You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Syria
November 23 2024 12.18am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Syria

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 07 Apr 17 1.26pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

All very compelling. Counter-arguments like "well Assad is a crazy nut job" are just narrative-fed bollox, to be frank.

Worth noting too how important innocent lives become when they are not in either Mosul or Yemen.

Really ? so you think killing thousands of men women and children because they don't want you in charge for ball smashingly obvious reasons is the behaviour of a rational man.

Thank f*** I don't live in your house.

Edited by dannyh (07 Apr 2017 1.26pm)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 07 Apr 17 1.42pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Are we relying on the same sources that swore blind that Saddam possessed WMDs?

Enforced regime changes in ME countries ruled by distasteful despots hasn't panned out too well on the two occasions it's happened in the recent past. You'd have thought the West would have learned something from that but apparently not.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 07 Apr 17 1.52pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Are we relying on the same sources that swore blind that Saddam possessed WMDs?

Enforced regime changes in ME countries ruled by distasteful despots hasn't panned out too well on the two occasions it's happened in the recent past. You'd have thought the West would have learned something from that but apparently not.

No, Turkish hospitals have confirmed the presence of Sarin, to some there is a doubt of who delivered the payload, not to me bombs dropped from planes rules out ISIS in my book, unless I've missed something and ISIS have their own air force now.

I am well aware of the Geo political map and trust me Syria is a testing ground for the Russian war machine.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 07 Apr 17 2.01pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by dannyh

No, Turkish hospitals have confirmed the presence of Sarin, to some there is a doubt of who delivered the payload, not to me bombs dropped from planes rules out ISIS in my book, unless I've missed something and ISIS have their own air force now.

I am well aware of the Geo political map and trust me Syria is a testing ground for the Russian war machine.

As you point out, the matter of who actually deployed the sarin is unclear - although ISIS don't have an air force, they have made extensive use of drones. As others have said, it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to have resorted to this (not saying he didn't, mind) and the possibility that this is the work of ISIS shouldn't be discounted.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
coulsdoneagle Flag London 07 Apr 17 2.06pm Send a Private Message to coulsdoneagle Add coulsdoneagle as a friend

Assad's regime are the only group I believe that can plausibly control the country. Maybe it could function as a strict Islamic state, what is certainly true is that the western backed horse of the moderate rebels don't have the impetus to ever crontrol the country after 7 years of fighting and losing huge numbers of men to more extreme factions or being killed. If we really wanted them in charge we missed the boat to back them properly a long time ago. I think it will be from within the govt eventually, but Assad himself will not he at the helm. He has essentially made his position untenable and by having a new bloke installed from the same stock it gives the west the credibility of saying look, we got rid of Assad, how great are we, without actually changing anything but saving face.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
paperhat Flag croydon 07 Apr 17 2.13pm Send a Private Message to paperhat Add paperhat as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

Assad's regime are the only group I believe that can plausibly control the country. Maybe it could function as a strict Islamic state, what is certainly true is that the western backed horse of the moderate rebels don't have the impetus to ever crontrol the country after 7 years of fighting and losing huge numbers of men to more extreme factions or being killed. If we really wanted them in charge we missed the boat to back them properly a long time ago. I think it will be from within the govt eventually, but Assad himself will not he at the helm. He has essentially made his position untenable and by having a new bloke installed from the same stock it gives the west the credibility of saying look, we got rid of Assad, how great are we, without actually changing anything but saving face.

and you thin the west would 'allow' that to happen?

 


Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 07 Apr 17 2.14pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

As you point out, the matter of who actually deployed the sarin is unclear - although ISIS don't have an air force, they have made extensive use of drones. As others have said, it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to have resorted to this (not saying he didn't, mind) and the possibility that this is the work of ISIS shouldn't be discounted.

Nor should it the work of this man.

wedderburn.jpg Attachment: wedderburn.jpg (19.56Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 07 Apr 17 2.44pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

As you point out, the matter of who actually deployed the sarin is unclear - although ISIS don't have an air force, they have made extensive use of drones. As others have said, it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to have resorted to this (not saying he didn't, mind) and the possibility that this is the work of ISIS shouldn't be discounted.

It's possible yes, but likely No, chemical weapons are not the modus operandi of your average ISIS goat worrier. think about it, how long have they been fighting in that neck of the woods ? why use it now ? and deliver it by drone ? come on I don't think you really believe that.

Where international politics are involved there is always a he said, she said affair. However in this case there is overwhelming evidence that Assad used Sarin nerve Agent on his own people.

There is also the "missing" we did it for our Muslim brothers diatribe that usually accompanies what the livestock worriers consider a success.

Edited by dannyh (07 Apr 2017 2.45pm)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
coulsdoneagle Flag London 07 Apr 17 2.49pm Send a Private Message to coulsdoneagle Add coulsdoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by paperhat

and you thin the west would 'allow' that to happen?

I think until last week USA were saying Assad could carry on. If he was ousted they could comfortably say we are happy with the new regime and slice it that they were responsible for the change without actually anything changing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 07 Apr 17 3.41pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

'A proper investigation'. Sometimes you just have to laugh.

Yeah, lets get Inspector Morse onto the battlefield.

Listen, once its ascertained that the attack was airbased that's the investigation done. Looking for absolute certainty in anything is just an excuse for doing nothing and accepting atrocities. You really have to go with the balance of probabilities.

Otherwise you really just have to go with believing the Russians at the UN. And if you believe Russian statements at the UN I really don't think you can be taken seriously.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 07 Apr 17 3.43pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

I think until last week USA were saying Assad could carry on. If he was ousted they could comfortably say we are happy with the new regime and slice it that they were responsible for the change without actually anything changing.

Who in Trump's administration said that Assad could 'carry on'?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DanH Flag SW2 07 Apr 17 3.44pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

'A proper investigation'. Sometimes you just have to laugh.

Yeah, lets get Inspector Morse onto the battlefield.

Listen, once its ascertained that the attack was airbased that's the investigation done. Looking for absolute certainty in anything is just an excuse for doing nothing and accepting atrocities. You really have to go with the balance of probabilities.

Otherwise you really just have to go with believing the Russians at the UN. And if you believe Russian statements at the UN I really don't think you can be taken seriously.

What's next on your Friday afternoon to-do list now you have Syria solved?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Syria