This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Part Time James 18 Jul 17 3.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Cannibalism is fraught with dangers that eating meat from a different species isn't, due the tendency for diseases not to cross species. Mass consumption of humans, would in fact generate all manner of disease and disorders that would make inbreeding look tame. Of course we could feed people to animals. That would keep the population down, decrease the meat industry and deal with unwanted children. Edited by jamiemartin721 (18 Jul 2017 3.33pm) I'm in. We should prioritise those that are rich in nutrients such as people that eat a lot of vegetables.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Jul 17 3.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I'm in. We should prioritise those that are rich in nutrients such as people that eat a lot of vegetables. I'm doing my bit, by feeding dead whores to the pigs.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 18 Jul 17 3.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I'm doing my bit, by feeding dead whores to the pigs. Seems wasteful, you can get another month out of them with good refrigeration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Jul 17 3.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Cannibalism is fraught with dangers that eating meat from a different species isn't, due the tendency for diseases not to cross species. Mass consumption of humans, would in fact generate all manner of disease and disorders that would make inbreeding look tame. Of course we could feed people to animals. That would keep the population down, decrease the meat industry and deal with unwanted children. Edited by jamiemartin721 (18 Jul 2017 3.33pm) I believe a government think tank considered that in the 70's. It was known as The Bricktop Solution....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 18 Jul 17 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So eating less meat is the answer to the population problem? What a ridiculous answer. We were discussing intensive farming not population growth
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Jul 17 4.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
It is arguably though a different question, as its a moral argument about the absurdity of religion vs the morality of consumerism. Yes but the common denominator is still cruelty. I see a lot of whining about factory farming which is by and large controlled by legislation but not much about the cutting of animals throats with knives, without stunning, and for no sensible reason.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Jul 17 4.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
What a ridiculous answer. We were discussing intensive farming not population growth Not as ridiculous as introducing British consumption of meat while ignoring the obvious relationship between the rise of factory farming and population growth.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 18 Jul 17 4.23pm | |
---|---|
Personally, I prefer Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall's approach to farming. People should know what that they are eating, it should be reared humanely if an animal, all parts of the animal should be used. It would help if kids did not think sausages come from plastic packages.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Jul 17 12.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Personally, I prefer Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall's approach to farming. People should know what that they are eating, it should be reared humanely if an animal, all parts of the animal should be used. It would help if kids did not think sausages come from plastic packages. I kind of agree with this. I try not to eat meat more than once per day with red meat being a treat maybe once per week
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 19 Jul 17 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Non-meat eater for 32 years now but forgot i had cooked my son's bacon in the heavy pan this morning when I did my fried egg in it 10 minutes later and promptly wolfed it down on toast. Then i remembered. I'm going to hell.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 19 Jul 17 4.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Personally, I prefer Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall's approach to farming. People should know what that they are eating, it should be reared humanely if an animal, all parts of the animal should be used. It would help if kids did not think sausages come from plastic packages. This is a guy who pushed people to eat more mackerel as cod was running out, then when everyone switched to mackerel and it became endangered, put out a cook book all about fish. Ultimately, if everyone wants to keep eating meat and fish at the levels we do, rejecting intensive farming ain't an option. Either it becomes incredibly expensive, or we use up the vast majority of land mass in the world to produce our meat. Already over a quarter of land on the planet is used for livestock purposes. In st world countries, we now have a fairly simple decision to make. DO we want our food to involve mass murder and suffering, contribute enough greenhouse gases on its own to reach the 2 degree threshold of global warming, and contribute to adverse health issues which scientists currently can't keep up with, because livestock farming is developing so rapidly. Or do we make a fairly easy switch to eating food which increasingly tastes the same, costs less, is less harmful for us and the environment, and isn't predicated on killing an innocent living being. A mass conversion to vege/veganism would counteract what Trump is doing with pulling out of the Paris agreement. People who are defeatist about tackling climate change need to realise this.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 19 Jul 17 6.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
This is a guy who pushed people to eat more mackerel as cod was running out, then when everyone switched to mackerel and it became endangered, put out a cook book all about fish. Ultimately, if everyone wants to keep eating meat and fish at the levels we do, rejecting intensive farming ain't an option. Either it becomes incredibly expensive, or we use up the vast majority of land mass in the world to produce our meat. Already over a quarter of land on the planet is used for livestock purposes. In st world countries, we now have a fairly simple decision to make. DO we want our food to involve mass murder and suffering, contribute enough greenhouse gases on its own to reach the 2 degree threshold of global warming, and contribute to adverse health issues which scientists currently can't keep up with, because livestock farming is developing so rapidly. Or do we make a fairly easy switch to eating food which increasingly tastes the same, costs less, is less harmful for us and the environment, and isn't predicated on killing an innocent living being. A mass conversion to vege/veganism would counteract what Trump is doing with pulling out of the Paris agreement. People who are defeatist about tackling climate change need to realise this. At what point in the hierarchy of living organisms do you regard the killing of them murder?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.