When the officials re-watch the game to come to a decision about Zaha's behaviour they will also have to watch the challenge from Prowse that preceded it because he started his protest from that moment, if they do drop this so called ref as punishment for his amazing and astonishing performance during the whole game will they then take this into account when Zaha returns his plea.

You aint gonna like this TP, but, as it was a 2nd yellow the match official does NOT have to review his decision, let alone watch the whole/part of the match again. Also the FA are not interested in the 2 yellow/1red card, as they will only look at what followed, ie: Wilf refusing to leave the field of play.

The FA and their Officials are well well above the clouds, they spend their time pissing on little hopeless and helpless fans far far below who are running around flapping their arms in despair.

Good innit.

I stand 'Four square' behind all my previous comments.

I refrain from partaking in threads pertaining to referees and refereeing decisions as history has shown they disintegrate into wearisome Willo threads and I feel that in general the HOL posters have had enough of them and HOL is much the better for their absence.

Thought the same. Only possible explanation is that the booking was for dissent rather than simulation, but the tirade of abuse directed at the linesman surely warranted a red card in it's own right. Shame Willo has gone into his shell as I am sure he would explain that there is no inconsistency, as they are all forensically examined