You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > News bias?
November 23 2024 4.14am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

News bias?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 26 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 24 Nov 16 4.24pm

Originally posted by elgrande

So what is this constant hate of everything forgien you speak of then nick.
Certain papers will report things that are sometimes over hyped shall we say.
But this so called constant bollock sprouting is just that bullocks.
The BBC almost go out of their way to not report on things that could put Muslims in a bad way.
How much reporting were done on all the cases of child sex gangs run by mostly...remember that word mostly by Asian gangs.
How many extremists plots are foiled by the MI5/MI6/ special branch each week.but you rarely hear about them.

Be honest. If it was a Muslim extremist that killed Jo Cox, the conviction would have been all over the front pages of the mail for days.

The BBC go out of their way... Do you have any specific examples other than the mostly Muslim rape gangs? Were are the figures to say rape gangs are mostly Muslim.

You say certain papers print things that are over hyped. I'd say they print inflammatory nonsense cleverly dressed up as fact that is meant to instill fear and hate among the readership. find someone to hate or blame when it's those that are in charge that are responsible for the s*** state of affairs. Orwell had it right with the 3 minutes hate in 1984.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 24 Nov 16 4.26pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Isn't this the reverse of what you were accusing Nick of, because I certainly remember a lot of coverage on the trials of those child sex gangs, and a lot of outcry against the police and social services who TOTALLY allowed it to happen.

Then again the BBC hasn't had the best reputation for breaking stories about pedophiles....

There wasn't that much Jamie,and it took years for any one to start to take it seriously, because it was to much of a sensitive issue to deal with.
And I take your point about the BBC and pedophiles.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 24 Nov 16 4.28pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

You haven't countered anything. Not even the why the daily mail buried the conviction of someone who killed an MP on p.30. An MP was killed and it's on page 30!

I didn't have you down as a subscriber.

Does it really matter what page it's on? It was probably the most pointless trial ever in the end. He wouldn't speak and it all happened in broad daylight in front of witnesses.

What page was it on the day after it happened?

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 24 Nov 16 4.33pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Be honest. If it was a Muslim extremist that killed Jo Cox, the conviction would have been all over the front pages of the mail for days.

The BBC go out of their way... Do you have any specific examples other than the mostly Muslim rape gangs? Were are the figures to say rape gangs are mostly Muslim.

You say certain papers print things that are over hyped. I'd say they print inflammatory nonsense cleverly dressed up as fact that is meant to instill fear and hate among the readership. find someone to hate or blame when it's those that are in charge that are responsible for the s*** state of affairs. Orwell had it right with the 3 minutes hate in 1984.

Most normal people take the press with a pinch of salt,I tend to make my own mind up about things.
There is no real difference between right wing rags and left wing rags,they print what they feel their particular following want to hear.
And as for the Asian (Muslim) child sex gangs I haven't said they are all Muslim, what I meant is that it went on for years because the authorities were to scared to tackle it for fear being classed as racist.
And that in itself is wrong to the core.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 24 Nov 16 4.50pm

Originally posted by elgrande

There wasn't that much Jamie,and it took years for any one to start to take it seriously, because it was to much of a sensitive issue to deal with.
And I take your point about the BBC and pedophiles.

Its astonishing how its always someone else's fault and never the police or social services. Those Asian men got away with it for so long, because like Savile, and paedo rings in care homes, they abused the kids no one really gave a s**t about.

Just as 'Savile was too powerful' or had 'too much status', and nothing to do with the fact he was in with the cops. Too awkward personally more like and they'd written those kids off.

That's the tragic truth here. We, as a society, with our apparatus of state authority, totally failed those kids, for an easier life. The authorities in care homes actively told staff members to ignore what was going on, and the police found it easier to write off the victim.

We, us, society, are to blame for them getting away with it. Because we really don't care about the least fortunate in society.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 24 Nov 16 4.52pm

Originally posted by elgrande

Most normal people take the press with a pinch of salt,I tend to make my own mind up about things.
There is no real difference between right wing rags and left wing rags,they print what they feel their particular following want to hear.
And as for the Asian (Muslim) child sex gangs I haven't said they are all Muslim, what I meant is that it went on for years because the authorities were to scared to tackle it for fear being classed as racist.
And that in itself is wrong to the core.

Odd, because during that time the police have been regularly accused of being racist, and had racist complaints held up.

Couldn't possibly be because they, like society in general, didn't really have any incentive or desire to pursue the case, or bring them to the media.

