This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Dangermouse Hastings 02 Mar 14 9.20pm | |
---|---|
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.17pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.10pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 9.21pm)
That's Life |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 02 Mar 14 9.22pm | |
---|---|
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.18pm
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.11pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it. Can't deny that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 02 Mar 14 9.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.20pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.17pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.10pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Skillful thinking footballers. He likes his players to be workmanlike and able to follow instructions to the letter. He doesn't give them any freedom to express themselves and I base this on many years of watching the type of teams and football he produces.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 9.21pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
portlandpaul wallington 02 Mar 14 9.31pm | |
---|---|
On SSN TP actualy said that JT and Tommo (I guess that means Tom Ince) will be fined by the club for diving, and that JT went to to ref and apologised after the game. He said Chamakh was also guilty of diving but he did'nt say he was being fined along with the other two. IMO TP is a very good manager, his interviews are insinctive and professional, he clearly admits it was his fault in the first half. He changed it around and I say well done to him. Not many managers would admit they'd got things wrong and even less would stand up and say they their players were cheating. The more I see and hear from TP, the more impressed I have become.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Icepick Tony Chester 02 Mar 14 9.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.18pm
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.11pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it. Can't deny that. It doesn't upset me, the fact is we don't have players capable of playing that way. Burley tried and we got spanked, Holloway was the same and most of the time we got a thumping. Pulis is getting the best out of what he has, a side made up of very little cash and a few players actually of a Premier League standard. Have you noticed that unless it is dry and sunny 80% of our players need 2 touches to bring the ball under control or pass to a team mate? What we have is a group that lacks skill but has serious mental toughness that kind of makes up for it.
"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jordan555x Bromley 02 Mar 14 9.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.18pm
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.11pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it. Can't deny that.
It had me fooled too. It's the great footballing knowledge of Mr Tony Pulis at its best. The whole reason I wanted Tony Pulis as our manager is because I wanted a manager significantly clever'er tactically than most of the other managers in the PL not some foreign fella whose name sounds good but in reality isn't all that. Aitor Karanka comes to mind...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dangermouse Hastings 02 Mar 14 10.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.35pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 9.18pm
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 9.11pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 9.02pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 8.57pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 02 Mar 2014 8.22pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 7.31pm
Needs an excuse to drive out Chamakh, he really isn't a Pulis type of player. Didn't see Chamakh dive.
He must be one of the only players that Pulis has consistently started since he took over.
Edited by Dangermouse (02 Mar 2014 8.59pm) No, he accused him of diving today in the first half, no mention of the United game. How exactly is he not a Pulis type player? Furthermore, what is a Pulis type player? It just seems to be a phrase thrown around when someone doesn't get picked (see Moxey, Gayle, Bannan). Dangermouse just doesn't like Pulis, that is the end of it. Can't deny that. It doesn't upset me, the fact is we don't have players capable of playing that way. Burley tried and we got spanked, Holloway was the same and most of the time we got a thumping. Pulis is getting the best out of what he has, a side made up of very little cash and a few players actually of a Premier League standard. Have you noticed that unless it is dry and sunny 80% of our players need 2 touches to bring the ball under control or pass to a team mate? What we have is a group that lacks skill but has serious mental toughness that kind of makes up for it. We said the same under Coppell. Once we've established ourselves we will change, but after 4 years in the old first division and then the prem we didn't. Stoke fans were hoping the same and it didn't happen. He plays the way he plays and will sign the players that suit that style. I cannot help it, but I hate it as much as constantly passing sideways and my opinion will not change. As for people claimimg it was all part of the plan to be s***e and let Swansea wear themselves out...puleeese. Also that sit back and soak it up plan hasn't really worked so far this season has it?
