You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?
November 24 2024 10.29pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 05 Sep 17 11.55am Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Let me get this right. We have 1 space left.

If we sign 2 older players in January, what are our options, if everything else stays the same?

Could we include those 2 and give Mutch a job in the kitchen?

Yes. If we have more than 25 eligible players, aged over 21, we can choose which 25 to name. If we have exactly 25, we'd have to name them all. Less than 25 and we could fill the spaces with free agents.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 05 Sep 17 11.59am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave

Yes. If we have more than 25 eligible players, aged over 21, we can choose which 25 to name. If we have exactly 25, we'd have to name them all. Less than 25 and we could fill the spaces with free agents.

I understand you. Your post means it doesn't affect recruitment. Just means we can't pick Mutch who we never want to anyway.

But then Dan89 says something else.

Still unclear then.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 05 Sep 17 12.04pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Dan89

Willo always goes quite, when his in the wrong.

Where have I been "In the wrong" ?

I just said I wasn't aware of any new rule regarding players who MUST be named, indeed one of the links you provided went back a few years ! I need to digest what has been highlighted.

At the end of the day if I am proved "Wrong" I am quite content to put my hands up just like I did when I said we would be relegated last season.I started a thread to highlight the fact that I was indeed wrong and I got upbraided for doing so !!!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 12.12pm Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Where have I been "In the wrong" ?

I just said I wasn't aware of any new rule regarding players who MUST be named, indeed one of the links you provided went back a few years ! I need to digest what has been highlighted.

At the end of the day if I am proved "Wrong" I am quite content to put my hands up just like I did when I said we would be relegated last season.I started a thread to highlight the fact that I was indeed wrong and I got upbraided for doing so !!!!

Can you start another thread with willo wrong again
All seriousness, I think bexleydave may have indicated to the actual point. The fact that we didn't get enough players. It only left us with 25 professionals (in the age bracket). All had to be named. Had we have 27 players over the age limit, we had a choice to make but the fact we missed out on niasse, meant unfairly we had to release a player to make room for an incoming free agent.

Edited by Dan89 (05 Sep 2017 12.13pm)

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 05 Sep 17 12.14pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

I understand you. Your post means it doesn't affect recruitment. Just means we can't pick Mutch who we never want to anyway.

But then Dan89 says something else.

Still unclear then.

He agrees. See his reply to Willo.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matthau Flag South Croydon 05 Sep 17 12.44pm Send a Private Message to matthau Add matthau as a friend

According to that latest Sagna link, we can now grab two freebies cos of releasing that other player the other day.

so sagna is one, I hope the other is striker pizarro or lambert or Sen, then perhaps sign up a young under 21 GK. an experienced striker is a lot more essential than a 3rd GK I think, we can get a youth GK, a youth ST with any clout to play Tekkers role will be impossible.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 05 Sep 17 1.07pm Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave

Yes. If we have more than 25 eligible players, aged over 21, we can choose which 25 to name. If we have exactly 25, we'd have to name them all. Less than 25 and we could fill the spaces with free agents.

Dave don't think that's correct.
You have to name them all (contracted) we had to many hence the young Goaly went.
We now have 1 space for a free agent.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matthau Flag South Croydon 05 Sep 17 1.13pm Send a Private Message to matthau Add matthau as a friend

no we have two. link coming up...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matthau Flag South Croydon 05 Sep 17 1.23pm Send a Private Message to matthau Add matthau as a friend

na cant find it, im at work, I saw it earlier, it was within the sagna link that's now disappeared, the one where sagna is in man city blue jersey and wearing headphones, its now not within the external links below.

anyway, within that article it says we had 24, now we released and paid off that player of ours, forgot his name, we have 23.

so two spaces to fill.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 05 Sep 17 1.23pm Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

Dave don't think that's correct.
You have to name them all (contracted) we had to many hence the young Goaly went.
We now have 1 space for a free agent.


Not true if you have say 25 over age players you register all of them but you can swap so many if you bring in other people.

It may be in players contract they have to be in the 25 man squard which I expect Wickham has in his.

The problem is the Prem has different rules to the other engish leagues it's stupid.

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jeeagles Flag 05 Sep 17 1.34pm

Seems like if you don't have 25 over age players you might as well name them all just in case.

But I've argued for a while,if you have more than 25 players over the age of 25, they should be available on a free transfer or for an auction if more than one club are interested. The selling club should have to honour their contract.

Also, clubs should only be allowed to bring in a maximum of 5 senior players in each transfer window.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace in the Blood Flag 05 Sep 17 1.39pm Send a Private Message to Palace in the Blood Add Palace in the Blood as a friend

Originally posted by matthau

no we have two. link coming up...

We have a maximum of 1 space with cancelling (buying out his contract)KP. Even to fill this space We need EPL permission, however this has never been refused in past.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?