No, you agreed with the original proposition that entry should be be put on hold for Islamic immigration.

"definite yes from me" you said in answer to the OPs question

So that ban would include 3 million US citizens (sportsmen, businessmen, academics,etc), 70,000 Irish citizens, 1 million Canadians, 200,000 Japanese and a massive other country list that goes on and on who also have muslims as part of their population make-up.

They are not all 'arabs'.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

So, you've stopped all muslim immigration. What are you going to do about those homegrown radicalised terrorists that have been responsible for nearly all the major terrorist attacks in recent times?

I don't think you read the post from Mapletree correctly. He was (obviously sarcastically) calling on banning US police officers because of the number of people they kill, you are the one that assumed he meant black people.

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

In fairness, in terms of Germany, racists do have a rather black history, where as rapists haven't really organised a country with a view to a 1000 years of power

It is a price worth paying, IS using refugee crisis to get terrorists in country x - because its a really stupid way to move operatives around. Obviously you have to screen and process all asylum applicants, but I think people seriously misunderstand how many Muslims are not actually anti-IS etc but how many are actually in the front line fighting against Islamists like IS (as well as fleeing from them).

We can't win a war by alienating our key ally in that war.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Banning Muslims – good idea, while we are at it ban Sikhs, they are aggressive buggers and some Muslims might be pretend to be Sikhs. You can’t be too careful. Then the Catholics, don’t forget the Spanish inquisition, 30 year war and of course closer to home Northern Ireland. Also Hitler was a catholic so let’s ban Germans (and Austrians) and their cars too. I am sure there's a few more we could exclude as well

Its important to remember that IS aren't just about blowing up people, they do have a coherent strategic goal, the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate, and see themselves as drawn into a conflict with the west as we see that, rightly, as unacceptable.

Groups like Al-Quaeda and IS don't really give to many f**ks about the UK, other than the NATO engagement in the conflict in Syria. They're much more interested in countries like Saudi Arabia, Jordan.

Whilst some who support them from the UK have ideas about a Sharia Law UK under strict Islamic laws, IS core command likely see that as a convenient source of supporters and recruiters - and an means of striking back against the bombings by NATO aircraft.

Of course for us, the ideal situation is for our Jyhadi inspired troublemakers and potential future terrorists, to travel to Syria, and get killed, disillusioned etc. Problem is, those that don't will come back. In some ways it may have been better to not remotely try to prevent people travelling to fight for IS, as it would have made them easier to identify....

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]