Wilf was playing well until that incident & his reaction was far more than anyone could expect for a poor refereeing decision- given the intensity of the tantrum he threw & the time it went on for something else had to be the cause - my guess is that either the ref or one of the Chelsea players said something bang out of line (something that clearly rattled him) if it was one of the Chelsea players that said something the ref must have heard it too otherwise it was a clear bookable offence for that length of argument.

Really? Getting sent off would have been demonstrating his ability as a captain?

His reaction is exactly what I would want from a leader on the pitch.

no after match tweet from Wilf which is unusual

..all points to the ref having done something doesn't it, because he would have just sent him off, plain and simple.

i dont know what was said to him but it must have been bad for him to react like that.

there no way that was just about the decision given against him.

‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway

It's hardly inconceivable that it may have been a catalyst. I mean it went on for flipping ages, and despite having legitimate grounds for protest, he appeared to completely lose the plot (with everyone and whilst on live TV). His input on the game after this moment was minimal which was the biggest shame of all.

1/6/2010.a new era.we made it everyone!!!lets get the ball rolling for another 105 years of proud history.thank you cpfc2010.

palace forever.eeaaaaaaaaaaaaaggglless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!