You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Anyone going to acknowledge the bad luck...
November 25 2024 6.43pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Anyone going to acknowledge the bad luck...

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

Flightsequence Flag 15 Dec 16 7.00am Send a Private Message to Flightsequence Add Flightsequence as a friend

Originally posted by gambler

Absolutely correct.

Are some people so blind they can't see. That ref was s***e to both sides.

Pardew decided that game.

What a very very odd comment? If you are referring to the Jimmy Mac sub, then you obviously don't know football.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
KAOS Flag In a tree 15 Dec 16 8.07am Send a Private Message to KAOS Add KAOS as a friend

Can't believe some people still comment on how we just have no luck and bad refereeing when we lose!!! They've actually swallowed Pardew's pathetic rhetoric! It's just desperate when you have to cling to those excuses ... pathetic! You make your own luck and referring decisions even out over the course of a season!

Wake up people ... 6 league wins in 2016!!! It's 2017 in a couple of weeks FFS!!!

F*ck off Pardew and leave out club alone!!!!!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kintak11 Flag Vauxhall, London 15 Dec 16 8.17am Send a Private Message to Kintak11 Add Kintak11 as a friend

Originally posted by Flightsequence

What a very very odd comment? If you are referring to the Jimmy Mac sub, then you obviously don't know football.

Dominic Fifield of the Guardian does know football.. Here's his objective comment. Not cheering but it has the ring of truth.

'The decision to fling on Fraizer Campbell for McArthur near the end, disrupting shape yet again, might also be scrutinised. Substitutions are not coming off at present, and there is a whiff of inevitability to their plight. Chelsea visit these parts on Saturday. There is no respite in sight.'

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 15 Dec 16 8.22am Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

I don't hate Pardew, but it is time for him to go. I do have some sympathy over the last two games, we could potentially be 4 points better off with a decent standard of officiating. Suddenly things would seem relatively rosy.

However, handball or not, me, my son, the fans sat around me and probably the OP all knew utd would score once the freekick was given.

That's why he has to go

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Tom R Flag Huddersfield 15 Dec 16 8.26am Send a Private Message to Tom R Add Tom R as a friend

The ref was very poor getting decisions against both sides wrong. However, the red card for Rojo would have been a game changer. Any team playing two thirds of the match with ten men will struggle especially when before and after that he was their best defender.
Despite the handball for their goal we should have defended the free kick better as there was none of our players close to the ball when it came in to the box.
I was not happy when the substitution was made, but we do have to accept that it was quality football from two very expensive players to create and score the goal.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dynamicdick Flag Dormansland 15 Dec 16 8.28am Send a Private Message to dynamicdick Add dynamicdick as a friend

Originally posted by Flightsequence

What a very very odd comment? If you are referring to the Jimmy Mac sub, then you obviously don't know football.

Really, please explain your logic behind the substitution as many thousands can't see it?

 


Bring back Brolin

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
KAOS Flag In a tree 15 Dec 16 8.32am Send a Private Message to KAOS Add KAOS as a friend

Originally posted by Tom R

The ref was very poor getting decisions against both sides wrong. However, the red card for Rojo would have been a game changer. Any team playing two thirds of the match with ten men will struggle especially when before and after that he was their best defender.
Despite the handball for their goal we should have defended the free kick better as there was none of our players close to the ball when it came in to the box.
I was not happy when the substitution was made, but we do have to accept that it was quality football from two very expensive players to create and score the goal.

If they went down to 10 men we still would have lost as has been proved before!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Flightsequence Flag 15 Dec 16 8.46am Send a Private Message to Flightsequence Add Flightsequence as a friend

Originally posted by dynamicdick

Really, please explain your logic behind the substitution as many thousands can't see it?

Jimmy Mac was obviously knackered having done the running of two men during the game. Pardew had already plugged the gap in midfield with earlier adjustments to the team (Leadley), and dropping Wilf deeper and wide, and Campbells introduction was not a straight swap for Jimmy Mac but an effort to put Man U on the back foot. Sometimes this takes pressure off midfield and also gives us a change up front in the hope that fresh legs may just tip the attacking balance. Like it did on Saturday. He could so easily have took off Cabaye as his tiredness showed with how easily Pogba shoved him off the ball for the goal. By the end of the match, we still had a midfield 4 and 2 up front, but with the width back with Fryers and Zaha and with the potential to attack with four. Why not go for a win. It's what we all watch football for isn't it. And before you say it, Andros Townsend instead of Fryers was not the answer for the width, because then we would have had two out and out attacking wingers, but we still needed to attack but be able to defend as well hence it was Fryers. Still with all the many thousands not seeing it, I must be wrong. And the overall answer to the problem, is we need a stronger defensive midfield player!!

