This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Bangell Oxford 03 Sep 17 11.43pm | |
---|---|
West Ham, Bournemouth, Brighton, Newcastle. Look at our best 11 in its proper formation: Hennessey Fosu-Mensah Dann Sakho Van Aanholt Milivojevic Cabaye Zaha Loftus-Cheek Townsend Benteke That's a solid team.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Medway Eagle Whitstable Kent 03 Sep 17 11.46pm | |
---|---|
Swansea
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ambrose7 Croydon 04 Sep 17 12.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
It was only a bad window in terms of bringing in personnel to play 3-4-3. If we were playing 4-2-3-1 or a derivative of that then we'd all be salivating over the improved quality of our back four right now. Time will tell if it's a bad window. I'd like to hope it'll nudge Frank back towards a gradual transition of tactics rather than a blind plunge into the deep end. Edited by Part Time James (03 Sep 2017 6.08pm) Agreed. Hennessey Fosu-Mensah Tomkins Sakho Van Aanholt Cabaye Miliojevic Zaha Loftus-Cheek Townsend Benteke That is a great team. It doesn't work as 3-4-3, just doesn't have the personnel in the right positions. That team would laugh up the league as 4-5-1
26th January 2010 - Enter Administration |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Croydonlad sydenham 04 Sep 17 6.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
West Ham There ya go. I bet my best trousers we finish above them lot. No wonder you are part time james when you include Burnley and Stoke , BOTH will be COMFORTABLY above us , and so will the other 2 unless we get rid of FDB
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Casual Orpington 04 Sep 17 6.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by leejaneagles
I agree with most that on paper we should be better than lots. We also should be able to better over a whole season and not just 3 games but you do also have to look at the playing catch up scenario. 2 teams mentioned are Huddersfield and Swansea. So as a team planning for 40 points, we have to sit down and say okay, where can we get 6 of those 40 and of course that would be home games against Huddersfield and Swansea. If the first 3 games were United, Chelsea and Liverpool, we could dust ourselves off now and crack on. The small silver lining is it has exposed De Boer and he may now only get 1 more game but had he lost against a big 3 then he could claim we would lose those anyway and to give him a chance against equal opposition. Fact of the matter is though we can't keep going for the 'roller coaster' results. People always say oh we'll be alright, it's typical Palace, lose to Huddersfield but beat Liverpool. Of course that didn't happen this season. Do you think another 3 points at home to Arsenal is likely 2 seasons in a row? I don't. How about taking 3 points home from Stamford Bridge again? It's a no from me. So if you assume worst case but most realistic scenario of us getting nothing from either game against Tottenham, Chelsea, Arsenal, United, City, Liverpool then you start to realise actually we don't have that many games left to get to 40. It's then you realise what a terrible handicap we've put ourselves in with our 2 home games so far this season. If we got a financial penalty and was told we'd start the season on -6 points, we wouldn't be optimistic of staying up but that is essentially what we have done thanks to Frank and the teams efforts against Huddersfield and Swansea.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 04 Sep 17 8.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Croydonlad
No wonder you are part time james when you include Burnley and Stoke , BOTH will be COMFORTABLY above us , and so will the other 2 unless we get rid of FDB I agree that Stoke will probably finish above us, but Burnley arguably have a weaker squad than last season following the sales of Gray and Keane, and on paper our first XI is stronger (albeit the squad is thin). They managed a win against Chelsea, but they did only have 9 men on the pitch and Burnley still only won by one goal. Even the so-called smaller clubs have made some big signings this season and if money talked you would expect to see Newcastle and Brighton struggling. Bournemouth will depend on whether signing experience pays off and I think they'll be flirting with the bottom end at the end of the season. Personally I think West Ham will be fine. I can't say I'm confident of a top 17 finish more hopeful!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 04 Sep 17 8.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kevlee
Your not wrong there mate - there doing even worse than us and that takes some doing! Just think; if WHUFC hadn't signed the trusty England custodian, they might now be in an even worse state!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
andyeagle 04 Sep 17 8.50am | |
---|---|
Brighton will finish below us but that's it!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jimruss Sidcup 04 Sep 17 8.54am | |
---|---|
I think Newcastle and Brighton make up the bottom two and then the third relegation spot is between us, Huddersfield, West Ham and probably Burnley. I fear for us this season.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sportyteacher London 04 Sep 17 10.09am | |
---|---|
Won't be popular for saying the following but Palace look the worst team at present. I can see the likes of Brighton and Newcastle scoring against us and yet can see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sportyteacher London 04 Sep 17 10.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sportyteacher
Won't be popular for saying the following but Palace look the worst team at present. I can see the likes of Brighton and Newcastle scoring against us and yet can see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha. Sorry. Should've read as: '...and yet can't see where we can even buy a goal from. WAY too dependent upon Benteke and Zaha'
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Sep 17 11.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eager eagle
After the embarrassing debacle of the transfer window, I'd like to know everyone's thoughts on 3 teams who are worse than us. 28m Defender. That's no embarrassing. Embarrassing is Stern John on a one year, and Freddie Seers on loan, with you back up striker being Calvin Andrew. Pick three from West Ham (Worse than us) Some of these I think will be near or around us, but effectively are in roughly the same position in terms of quality and size. Its still too early to tell - Rough diamonds come good, injuries take a toll and flash in the pans fade out etc. Usually by end of October you have a better view of how things lie.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.