This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 03 Apr 14 9.12pm | |
---|---|
If Sunderland stay up by only a point or two there'll be law suits a plenty. Not heard the last of this me thinks
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 03 Apr 14 9.35pm | |
---|---|
As soon as I saw it I thought the premier league would bottle it and just issue a fine. The president for football league clubs and lower divisions is a points deduction and it should be the same. Having said that, I'd prefer to beat them on merit rather than a technicallity.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bitter Harpenden 03 Apr 14 9.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote jeeagles at 03 Apr 2014 9.35pm
As soon as I saw it I thought the premier league would bottle it and just issue a fine. The president for football league clubs and lower divisions is a points deduction and it should be the same. Having said that, I'd prefer to beat them on merit rather than a technicallity. Doesn't it just sum up the Premier League? The only thing that matters in the PL is money, so the only penalty they issue is financial.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sg Bilko Deurne Holland 04 Apr 14 8.14am | |
---|---|
Talk about double standards. 2007 AFC Wimbledon were deducted 18pts for exactly the same reason when they fielded Jermaine Darlington without international clearance. We were deducted the point gained for fielding Rui Fonte against Sheff U in 2009 when his registration ran out the day before the game. Also did they not knock MK Dons out of the League Cup with him in the side, they surely must have grounds for complaint.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Apr 14 9.13am | |
---|---|
There is a slight difference in the Sunderland case, in that they had international clearance when he joined the club, they sent him on loan to a German, and then failed to realise they needed international clearance again when he returned, even though he was in the same contract period. Whilst I'd like them to be deducted points, I don't think it really is the same as other cases. Especially as it was Sunderland who first alerted to the Premiership to the situation. During that period they gained one point and no advantage.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 04 Apr 14 9.15am | |
---|---|
Quote Southampton_Eagle at 03 Apr 2014 8.08pm
Quote Lucas Oliver at 03 Apr 2014 7.59pm
Happened to us a few years back - 1 pt deduction for fielding Rui Fonte against Sheff U in I think was a meaningless last game of the season. That was one game and a point deducted, would love the FA to deduct them pts.
Rui Fonte's loan period had expired.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 04 Apr 14 10.24am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Apr 2014 9.13am
There is a slight difference in the Sunderland case, in that they had international clearance when he joined the club, they sent him on loan to a German, and then failed to realise they needed international clearance again when he returned, even though he was in the same contract period. Whilst I'd like them to be deducted points, I don't think it really is the same as other cases. Especially as it was Sunderland who first alerted to the Premiership to the situation. During that period they gained one point and no advantage. It is a slight difference and I'm amazed that they were not deducted a point. That both sides have hushed it up for so long also raises questions. The fact that he wasn't any good and probably cost them more points is irrelevant. I don't for one moment think that the PL favour Sunderland over any other club but they (the PL) are more interested in not making a fuss and the money they can make out of it.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
andysmithcpfc1983 Selsdon 04 Apr 14 10.41am | |
---|---|
What made him ineligible? He has played in 7 league games since the start of February. 25 man squad is decided at the end of January isn't it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
andysmithcpfc1983 Selsdon 04 Apr 14 10.43am | |
---|---|
Quote andysmithcpfc1983 at 04 Apr 2014 10.41am
What made him ineligible? He has played in 7 league games since the start of February. 25 man squad is decided at the end of January isn't it? Hadn't seen JM's post before posting. Must pay more attention
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cheswickeagle 04 Apr 14 11.13am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
adrian b Landrindod, Wales 04 Apr 14 1.14pm | |
---|---|
Quote homes at 03 Apr 2014 7.47pm
Quote girvinator at 03 Apr 2014 7.46pm
Potentially, but to be honest I think it'll more likely be a hefty fine. How many points did they get with him I'm the side?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
adrian b Landrindod, Wales 04 Apr 14 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote jeeagles at 03 Apr 2014 9.35pm
As soon as I saw it I thought the premier league would bottle it and just issue a fine. The president for football league clubs and lower divisions is a points deduction and it should be the same. Having said that, I'd prefer to beat them on merit rather than a technicallity. The precedent is points deduction. But if they lose ,say, 3 points but are 4 points clear then they are OK with that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.