews for Soccer Saturday suggest otherwise on the whole, so not sure why they've decided to pander for no reason. Time will tell.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.