You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Panama Papers
November 27 2024 4.07am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Panama Papers

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

  

chris123 Flag hove actually 07 Apr 16 8.13pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

Its sad but as I see it it will blow over and be a nothing story in a week or so, it just doesn't suit those who run the press to keep the story out there. Those who should be held accountable won't be.

Disagree - this is of global interest and will run for some time and US regulators will be taking a look.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnno42000 Flag 07 Apr 16 8.25pm Send a Private Message to johnno42000 Add johnno42000 as a friend

I wonder if Cameron's middle name is B'Stard?

[Link]

Edited by johnno42000 (07 Apr 2016 8.26pm)

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnfirewall Flag 08 Apr 16 1.39pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Dave invested in a fund registered offshore and paid CGT when selling his shares. Non news.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 08 Apr 16 2.32pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by johnfirewall

Dave invested in a fund registered offshore and paid CGT when selling his shares. Non news.

Pretty much that TBH

Makes me laugh the hypocrisy of all those bemoaning the right to privacy over say the iPhone cracking issue and yet scream for openness and demand to know other peoples personal situations when it suits.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
-TUX- Flag Alphabettispaghetti 08 Apr 16 2.37pm Send a Private Message to -TUX- Add -TUX- as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Pretty much that TBH

Makes me laugh the hypocrisy of all those bemoaning the right to privacy over say the iPhone cracking issue and yet scream for openness and demand to know other peoples personal situations when it suits.

But didn't Dave himself call for transparency?
He should do the decent thing and resign. But he won't.

 


Time to move forward together.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 08 Apr 16 2.39pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Pretty much that TBH

Makes me laugh the hypocrisy of all those bemoaning the right to privacy over say the iPhone cracking issue and yet scream for openness and demand to know other peoples personal situations when it suits.

£30K and only £20K profit, there were bigger bogus expense claims from MPs. And repayments enforced on two party leaders at the time, neither of which were called Dave.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 08 Apr 16 2.40pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by -TUX-

But didn't Dave himself call for transparency?
He should do the decent thing and resign. But he won't.

What's not transparent? They were declared in their tax returns.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 08 Apr 16 2.48pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by -TUX-

But didn't Dave himself call for transparency?
He should do the decent thing and resign. But he won't.

He did...and he's been transparent...admittedly after being pushed some more.

as with anything...if you don't have anything to hide then what's the issue.

it'll be interesting to see if others now do the same

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 08 Apr 16 3.07pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

£30K and only £20K profit, there were bigger bogus expense claims from MPs. And repayments enforced on two party leaders at the time, neither of which were called Dave.

Agreed...again that's another issue...people baying for blood in the vain hope that their target has fouled up; even when there's actually nothing awry with what's gone on.

It simply increases the pack mentality as well as the ferver that accompanies it, all following like sheep without an original thought between them, and then they melt away into the shadows (without an apology or acknowledgement that actually everything was above board) when it seems that due taxes have been paid on it according to the law...so nuff said.

Now; as for those scallywags that used the firm to create 'shells' to money launder and avoid tax...that's another issue. These are the individuals that people should be pressurising.

What we all need is a global tax system that shines lights in ALL the corners removing the ability for tax havens and 'vehicles' that take advantage of loopholes to exist.

This is seemingly the thin end of the wedge...but there's plenty mileage left in it...just not where certain people riding on its coat tails would wish it to be though.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
-TUX- Flag Alphabettispaghetti 08 Apr 16 3.23pm Send a Private Message to -TUX- Add -TUX- as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

He did...and he's been transparent...admittedly after being pushed some more.

as with anything...if you don't have anything to hide then what's the issue.

it'll be interesting to see if others now do the same

The PM shouldn't, imo, need to be pushed at all.
And no, i'm not baying for his blood but i do believe that 'financial arrangements' such as this should be public knowledge the moment anyone becomes an MP.

 


Time to move forward together.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 08 Apr 16 3.34pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

What's not transparent? They were declared in their tax returns.

Were they Stu? He was just below the threshold for CGT so I would not expect him to have to declare anything.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 08 Apr 16 4.00pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Were they Stu? He was just below the threshold for CGT so I would not expect him to have to declare anything.

I'm fairly sure he'd have to do self-assessment return, in which case:



If you don’t have anything to report:

If you’re not registered for Self Assessment you don’t need to do anything.

If you’re registered for Self Assessment you must still fill in the capital gains section of your tax return.

Edited by Stuk (08 Apr 2016 4.01pm)

Edited by Stuk (08 Apr 2016 4.01pm)

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Panama Papers