This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 08 Mar 17 5.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OknotOK
Mings been given 5 game ban which seems disproportionate to the Zlatan one. I think this is totally and utterly ridiculous.It is far from convincing that it was intentional whereas the later incident concerning the elbow certainly appeared to be convincing.Far more clear-cut yet the latter incident results in a 3 match ban and the former 5 matches ! Preposterous.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
milbo Lands End, Cornwall 08 Mar 17 5.27pm | |
---|---|
Very harsh on Mings & Bournemouth. Won't do them any favours in getting drawn into the relegation fight. Should be no more than Ibra's 3 games ban. At least there can be no doubt his was deliberate!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 08 Mar 17 5.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I think this is totally and utterly ridiculous.It is far from convincing that it was intentional whereas the later incident concerning the elbow certainly appeared to be convincing.Far more clear-cut yet the latter incident results in a 3 match ban and the former 5 matches ! Preposterous. "Mark" the day in your calendars. Willo has just criticised a panel of former "elite" referees. I happen to think, having professional insight into the impact of brain injuries, Mings' actions were reckless, dangerous and could easily have resulted in serious life changing injuries to a fellow player. His movements could and should have been reasonably foreseen by him to have resulted in heavy contact with Zlatan's head and understood by him that such contact could cause serious injury. Much more serious than breaking a leg. 5 matches is about right. Players need to understand that what Mings did was seriously dangerous and he should have taken evasive action, whatever the state of play or the game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
milbo Lands End, Cornwall 08 Mar 17 5.35pm | |
---|---|
And wasn't Ibra's deliberate elbow to the head equally dangerous and could have caused a serious head injury??? Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
"Mark" the day in your calendars. Willo has just criticised a panel of former "elite" referees. I happen to think, having professional insight into the impact of brain injuries, Mings' actions were reckless, dangerous and could easily have resulted in serious life changing injuries to a fellow player. His movements could and should have been reasonably foreseen by him to have resulted in heavy contact with Zlatan's head and understood by him that such contact could cause serious injury. Much more serious than breaking a leg. 5 matches is about right. Players need to understand that what Mings did was seriously dangerous and he should have taken evasive action, whatever the state of play or the game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 08 Mar 17 5.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I think this is totally and utterly ridiculous.It is far from convincing that it was intentional whereas the later incident concerning the elbow certainly appeared to be convincing.Far more clear-cut yet the latter incident results in a 3 match ban and the former 5 matches ! Preposterous. But you DO know which teams the respective players play for, don't you? Feel sorry for Bournemouth (but if we stay up at their expense, tough)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chateauferret 08 Mar 17 5.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by milbo
Very harsh on Mings & Bournemouth. Won't do them any favours in getting drawn into the relegation fight. Should be no more than Ibra's 3 games ban. At least there can be no doubt his was deliberate! What did anyone expect? Man U three match ban for clearly deliberate act of violence, fair enough. Bournemouth, nearly twice that for something that nobody could prove wasn't an accident. It was dangerous play, yes, but a deliberate assault? Dudn't look like one to me. Edited by chateauferret (08 Mar 2017 5.39pm)
============ |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Salford eagle 08 Mar 17 5.37pm | |
---|---|
It was clear that Mings meant to step on his head! In the lead up to the jump Zlatan is in his line of vision. In the real world if you accidentally stepped on someone's head you'd go back and check if the person was ok! Step back from the United hatred, studding someone's head is a 5 match ban at a minimum. I have no problem with Zlatan getting retribution, one cowardly act deserves another one in my opinion. Bournemouth seem to have a reputation as this lovely little coastal club, they are a dirty team, hate playing against them and hope they go down.
California sunlight - sweet Calcutta rain - Honolulu starbright - the song remains the same |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 08 Mar 17 5.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by milbo
Very harsh o,n Mings & Bournemouth. Won't do them any favours in getting drawn into the relegation fight. Should be no more than Ibra's 3 games ban. At least there can be no doubt his was deliberate! But however harsh on Mings and Bournemouth, this injustice must surely bring them into the relegation scrap and he our fight to stay up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 08 Mar 17 5.44pm | |
---|---|
From what we saw on TV Mings eyes were following the ball it was not intentional. Can only think the FA know different but in any case 5 weeks is far too harsh.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 08 Mar 17 5.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by milbo
And wasn't Ibra's deliberate elbow to the head equally dangerous and could have caused a serious head injury??? No. Full weight of a 6'5" athlete via studded boot into the side of someone's head much more likely to inflict serious head injury, intentional or otherwise. I think the panel, quite rightly, felt that Mings' actions were unreasonably dangerous and reckless even if not intentional and these kinds of actions can't be tolerated.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Direwolf Lincoln 08 Mar 17 6.06pm | |
---|---|
Having watched the video a number of times I'm not convinced that Ming's actions were deliberate. Yes he looked but I think that was because he knew Zlatan was in his way. When he jumps he is looking at the ball and not at Zlatan's head. Either one believes that his spatial awareness is so good that he can jump on someone's head without looking or more likely that he miscalculated his jump and in addition was pushed off balance by Rooney getting up to winge about the tackle. Ipso facto Rooney should get banned for creating the situation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Direwolf Lincoln 08 Mar 17 6.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
No. Full weight of a 6'5" athlete via studded boot into the side of someone's head much more likely to inflict serious head injury, intentional or otherwise. I think the panel, quite rightly, felt that Mings' actions were unreasonably dangerous and reckless even if not intentional and these kinds of actions can't be tolerated. But surely that would mean that no player can ever hurdle another on the ground in case an unintentionally dangerous or reckless situation was created?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.