This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Snodgrass
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Inapickle  South West 12 Dec 16 12.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Absolutely, he also went over like he'd been brought down, and looked for the penalty. The only thing that was an accident was his assumption that Dann would make any contact. Plus, he got up, took the penalty and scored without a word to the referee etc. ..retrospective cheating should result in a rematch, there is no other way, players will soon understand that cheating will be picked up they will be punished for it and the game will be replayed, none of their team mates or opposition are going to want to replay anything including fans..so it will result in players owning up to cheating at the time to avoid a replay and ultimately wiping this stuff out.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 12 Dec 16 12.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Inapickle
..retrospective cheating should result in a rematch, there is no other way, players will soon understand that cheating will be picked up they will be punished for it and the game will be replayed, none of their team mates or opposition are going to want to replay anything including fans..so it will result in players owning up to cheating at the time to avoid a replay and ultimately wiping this stuff out. I don't think that's viable, and the extra game is a massive burden on the aggrieved side. Something like video tech would be more viable than a rematch. The player, and the club involved need to take a 'real hit' to rule out this kind of thing.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 1.27pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I don't think that's viable, and the extra game is a massive burden on the aggrieved side. Something like video tech would be more viable than a rematch. The player, and the club involved need to take a 'real hit' to rule out this kind of thing. Just start having citations as they have in rugby and makes the punishments meaty enough. A month for example for an offence like this, 2 months for the second one etc.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| steeleye20 Croydon 12 Dec 16 1.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
An FA panel would review video evidence and decide if the player as in this case dived to win a penalty which was converted. They would have the power to rescind the goal in addition to suspending the player for 6 months to 1 year. Had enough of this years ago just can't think of a way to keep the game flowing so think for the first time a goal could be rescinded after a match. A long suspension would significantly damage the player hopefully. I haven't seen a game for ages since watching DaCostas antics.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 12 Dec 16 1.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Would also say what example is the Hull manager setting here as his player has admitted what he did?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 12 Dec 16 1.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Would also say what example is the Hull manager setting here as his player has admitted what he did? His comments are just w***erish, but then he used to work at Man U and probably thinks he's entitled to penalties that weren't.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Phil H 12 Dec 16 1.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
1) At the high speed the game is played you can't expect the ref always to spot it so every penalty decision should be reviewed on camera by 4th official like rugby or cricket.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Palace in the Blood 12 Dec 16 1.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Most of the retrospective punishments do nothing for the party most affected ie us. If snodgrass is banned it means Hull have lost their best player for next game, which may help a rival not us. Chalking off the goal will never happen as all our relegation rivals would appeal it. What about docking Hull 3 points? This would mean clubs themselves would try to do something about diving
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
aquickgame2  Beni = summer,Caribbean = winter 12 Dec 16 1.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Simple answer to all of this bollux. Video Ref/Technology.........we have it,we should use it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| spartakev2 Anerley 12 Dec 16 1.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Inapickle
..retrospective cheating should result in a rematch, there is no other way, players will soon understand that cheating will be picked up they will be punished for it and the game will be replayed, none of their team mates or opposition are going to want to replay anything including fans..so it will result in players owning up to cheating at the time to avoid a replay and ultimately wiping this stuff out. So we replay and loose. ...sounds like a great idea....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| gerry theagle newbury 12 Dec 16 1.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I hope the cheating git gets a nice "warm" Selhurst Park welcome when Hull come to us in May,sadly thats all will happen to him so lets make it nice and personal!!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eagle@ tn34 hastings 12 Dec 16 2.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Snodarse says in the paper today that hes no cheat and hes changed his ride the tackle story to he was just getting out of the way as he had a bad injury in the past. Ill be giving him some verbals when i see him on the pitch next time. W##ker
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.