This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 03 Feb 17 10.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Painter
A bit of a dramatic post. Were you aware that 93% of the UK is urban, that means not built on by houses, factories roads etc. So you should be able to find a green field, there is a lot of them about. I hope not.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Zschopautaler 03 Feb 17 11.56pm | |
---|---|
We have the lowest productivity levels in Europe.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Feb 17 11.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And at what point will enough be enough? It seems your philosophy has no limits on population growth. His response highlights his stupidity and why I don't engage with him directly any more. In fact I can recall him raising this pathetic retort on a previous occasion when I pointed out that the majority of the UK geology makes it frankly absolutely impossible to urbanise - mountains, coast, ancient woodland, bogs, marsh, remote islands etc etc. The remainder could feasibly be built on (and most of it is already) but the green belt is there to protect it from development and to ensure we have land to grow foodstuffs and an environment to promote wildlife. I won't waste anymore time trying to educate him quite frankly.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 04 Feb 17 11.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Painter
A bit of a dramatic post. Were you aware that 93% of the UK is urban, that means not built on by houses, factories roads etc. I suggest you google "urban" and re-educate yourself!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Feb 17 11.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Zschopautaler
We have the lowest productivity levels in Europe. The problem with planning is that it is usually obsolete by the time it gets around to being realised, especially when one of the factors, namely population, keeps increasing by 300,000 rising, every year. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (04 Feb 2017 11.59am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 05 Feb 17 3.07am | |
---|---|
fcuk it, build all over, save the farming elite hunting foxy, let the urban fox prosper!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 05 Feb 17 7.07pm | |
---|---|
the amount of bulging brown envelopes that change hands at the planning stage may surprise people. money talks. Always has....always will.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 05 Feb 17 11.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
His response highlights his stupidity and why I don't engage with him directly any more. In fact I can recall him raising this pathetic retort on a previous occasion when I pointed out that the majority of the UK geology makes it frankly absolutely impossible to urbanise - mountains, coast, ancient woodland, bogs, marsh, remote islands etc etc. The remainder could feasibly be built on (and most of it is already) but the green belt is there to protect it from development and to ensure we have land to grow foodstuffs and an environment to promote wildlife. I won't waste anymore time trying to educate him quite frankly. Go on, edumacate me. What percentage of the uk is geologically not suitable for building on? Geological and geographical if you could seperate it. I'd look it up myself, but apparently I'm 'thick'. Edited by nickgusset (05 Feb 2017 11.51pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 06 Feb 17 12.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Go on, edumacate me. What percentage of the uk is geologically not suitable for building on? Geological and geographical if you could seperate it. I'd look it up myself, but apparently I'm 'thick'. Edited by nickgusset (05 Feb 2017 11.51pm) Well Einstein, the thing is that the countries infrastructure would be in meltdown decades before we ever built on all the available land.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 06 Feb 17 10.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Well Einstein, the thing is that the countries infrastructure would be in meltdown decades before we ever built on all the available land. .... and I've told him on numerous occasions (including my previous post) that I'm not wasting anymore time on him. The information is out there, in various formats, but I'm not prepared to go to the effort (again) of providing the information just for him to ignore it and revert back to his stance of 2 years ago.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 06 Feb 17 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Well Einstein, the thing is that the countries infrastructure would be in meltdown decades before we ever built on all the available land. Then the government should invest in them not make swingeing cuts whilst distracting you by saying it's those foreigners fault.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 06 Feb 17 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
.... and I've told him on numerous occasions (including my previous post) that I'm not wasting anymore time on him. The information is out there, in various formats, but I'm not prepared to go to the effort (again) of providing the information just for him to ignore it and revert back to his stance of 2 years ago. If you assert something but don't back it up it makes one wonder....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.