It is easy to see why 'virtue signalling' is so flawed.

It’s too often used to cast aspersions on opponents as an alternative to rebutting their arguments.

Whether someone feels morally superior making an argument is irrelevant it is only the argument itself that matters and which you try to avoid.

If a person is arguing a point to make themselves feel morally superior but do not believe in the substantive of that point, then their argument is worthless.

Just as you are doing now. You want to have a pop at me. Go on, do it, get it out of your system.

It's a rare demonstration of solidarity by working people against a paper that has nothing but contempt for the working people it claims to support - unless they are idiots that can be sheopled to toe the Tory line.

The Sun pontificates about British policy and stirs up hatred about immigrants and is owned by a billionaire foreigner who doesn't even live here.

If you don't live in Britain and pay taxes here you should not be allowed to influence our government let alone have it in your pocket as is the case with Murdoch and the Tory Party.

Your problem is that you are judging here but you should be arguing not judging someone you don't know.

What's really funny is that you have proved my point with the above post. You have attempted to make yourself out to be a moral beacon and me inferior, by labelling me 'shallow'. You are demeaning others, thus attempting to elevate yourself.

You don't help yourself.