Just like Savile, as long as you pick the right victims, you're protected by the general indifference of society to the least fortunate.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Nov 16 4.59pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I think its important to blame ISIS when its ISIS' fault, rather than blaming Muslims as a whole. Same way that someone like Muir isn't the far right, he's on the fringe of the far right (probably associated with National Action rather than Britain First) - And he'd be their second political motivated murderer.

There is a massive gulf between groups like UKIP and the BNP, EDL, Britain First and then them and National Action / Combat 18 et al. Much as there is between people being Muslims and being ISIS.

National Action have adopted Muir's 'Death to Traitors, Freedom for Britian' as their moto and are a 'direct action' group.

It would be erroneous to suggest people like Muir are are anything more than a tiny minority of the far right. However they are definitely also more than a few loan wolfs.

The far right in the UK is about as poorly unified as the far left, maybe worse, consisting of numerous groups ranging from the more political to the militant minded (and in between).

Its important to remember that whilst groups like the BNP and EDL have some fascist and neo-Nazi members and similarities, they aren't. Not in the way groups like National Action, The Infidels (related to the National Front) and Combat 18 who openly embrace Fascism and National Socialist political beliefs at their core.

They might only number a few hundred or so members across the UK (probably not much more than 1000 or so).


Edited by jamiemartin721 (24 Nov 2016 4.02pm)


At the end of the day if you are short of a few screws then you can live in Nazi fantasy or believe you are Luke Skywalker. It is all deviant behavior.
My point is that the national news is painting a false picture of Fascist influence in Britain which is cobblers. The ISIS influence is demonstrably different since their members are active in actual wide scale military action and do represent a genuine threat to large numbers of people. We cannot on the one hand have a media who plays this down and at the same time plays up Fascism. Playing them both down in the interests of public order is understandable but what we see on TV news is propaganda plain and simple.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 24 Nov 16 5.00pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Odd, because during that time the police have been regularly accused of being racist, and had racist complaints held up.

Couldn't possibly be because they, like society in general, didn't really have any incentive or desire to pursue the case, or bring them to the media.

Just like Savile, as long as you pick the right victims, you're protected by the general indifference of society to the least fortunate.

I take your point Jamie, but the local councils were also complicit in the way they failed to deal with these cases,and councillors who have now retired/left have said as much.
And does that make it right on either case no,children should be protected no matter from who ever.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 24 Nov 16 5.02pm

Originally posted by elgrande

Most normal people take the press with a pinch of salt,I tend to make my own mind up about things.
There is no real difference between right wing rags and left wing rags,they print what they feel their particular following want to hear.
And as for the Asian (Muslim) child sex gangs I haven't said they are all Muslim, what I meant is that it went on for years because the authorities were to scared to tackle it for fear being classed as racist.
And that in itself is wrong to the core.


So rather than blaming police ineptitude the drip drip of Muslim rape gangs leads to Muslims being vilified rather than the Police.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Nov 16 5.04pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Be honest. If it was a Muslim extremist that killed Jo Cox, the conviction would have been all over the front pages of the mail for days.

The BBC go out of their way... Do you have any specific examples other than the mostly Muslim rape gangs? Were are the figures to say rape gangs are mostly Muslim.

You say certain papers print things that are over hyped. I'd say they print inflammatory nonsense cleverly dressed up as fact that is meant to instill fear and hate among the readership. find someone to hate or blame when it's those that are in charge that are responsible for the s*** state of affairs. Orwell had it right with the 3 minutes hate in 1984.

Orwell certainly has it right about the left wing.

You seem obsessed with the Daily Mail, like it is the only biased Newspaper. So The Guaridan is not biased then? Newspaper bias is about selling papers but the Television news used to be about news not propaganda.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (24 Nov 2016 5.05pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Nov 16 5.06pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset


So rather than blaming police ineptitude the drip drip of Muslim rape gangs leads to Muslims being vilified rather than the Police.

So the police are to blame for the murder of Jo Cox then?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 24 Nov 16 5.08pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset


So rather than blaming police ineptitude the drip drip of Muslim rape gangs leads to Muslims being vilified rather than the Police.

Oh for f***ed sake,you really are a prat sometimes,drip drip.
There are huge amount of cases all around the country involving Muslim gangs.
But you are right the police and the councils were inept,but they were scared to bring it to the public eye through fear of being classed racist..probably by people like you.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 26 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > News bias?