This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Joe Biden: rape
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Stirlingsays  28 Apr 17 12.43pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Here's a question though, would ugly sex robots lower their standards? Good god I hope so.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Part Time James 28 Apr 17 12.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Good god I hope so. If not you could always remove her "no chip" when her back is turned.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Apr 17 12.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think that's very dodgy ground personally and I wouldn't call it rape unless I knew it was. Are you essentially saying that a drunk person can give consent to another drunk person but not to a sober person? If that is the case don't you see how laden with uncertainties and faults this is? If that were so then rape is being carried out all the time with many of those raped not regarding it as such. The consequences of this crime are terrible just as the consequences of a false accusation are. I think you are over confident on this. I think we have to draw a line somewhere, and that's 'reasonable actions'. And by drunk I'm not talking had a few, we're talking three sheets to the wind, hammered as f**k. I think where its questionable grounds for consent, like a sober guy f**king a paralytic stranger - then we should accept on the face of it, that the woman (or man) was incapable of consent, and the sober or lightly intoxicated person is capable of saying understanding someone can't give consent - Provided evidence of toxicity can be demonstrated. i.e. The prosecution can prove she was unconscious, completely s**t faced etc and the other party was capable of reasonable behaviour, then the emphasis should fall on the defence to prove consent. Just that the jury be bound, in such cases, to accept that consent was not given. Why the f**k would any taxi driver think its reasonable to have sex with a customer. You can say no. And lets face it, you probably should say no to f**king random drunk strangers. They're sober, they capable of making a decision. And lets face it, we know that in most of these cases of drunken consent, its just a defence for a guilty party. Its not just the responsibility of women to protect themselves from predatory men, its the respononsiblity of other men as well.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Apr 17 12.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
If not you could always remove her "no chip" when her back is turned. That might prove quite a 'shock' to her. Apologies..puns are no funs.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
NKEagle  Pyongyang 28 Apr 17 12.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Because men can get drunk and not expect to be raped. How about men take some responsibility for a change - If you're having sex with someone who is unconscious or completely drunk, you're a rapist, and a piece of s**t. Why do we make all these pathetic excuses to protect men from taking any kind of responsibility for their actions. Maybe its me, but when I see a woman, who is puking on her shoes, or incapable of speaking, I don't think 'oh sexy'. I like most men, don't feel the need to put my p**** into every possible woman, irrespective of whether they'd enjoy the experience or not. Even when I'm really drunk. I think its an insult to men everywhere, to protect people who don't have control over the behaviour once they see a drunk girl. What if she falls asleep half way through out of boredom?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Apr 17 1.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think we have to draw a line somewhere, and that's 'reasonable actions'. And by drunk I'm not talking had a few, we're talking three sheets to the wind, hammered as f**k. I think where its questionable grounds for consent, like a sober guy f**king a paralytic stranger - then we should accept on the face of it, that the woman (or man) was incapable of consent, and the sober or lightly intoxicated person is capable of saying understanding someone can't give consent - Provided evidence of toxicity can be demonstrated. i.e. The prosecution can prove she was unconscious, completely s**t faced etc and the other party was capable of reasonable behaviour, then the emphasis should fall on the defence to prove consent. Just that the jury be bound, in such cases, to accept that consent was not given. Why the f**k would any taxi driver think its reasonable to have sex with a customer. You can say no. And lets face it, you probably should say no to f**king random drunk strangers. They're sober, they capable of making a decision. And lets face it, we know that in most of these cases of drunken consent, its just a defence for a guilty party. Its not just the responsibility of women to protect themselves from predatory men, its the respononsiblity of other men as well. I think rape is obviously very possible in those situations. I have no doubt many a girl has been raped this way. But it's a case of knowing whether consent was knowingly given or not. I don't believe that being drunk doesn't mean you can't give consent to someone sober..Being unconscious does or out of it...obviously...It's very important that this doesn't become a binary rule and instead comes down to common sense...Do we really want a 'Opp she's had a drink, we can't trust her judgement'...maybe..maybe not..Do we do the same for blokes?....I've seen predatory drunk women in nightclubs...it happens. It isn't always one way. I think we all know that there is a certain type of arsehole who will try to take advantage...that's also rape...perhaps non violent rape by arsehole but still rape. It comes down to proving ability to consent. I just think it needs to be tried on a case by case basis with no set rules.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| elgrande bedford 28 Apr 17 1.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NKEagle
What if she falls asleep half way through out of boredom? Personal experience have we
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Part Time James 28 Apr 17 1.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NKEagle
What if she falls asleep half way through out of boredom? Then go twice. Its not going to count as two rapes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Apr 17 1.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think rape is obviously very possible in those situations. I have no doubt many a girl has been raped this way. But it's a case of knowing whether consent was knowingly given or not. I don't believe that being drunk doesn't mean you can't give consent to someone sober..Being unconscious does or out of it...obviously...It's very important that this doesn't become a binary rule and instead comes down to common sense...Do we really want a 'Opp she's had a drink, we can't trust her judgement'...maybe..maybe not..Do we do the same for blokes?....I've seen predatory drunk women in nightclubs...it happens. It isn't always one way. I think we all know that there is a certain type of arsehole who will try to take advantage...that's also rape...perhaps non violent rape by arsehole but still rape. It comes down to proving ability to consent. I just think it needs to be tried on a case by case basis with no set rules. Yeah when I'm talking drunk - I mean hammered, out of it, staggering s**tfaced drunk. The kind of drunk that's obvious, and clear. Staggering, slurring, making no sense drunk.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Apr 17 1.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NKEagle
What if she falls asleep half way through out of boredom? Five more seconds won't make much difference.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Part Time James 28 Apr 17 1.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If you have a split personality disorder and one of the personalities doesn't fancy a hand shandy, is that considered sexual assault? What about conjoined twins? Is it rape if only one of the heads says yes?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Michaelawt85 Bexley 28 Apr 17 1.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I haven't really heard to much of sober women going around targeting drunk men 'just so they can get some action'. Usually called a sympathy shag rather than rape
When I was a young girl my Mother said to me.. You listen here kid you're CPFC |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.