You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > What price for Zaha would be too tempting?
November 24 2024 7.48am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

What price for Zaha would be too tempting?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

Bangell Flag Oxford 20 May 18 11.18am Send a Private Message to Bangell Add Bangell as a friend

£60/70 million would be a decent price right now, but if we sell Wilf for anything but a mind-blowing price, then we'll be going backwards as a club. We should be looking to grow as a team to meet Wilf's level, rather than letting him out-grow us, admitting we're not that good and letting him go.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Painter Flag Croydon 20 May 18 11.22am Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

The whole situation has changed from years ago, when we needed to sell to survive.
Now we don't need to sell our players, so why on earth would we sell our best player for any amount, we only then need to replace them with the money received. So whats the point in selling, unless he insists on going, then you have no choice.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 20 May 18 11.36am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Im glad Parish runs the club reading some of these posts feeling maybe we should sell Wilf. And I’ve been accused of Parish bashing (transfer deadline timing and expansive football decisions to be precise). Therefore I’m not in the slightest bit concerned until a massive club come in with an offer Wilf wants to accept and Parish is ok with the fee.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
sotac464 Flag Berkshire 20 May 18 11.51am Send a Private Message to sotac464 Add sotac464 as a friend

Played 10 w0 d0 l10.

That's how many games we played without Zaha in the team last season. He lifts the whole team when he plays and we are a match for any side.

So to us us he should be priceless unless we get an offer where we could rebuild the whole team. £200 million but no team is going to pay that. £60 million is paltry and we'll end up with has beens.

He lifts the fans the player's the manager every time he plays, whether he has a good game or not. He really is our Gerrard.

 


My equalibrium unbalanced me. Paul Draper Brighton 19/2/2018

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Crystal_Clear Flag Belfast 20 May 18 12.03pm Send a Private Message to Crystal_Clear Add Crystal_Clear as a friend

We simply cannot sell him, unless he refuses to play for us again (which won't happen anyway). Does make me laugh when the papers say Everton are interested in him. As if he would be interested in them.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 20 May 18 12.03pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by sotac464

Played 10 w0 d0 l10.

That's how many games we played without Zaha in the team last season. He lifts the whole team when he plays and we are a match for any side.

So to us us he should be priceless unless we get an offer where we could rebuild the whole team. £200 million but no team is going to pay that. £60 million is paltry and we'll end up with has beens.

He lifts the fans the player's the manager every time he plays, whether he has a good game or not. He really is our Gerrard.

We cannot of course prevent other clubs showing an interest in Zaha and submitting bids for him.

I happen to believe that IF we happen to accept a £60 Mill offer for Zaha and he decides to sample 'Pastures new, gladitorial hostility and more eruptions than Vesuvius will be aimed in the direction of Mr Parish.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 20 May 18 12.45pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Surprised people think of 60 millions for Wilf.

Absurd as it sounds that's paltry.

Wan Dyck for 75 millions to Liverpool - he is very good defender but so what.

We have to replace Delaney, Loftus-Cheek and Fosu for starters just to remain as of last match against West Brom.

To avoid the annual relegation battle RH will insist on another 2/3 quality signings on top, but where from as the market was dead in January.

All the stadium plans too.

Money does not grow on trees, something has got to give.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DutchEagleJohan Flag Vlissingen, Netherlands 20 May 18 12.51pm Send a Private Message to DutchEagleJohan Add DutchEagleJohan as a friend

The story her is that Marcel Brands from PSV Eindhoven has signed for them. As director of football that is.

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

That story is probably made up as Everton currently have no manager or director of football so who is making these so called decisions?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 20 May 18 1.08pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by DutchEagleJohan

The story her is that Marcel Brands from PSV Eindhoven has signed for them. As director of football that is.

Yes indeed.
Has replaced Steve Walsh who was at Leicester.It has been reported that Walsh was on £1 Mill a year at Everton.

A clear-out at Everton and a re-organisation with Denise Barrett-Baxendale being appointed as Chief Executive replacing Robert Elstone.

Edited by Willo (20 May 2018 1.08pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SeagullHunter Flag Reading 20 May 18 1.50pm Send a Private Message to SeagullHunter Add SeagullHunter as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

He'd be a huge loss to us but if Everton are reportedly willing to offer £60m his value will soar in any bidding frenzy. Would certainly cover the ground's development but where would the club be without its talisman?

I think that price quoted is largely misleading, Everton wont be forking out 60m on one player after their large expenditures last summer, unless they have any significant outgoings. As mentioned, he is practically irreplaceable, you would only really sell if you had a ready made replacement, and for that quality it will cost you 70m+. On top of that we'd want extra to strengthen elsewhere, and the fact he is tied down LT. I really dont see us entertaining any offers south of 70m!

 


Dont let Cabaye go

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 20 May 18 3.32pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

I have absolutely no idea who we'd replace him with to get that same level of impact, or the confidence that the big money signing wouldn't be a comparative flop. For me, that makes him fairly priceless.

If we were offered £70m, I guess you'd take it. Then probably sign Shaqiri and use the remainder to sign a couple of top players who you'd hope hit the ground running and move us up a level.

Priceless is priceless “without price; beyond money”. No such thing as “fairly” priceless, and if we would indeed take £70m, then he isn’t priceless.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pssguy Flag 20 May 18 3.52pm Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

The whole situation has changed from years ago, when we needed to sell to survive.
Now we don't need to sell our players, so why on earth would we sell our best player for any amount, we only then need to replace them with the money received. So whats the point in selling, unless he insists on going, then you have no choice.

One reason is that you want to upgrade on the other players. One argument for keeping Zaha is that when he is injured we lose. If all your eggs are in 1 basket you are risking trouble if he had a Dann/Puncheon/Sako setback. He is after all the target man for the opposition

The problem, as other posters have, is getting the right players. If the January window was intended to upgrade side rather than making sure we had squad players, that is not too encouraging. I'd say, overall, since Holloway the transfers have been reasonably successful

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > What price for Zaha would be too tempting?