This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
elgrande bedford 31 Oct 17 2.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
How is that my spin? Not really you just had to put your petty "tory cunds" bit in.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 31 Oct 17 3.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think people here may often be mistaking making a pass at someone, in honesty, for sexual harassment. Harassment is usually what happens when the pass is rejected, but you keep on doing it. I've managed to avoid harassing women and maintain a fairly decent sexual life as a single man.
So, when a colleague suggests a quick roll under the conference table, that's not harassment. But if it's your boss, and he/she says "if you want to keep your job or get a raise/promotion, we're going to f*** under the table", that's harassment, because it's coerced by someone who has power over you. Also, "compliance" doesn't mean acceptance or agreement. If a man points a gun at you and says "give me your wallet or I'll kill you", and you hand over your wallet, you've been robbed. If a man comes up to a women and says "shut up, lay down and don't move or I'll kill you" and then rapes her, she's still been raped even though she was compliant. Edited by Ray in Houston (31 Oct 2017 3.03pm)
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 3.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
Not really you just had to put your petty "tory cunds" bit in. Is that why I asked if any mp's from other parties were implicated. The labour MP was suspended, and good f***ing riddance too. What was noticeable was that bbcpolitics tweeted about that case 4 or 5 times more than the Tory implicated in sending 'sugar tits' to anne summers to buy sex toys. Can't remember his name. You've also not read my other posts on the Weinstein thread. What do you think of the bind TM is in. If she takes action, she could lose parliamentary majority, if she doesn't, she loses credibility. Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 3.05pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 31 Oct 17 3.05pm | |
---|---|
Does it really matter if they're Tory, Labour, SNP, UKIP or Bingo-Bongo party. Sexual harassment is in no way acceptable behaviour for anyone, let alone an MP.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 31 Oct 17 3.10pm | |
---|---|
Very true,but thats on the other thread,i thought Forest was starting a have a giggle thread.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 31 Oct 17 3.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Is that why I asked if any mp's from other parties were implicated. The labour MP was suspended, and good f***ing riddance too. What was noticeable was that bbcpolitics tweeted about that case 4 or 5 times more than the Tory implicated in sending 'sugar tits' to anne summers to buy sex toys. Can't remember his name. You've also not read my other posts on the Weinstein thread. What do you think of the bind TM is in. If she takes action, she could lose parliamentary majority, if she doesn't, she loses credibility. Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 3.05pm) As i just said leave the party bollocks on tne other thread,i think this a piss take thread.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 31 Oct 17 3.18pm | |
---|---|
It's all very simple at its core....it's about consent. It is fine for the boss to f*** the cleaner, if the cleaner wants it.....though even if it is all above board the boss is opening themselves up to a later claim of abuse. I have a problem with the expansion of what is now apparently 'unacceptable'. Making a pass isn't unacceptable, it can be inappropriate but unless someone ignores a refusal it's just common sexual behaviour. Society at the moment rewards 'offence'.....if you aren't automatically believing every claim regardless of some evidence for it....your are apparently, 'blaming the victim'. Soft headed bulls***. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Oct 2017 3.19pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PaddyMcPaddy 31 Oct 17 3.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
How is that my spin? To be fair the discussion started as a bit of tongue and cheek about the harassment situation. So no it probably wasn't that pertinent. You could have shared an amusing story of a women groping you. That would have been more pertinent.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PaddyMcPaddy
To be fair the discussion started as a bit of tongue and cheek about the harassment situation. So no it probably wasn't that pertinent. You could have shared an amusing story of a women groping you. That would have been more pertinent. Fair enough. I apologise
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 31 Oct 17 4.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's all very simple at its core....it's about consent. It is fine for the boss to f*** the cleaner, if the cleaner wants it.....though even if it is all above board the boss is opening themselves up to a later claim of abuse. I have a problem with the expansion of what is now apparently 'unacceptable'. Making a pass isn't unacceptable, it can be inappropriate but unless someone ignores a refusal it's just common sexual behaviour. Society at the moment rewards 'offence'.....if you aren't automatically believing every claim regardless of some evidence for it....your are apparently, 'blaming the victim'. Soft headed bulls***. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Oct 2017 3.19pm) Well put.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 31 Oct 17 4.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Fair enough. I apologise I thought that these days everyone was supposed to be totally open about sex and at it all the time, changing gender every five minutes and 'celebrating' it all. Now any sort of sexual advance is deemed abuse. It's very confusing. Perhaps people should start wearing badges with 'up for it' and their preferences, current gender, their limits, terms and conditions etc
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
tome Inner Tantalus Time. 31 Oct 17 4.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's all very simple at its core....it's about consent. It is fine for the boss to f*** the cleaner, if the cleaner wants it.....though even if it is all above board the boss is opening themselves up to a later claim of abuse. I have a problem with the expansion of what is now apparently 'unacceptable'. Making a pass isn't unacceptable, it can be inappropriate but unless someone ignores a refusal it's just common sexual behaviour. Society at the moment rewards 'offence'.....if you aren't automatically believing every claim regardless of some evidence for it....your are apparently, 'blaming the victim'. Soft headed bulls***. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Oct 2017 3.19pm) Agreed. Have you come across any awkward prepositioning as a teacher? I have no stories like Forests, though I got a little flustered when a woman ran her leg against mine under the table at work. Some guys get all the luck, huh?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.