This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Sakho and Sorloth
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 leejaneagles  02 Oct 18 11.58am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jway89
I must be in the minority that doesn't think that was a penalty. He raises his arm to block the run and catches him, but unless the ref can read Sakho's mind that he intended to do that, I really don't see that being a foul anywhere on the pitch THANK YOU! I thought I was going crazy. The key thing is the eyes. If he glances for 1 second then he's aiming to do it. His eyes are on the ball fully and when he runs he runs with arms to get momentum like ANYBODY. It looked like the Ref was desperate for a winner on the Monday night game. Sky probably had a word. There was nothing malicious in it whatsoever.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Deleted11 02 Oct 18 12.18pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by leejaneagles
THANK YOU! I thought I was going crazy. The key thing is the eyes. If he glances for 1 second then he's aiming to do it. His eyes are on the ball fully and when he runs he runs with arms to get momentum like ANYBODY. It looked like the Ref was desperate for a winner on the Monday night game. Sky probably had a word. There was nothing malicious in it whatsoever. Exactly. Why didn't the ref book whoever it was that Ake hit his head against? The problem is that the pundits just agreed it was a penalty. Pathetic
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  02 Oct 18 1.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I didn't see it but it sounded from the commentary as if it was stonewall. Then I realised that it wasn't a commentator speaking but a t***. (Sutton).
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 02 Oct 18 1.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
I didn't see it but it sounded from the commentary as if it was stonewall. Then I realised that it wasn't a commentator speaking but a t***. (Sutton). It was "stonewall" on Sky too and that wasn't Sutton
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 02 Oct 18 1.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
I didn't see it but it sounded from the commentary as if it was stonewall. Then I realised that it wasn't a commentator speaking but a t***. (Sutton). Hmmm. I can see why it was given. Let’s not forget that our equaliser was offside. Frustrating result, but we was not robbed.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 02 Oct 18 1.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
In my opinion Sakho's best performances were those when he was on loan to us. I don't think he's achieved that level since on a consistent basis. As for the penalty, as Roy said, the ref was entitled to give it as there was clear contact. And those Bournemouth boys need little encouragement when it comes to physical contact. Sorloth...it's a chicken and egg situation with him. Roy sees him every day in training - if he was delivering there then he would be earning the game time that some claim he needs to fully prove himself. From what I have seen, he's a long way short of the required standard.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
crvenaeagle  02 Oct 18 1.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Is it just me or does Sorloth always look scared and sad? As if the other boys are mean to him.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 02 Oct 18 1.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Norway
Give Sørloth a run in the team - no chanche to impress with odd ten minutes now and then. Alas, he's not good enough to impress anyone!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 02 Oct 18 1.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by leejaneagles
THANK YOU! I thought I was going crazy. The key thing is the eyes. If he glances for 1 second then he's aiming to do it. His eyes are on the ball fully and when he runs he runs with arms to get momentum like ANYBODY. It looked like the Ref was desperate for a winner on the Monday night game. Sky probably had a word. There was nothing malicious in it whatsoever. However you wanna spin it that was a 100% stonewall penalty all day long, if it had happened to Benteke it wouldnt have been given, but it was a very definate penalty, no excuses, Sakho should be fined for that, cost us a point AGAIN!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Pete53 Hassocks 02 Oct 18 1.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by gerry theagle
We need Benteke back ASAP, even a misfiring Benteke is street's ahead of Ayew and Sorloth. Who would have thought that after a few games absent (and when there was a general sigh of relief that injury would exclude him for a while) that we might be longing for the good ole days of Tekkers up front. I'm not sure I fully agree but we certainly haven't found an obvious alternative yet.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Dolphin 02 Oct 18 3.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by leejaneagles
THANK YOU! I thought I was going crazy. The key thing is the eyes. If he glances for 1 second then he's aiming to do it. His eyes are on the ball fully and when he runs he runs with arms to get momentum like ANYBODY. It looked like the Ref was desperate for a winner on the Monday night game. Sky probably had a word. There was nothing malicious in it whatsoever. Watch it again - he looks and then does it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 02 Oct 18 3.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
However you wanna spin it that was a 100% stonewall penalty all day long, if it had happened to Benteke it wouldnt have been given, but it was a very definate penalty, no excuses, Sakho should be fined for that, cost us a point AGAIN! I would say it was indefensible, but obviously not for some. The ref had just been over to have words with them so it wasn't even an out of the blue decision. Could've cost us 3 points as we were the side that looked more like winning at that moment.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.