Edited by Flightsequence (15 Dec 2016 8.54am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 15 Dec 16 8.58am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

The arrogance of Alan Pardew is spreading like a disease or virus through the HOL. It would appear only the realistic among us are immune. Vast swathes of the HOL are (ironically) being cured by the insane teachings of AP, but we still have the likes of the OP who are clearly highly infected, and suffering from the same deluded miss placed arrogance as the original host carrier.

There are still many that need our help, if you hear of anyone constantly blaming referee's, luck, or mutters "transition" repeatedly when the win ratio of 6 in 40 crops up, then please offer your help, as chances are they about to give 5 grand to a Nigerian prince, or invest in sending icebergs to the Sahara.

OUT. NOW.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 15 Dec 16 9.03am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Flightsequence

Jimmy Mac was obviously knackered having done the running of two men during the game. Pardew had already plugged the gap in midfield with earlier adjustments to the team (Leadley), and dropping Wilf deeper and wide, and Campbells introduction was not a straight swap for Jimmy Mac but an effort to put Man U on the back foot. Sometimes this takes pressure off midfield and also gives us a change up front in the hope that fresh legs may just tip the attacking balance. Like it did on Saturday. He could so easily have took off Cabaye as his tiredness showed with how easily Pogba shoved him off the ball for the goal. By the end of the match, we still had a midfield 4 and 2 up front, but with the width back with Fryers and Zaha and with the potential to attack with four. Why not go for a win. It's what we all watch football for isn't it. And before you say it, Andros Townsend instead of Fryers was not the answer for the width, because then we would have had two out and out attacking wingers, but we still needed to attack but be able to defend as well hence it was Fryers. Still with all the many thousands not seeing it, I must be wrong. And the overall answer to the problem, is we need a stronger defensive midfield player!!

Edited by Flightsequence (15 Dec 2016 8.54am)

Sorry mate but that is utter contradictory codswallop. You can't say go for the win, the bring on a defender, you can't say it was right to bring of McCarthur with 4 mins left and leave Cabaye on who clearly the more tired of the the two.

he did the same thing when we played Hull, winning 1-2 away from home he takes JM off and we scrape a 3-3 draw. same thing against Burnley 4-3 up JM goes off we lose 5-4.

The man is an idiot and if you think Brining Cambell on instead of an England international is OK, then I'm afraid you are beyond reasoning with.

AP is sh1t just accept it.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
beer man Flag Kent 15 Dec 16 9.05am Send a Private Message to beer man Add beer man as a friend

Originally posted by Flightsequence

Jimmy Mac was obviously knackered having done the running of two men during the game. Pardew had already plugged the gap in midfield with earlier adjustments to the team (Leadley), and dropping Wilf deeper and wide, and Campbells introduction was not a straight swap for Jimmy Mac but an effort to put Man U on the back foot. Sometimes this takes pressure off midfield and also gives us a change up front in the hope that fresh legs may just tip the attacking balance. Like it did on Saturday. He could so easily have took off Cabaye as his tiredness showed with how easily Pogba shoved him off the ball for the goal. By the end of the match, we still had a midfield 4 and 2 up front, but with the width back with Fryers and Zaha and with the potential to attack with four. 1. Why not go for a win. It's what we all watch football for isn't it. And before you say it, Andros Townsend instead of Fryers was not the answer for the width, because then we would have had two out and out attacking wingers, but we still needed to attack but be able to defend as well hence it was Fryers. Still with all the many thousands not seeing it, 2. I must be wrong. And 3. the overall answer to the problem, is we need a stronger defensive midfield player!!

1.Because it's a tactic that frequently ends with us conceding a late goal that costs us points.

2. Yes, you are.

3. The overall answer to the problem is to despatch Pardew.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cpj Flag Kent 15 Dec 16 9.11am Send a Private Message to cpj Add cpj as a friend

Is the Pardewout.com domain name still active?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Anyone going to acknowledge the bad luck...