You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Relegation/ 3 worse teams
November 24 2024 10.33pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Relegation/ 3 worse teams

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

  

Bangell Flag Oxford 03 Sep 17 11.43pm Send a Private Message to Bangell Add Bangell as a friend

West Ham, Bournemouth, Brighton, Newcastle.

Look at our best 11 in its proper formation:

Hennessey

Fosu-Mensah Dann Sakho Van Aanholt

Milivojevic Cabaye

Zaha Loftus-Cheek Townsend

Benteke

That's a solid team.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Medway Eagle Flag Whitstable Kent 03 Sep 17 11.46pm Send a Private Message to Medway Eagle Add Medway Eagle as a friend

Swansea
Bournemouth
Newcastle
Brighton

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 04 Sep 17 12.12am Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by Part Time James

It was only a bad window in terms of bringing in personnel to play 3-4-3. If we were playing 4-2-3-1 or a derivative of that then we'd all be salivating over the improved quality of our back four right now.

Time will tell if it's a bad window. I'd like to hope it'll nudge Frank back towards a gradual transition of tactics rather than a blind plunge into the deep end.

Edited by Part Time James (03 Sep 2017 6.08pm)

Agreed.

Hennessey

Fosu-Mensah Tomkins Sakho Van Aanholt

Cabaye Miliojevic

Zaha Loftus-Cheek Townsend

Benteke

That is a great team. It doesn't work as 3-4-3, just doesn't have the personnel in the right positions. That team would laugh up the league as 4-5-1

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Croydonlad Flag sydenham 04 Sep 17 6.01am Send a Private Message to Croydonlad Add Croydonlad as a friend

Originally posted by Part Time James

West Ham
Brighton
Burnley
Stoke

There ya go. I bet my best trousers we finish above them lot.

No wonder you are part time james when you include Burnley and Stoke , BOTH will be COMFORTABLY above us , and so will the other 2 unless we get rid of FDB

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Casual Flag Orpington 04 Sep 17 6.21am Send a Private Message to Casual Add Casual as a friend

Originally posted by leejaneagles

I agree with most that on paper we should be better than lots. We also should be able to better over a whole season and not just 3 games but you do also have to look at the playing catch up scenario.

2 teams mentioned are Huddersfield and Swansea. So as a team planning for 40 points, we have to sit down and say okay, where can we get 6 of those 40 and of course that would be home games against Huddersfield and Swansea.

If the first 3 games were United, Chelsea and Liverpool, we could dust ourselves off now and crack on. The small silver lining is it has exposed De Boer and he may now only get 1 more game but had he lost against a big 3 then he could claim we would lose those anyway and to give him a chance against equal opposition.

Fact of the matter is though we can't keep going for the 'roller coaster' results. People always say oh we'll be alright, it's typical Palace, lose to Huddersfield but beat Liverpool.

Of course that didn't happen this season. Do you think another 3 points at home to Arsenal is likely 2 seasons in a row? I don't. How about taking 3 points home from Stamford Bridge again? It's a no from me.

So if you assume worst case but most realistic scenario of us getting nothing from either game against Tottenham, Chelsea, Arsenal, United, City, Liverpool then you start to realise actually we don't have that many games left to get to 40.

It's then you realise what a terrible handicap we've put ourselves in with our 2 home games so far this season. If we got a financial penalty and was told we'd start the season on -6 points, we wouldn't be optimistic of staying up but that is essentially what we have done thanks to Frank and the teams efforts against Huddersfield and Swansea.


I get your points , but it isn't like starting the season on -6 points as if we win our next game we could go to 15th, we aren't anywhere near 6 points away from the rest. Huddersfield at home was always a tough first game , would have fathered had them in January/February once they've been whacked 4 nil a few times.
Also it's not realistic that we won't get anything home or away against the top 6 , as that's never happened before. We are unlikely to beat all of the brightons, huddersfields etc home and away and we are unlikely to lose to all of the top 6.
We probably won't beat Chelsea away , but you'd have said that each of the last 3 seasons and we've won twice.
Couple of good results and we will be mid table , 3 or 4 loses on the bounce and it would look a bit different.
I reckon we will struggle again , but there's enough teams that will get less points than us. If the manager is sensible around the formation and doesn't persist with puncheon.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 04 Sep 17 8.09am Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Originally posted by Croydonlad

No wonder you are part time james when you include Burnley and Stoke , BOTH will be COMFORTABLY above us , and so will the other 2 unless we get rid of FDB

I agree that Stoke will probably finish above us, but Burnley arguably have a weaker squad than last season following the sales of Gray and Keane, and on paper our first XI is stronger (albeit the squad is thin). They managed a win against Chelsea, but they did only have 9 men on the pitch and Burnley still only won by one goal.

Even the so-called smaller clubs have made some big signings this season and if money talked you would expect to see Newcastle and Brighton struggling. Bournemouth will depend on whether signing experience pays off and I think they'll be flirting with the bottom end at the end of the season.

Personally I think West Ham will be fine.

I can't say I'm confident of a top 17 finish more hopeful!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 04 Sep 17 8.48am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by kevlee

Your not wrong there mate - there doing even worse than us and that takes some doing!

Just think; if WHUFC hadn't signed the trusty England custodian, they might now be in an even worse state!

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
andyeagle Flag 04 Sep 17 8.50am Send a Private Message to andyeagle Add andyeagle as a friend

Brighton will finish below us but that's it!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jimruss Flag Sidcup 04 Sep 17 8.54am Send a Private Message to jimruss Add jimruss as a friend

I think Newcastle and Brighton make up the bottom two and then the third relegation spot is between us, Huddersfield, West Ham and probably Burnley.

I fear for us this season.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sportyteacher Flag London 04 Sep 17 10.09am Send a Private Message to Sportyteacher Add Sportyteacher as a friend

Won't be popular for saying the following but Palace look the worst team at present. I can see the likes of Brighton and Newcastle scoring against us and yet can see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sportyteacher Flag London 04 Sep 17 10.11am Send a Private Message to Sportyteacher Add Sportyteacher as a friend

Originally posted by Sportyteacher

Won't be popular for saying the following but Palace look the worst team at present. I can see the likes of Brighton and Newcastle scoring against us and yet can see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha.

Sorry. Should've read as: '...and yet can't see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha'

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Sep 17 11.57am

Originally posted by Eager eagle

After the embarrassing debacle of the transfer window, I'd like to know everyone's thoughts on 3 teams who are worse than us.
I'd possibly say Brighton and maybe Newcastle, but that is being hopeful as they both have better managers in my opinion.

28m Defender. That's no embarrassing.

Embarrassing is Stern John on a one year, and Freddie Seers on loan, with you back up striker being Calvin Andrew.

Pick three from

West Ham (Worse than us)
Brighton
Newcastle
Huddersfield (good start, but its not about how you start, its where you finish and traditionally a new team starts fairly well and then is relegated once they get 'figured out').
Watford
Burnley

Some of these I think will be near or around us, but effectively are in roughly the same position in terms of quality and size.

Its still too early to tell - Rough diamonds come good, injuries take a toll and flash in the pans fade out etc.

Usually by end of October you have a better view of how things lie.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Relegation/ 3 worse teams