This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Jan 17 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No its about the integrity of the democratic process, which is effectively the entire basis of a democratic nation and it should be investigated as such. Painting it as 'upset lefties', 'liberal entitlement' etc deflects from the gravity of a foreign national government directly influencing an election in another country (through a serious criminal act). I fail to understand how people, democrat, liberal, republican or otherwise, can see this in a partisan light. In order for democracy to work, trust and integrity in the process of elections is utterly vital. Even if that means having to investigate the president elect (and the opposition). Well America has allegedly been involved in influencing elections abroad, particularly South America for years.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 11 Jan 17 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Well the intelligence services of the US, believe that the Russian security services were involved in the hack and provision of material to wiki leaks of the Clinton Emails, which was timed to affect the election. It also seems that Russian hackers were trying to penetrate the security around electronic voting machines. Bear in mind, that potentially if an American was involved in that hack, its an act of treason by US standards. Of course that doesn't mean that Trump was involved or conspired, that would need to be proven. Similarly for anyone in his campaign. I don't see why people think this should be about Trump or Clinton, its about far more important issues. Things like this must transcend partisan political divides. They're more important than whether your democrat / republican / nutbar fringe fridge door. Personally, I'm not approaching this from any particular partisan angle. External interference in the democratic process of a sovereign nation is indeed a serious matter (although it's something the US has been pretty good at over the years) but so far, it's been long on allegation but short of definite proof. However, I don't dismiss the possibility that there may be an element of 'dirty tricks' by the incumbent administration - the FBI 'believe' that they have evidence but it wouldn't be the first time that the FBI has been misused by the Executive. Let's see some actual proof before jumping to conclusions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 11 Jan 17 12.29pm | |
---|---|
It doesn't surprise that the voters screw up and vote for someone they don't want not at all. But that's their problem. If Russia has found some way to directly influence the American voter i.e. canvassing in some way but it does seem far-fetched why would the American voter be influenced by the Russkies would have thought the opposite.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Jan 17 12.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Well America has allegedly been involved in influencing elections abroad, particularly South America for years.
Yes, the US has undermined elections around the world and I don't accept that as acceptable either. I don't see it as a conspiracy theory because a) the FBI is pursuing a number of leads, Clinton was hacked and material was distributed, and a number of people both republican, democrat and federal agencies seem to believe that there is a case to answer. I'm saying the FBI and Homeland Security should be allowed to continue their investigation - and a senate committee should oversee associated issues. I don't know what the extent of the hacking was, who was involved, the degree of relationship between Russia and Trumps campaign and so on.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Jan 17 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Firstly, I didn't start this thread as a lefty handwringer, it's something in the news worth a discussion. Secondly, if, as is suspected, Russia were involved in shaping public opinion leading up to the election in order to help Trump only to use info to 'blackmail' Trump we should be worried that they are on a mission to destabilise the 'leaders of the western world. '
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Jan 17 12.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It doesn't surprise that the voters screw up and vote for someone they don't want not at all. But that's their problem. If Russia has found some way to directly influence the American voter i.e. canvassing in some way but it does seem far-fetched why would the American voter be influenced by the Russkies would have thought the opposite. Its a bit more complicated than that. There is concern that hackers working in Russia, for the Russian government, stole documents from Hilary Clinton at the State Department, and handed these over via an agent to wikileaks. Interestingly, the FBI have been investigating some of these allegations for a while, and did apply for Homeland FISA warrents on members of the Trump presidential campaign, several of whom do have substantial links to Russian Business interests. So its not really about Russia 'potentially influencing the election, but subverting it'
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 11 Jan 17 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Firstly, I didn't start this thread as a lefty handwringer, it's something in the news worth a discussion. Secondly, if, as is suspected, Russia were involved in shaping public opinion leading up to the election in order to help Trump only to use info to 'blackmail' Trump we should be worried that they are on a mission to destabilise the 'leaders of the western world. ' So the (usual) destabilisers may well become the destabilised?
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Jan 17 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Yes, the US has undermined elections around the world and I don't accept that as acceptable either. I don't see it as a conspiracy theory because a) the FBI is pursuing a number of leads, Clinton was hacked and material was distributed, and a number of people both republican, democrat and federal agencies seem to believe that there is a case to answer. I'm saying the FBI and Homeland Security should be allowed to continue their investigation - and a senate committee should oversee associated issues. I don't know what the extent of the hacking was, who was involved, the degree of relationship between Russia and Trumps campaign and so on. Fair enough, but there has been evidence in plenty of other conspiracies, the difference being that the people investigating were probably part of the same organisation that were covering it up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 11 Jan 17 2.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Joe Public just votes for who he wants surely there is no Russian influence there? Trump or Clinton which candidate do I want there is no suggestion of interference with the count. So they voted Trump and wish they had not and have cold feet it's quite scary the power he will wield. Quite see what you post - no suspicion of the FBI in your mind? Of course the Russians are up to no good we know that its what we are up against hacking their way into our defences and causing any type of problem they can an election is just another opportunity.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Jan 17 3.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Joe Public just votes for who he wants surely there is no Russian influence there? Trump or Clinton which candidate do I want there is no suggestion of interference with the count. So they voted Trump and wish they had not and have cold feet it's quite scary the power he will wield. Quite see what you post - no suspicion of the FBI in your mind? Of course the Russians are up to no good we know that its what we are up against hacking their way into our defences and causing any type of problem they can an election is just another opportunity. Because people don't just vote for who they want - they vote according to what they know and are. And the email scandal and leaks certainly played a role in the run up to the election (and Trump certainly capitalised on them). If they targeted the opposition candidate, its one thing. If they did so to support the president elect without him or his campaigns knowledge, then its fine. But if Trump or people close to him were complicit in engaging a foreign power to subvert an election, then that's probably treason. A number of the campaign seem to have had some links to Russia, and Trump did openly call on Russia to hack Hillary... It needs to be properly investigated, and its much bigger than who people like, wanted or voted for, as it could essential amount to serious criminal charges
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Jan 17 3.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Joe Public just votes for who he wants surely there is no Russian influence there? Trump or Clinton which candidate do I want there is no suggestion of interference with the count. So they voted Trump and wish they had not and have cold feet it's quite scary the power he will wield. Quite see what you post - no suspicion of the FBI in your mind? Of course the Russians are up to no good we know that its what we are up against hacking their way into our defences and causing any type of problem they can an election is just another opportunity.
Also these allegations go back to before the election. Also its not just the Democrats that are urging investigation, some republicans are also - and its the right thing to do. Also there are allegations that the Russians have blackmail material that should definitely be investigated - the idea that the president of the US could be coerced by Russia is a serious issue.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 11 Jan 17 4.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Well the intelligence services of the US, believe that the Russian security services were involved in the hack and provision of material to wiki leaks of the Clinton Emails, which was timed to affect the election. It also seems that Russian hackers were trying to penetrate the security around electronic voting machines. Bear in mind, that potentially if an American was involved in that hack, its an act of treason by US standards. Of course that doesn't mean that Trump was involved or conspired, that would need to be proven. Similarly for anyone in his campaign. I don't see why people think this should be about Trump or Clinton, its about far more important issues. Things like this must transcend partisan political divides. They're more important than whether your democrat / republican / nutbar fringe fridge door. Isn't it funny that most lefties have total faith in the US security service on this matter. I remember when the US security services said there were WMD in Iraq, the lefties all said this was lies and denounced the US security services. Why the 360 on this particular issue?
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.