That's Life |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Icepick Tony Chester 02 Mar 14 10.20pm | |
---|---|
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 10.00pm
We said the same under Coppell. Once we've established ourselves we will change, but after 4 years in the old first division and then the prem we didn't. Stoke fans were hoping the same and it didn't happen. He plays the way he plays and will sign the players that suit that style. I cannot help it, but I hate it as much as constantly passing sideways and my opinion will not change. As for people claimimg it was all part of the plan to be s***e and let Swansea wear themselves out...puleeese. Also that sit back and soak it up plan hasn't really worked so far this season has it? Well whatever TP plan has been this season I think we can all say it has worked, before he came in we were dead and buried, you cannot possibly say that now.
"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 02 Mar 14 10.21pm | |
---|---|
Hmmm...debating playing style at this time of the season in our league position ? I'm happy with any style that gives us a better chance of gaining the points we need to stay up. And I think that largely, TP is getting it right. As for diving...I thought Thomas hesitated that split second and the chance was gone and then he tried to win a penalty. Seen worse ( Ashley Young for example ). And when it comes to winning cheap free kicks / diving, I thought our players could learn a lot today from the opposition....they go to ground oh so easily, got what they deserved in the end.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7@burnley79 Battersea 03 Mar 14 1.26am | |
---|---|
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 10.20pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 10.00pm
We said the same under Coppell. Once we've established ourselves we will change, but after 4 years in the old first division and then the prem we didn't. Stoke fans were hoping the same and it didn't happen. He plays the way he plays and will sign the players that suit that style. I cannot help it, but I hate it as much as constantly passing sideways and my opinion will not change. As for people claimimg it was all part of the plan to be s***e and let Swansea wear themselves out...puleeese. Also that sit back and soak it up plan hasn't really worked so far this season has it? Well whatever TP plan has been this season I think we can all say it has worked, before he came in we were dead and buried, you cannot possibly say that now. Agreed Icepick, of course its worked at what point this season have we had the better possession. Therefore every match we have played, we soaked up more pressure than our opponents because they have the ball. Then we counter and on the occasion score and nick the points. TP knew what he had to work with as a team. He worked on the team spirit the team ethics, defending and how to counter at pace. Now we was never going to set this league alight with our squad, but what TP has done is maximise our strengths and consolidated them into a unit. Has hasn't played a long ball game and to the contrary Palace usually pass their way out of defence, so the Stoke style argument is cr-p. We was a mid table to play off championship side that punched way above our weight last season. Not 1 pundit gave us a chance to stay up, now not 1 of them same pundits are backing us to go down. Thats down to Tony Pulis and CPFC2010 whether you like it or not Dangermouse
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MikeT Burlington (Toronto Area) 03 Mar 14 5.01am | |
---|---|
Quote 7@burnley79 at 03 Mar 2014 1.26am
Quote Icepick Tony at 02 Mar 2014 10.20pm
Quote Dangermouse at 02 Mar 2014 10.00pm
We said the same under Coppell. Once we've established ourselves we will change, but after 4 years in the old first division and then the prem we didn't. Stoke fans were hoping the same and it didn't happen. He plays the way he plays and will sign the players that suit that style. I cannot help it, but I hate it as much as constantly passing sideways and my opinion will not change. As for people claimimg it was all part of the plan to be s***e and let Swansea wear themselves out...puleeese. Also that sit back and soak it up plan hasn't really worked so far this season has it? Well whatever TP plan has been this season I think we can all say it has worked, before he came in we were dead and buried, you cannot possibly say that now. Agreed Icepick, of course its worked at what point this season have we had the better possession. Therefore every match we have played, we soaked up more pressure than our opponents because they have the ball. Then we counter and on the occasion score and nick the points. TP knew what he had to work with as a team. He worked on the team spirit the team ethics, defending and how to counter at pace. Now we was never going to set this league alight with our squad, but what TP has done is maximise our strengths and consolidated them into a unit. Has hasn't played a long ball game and to the contrary Palace usually pass their way out of defence, so the Stoke style argument is cr-p. We was a mid table to play off championship side that punched way above our weight last season. Not 1 pundit gave us a chance to stay up, now not 1 of them same pundits are backing us to go down. Thats down to Tony Pulis and CPFC2010 whether you like it or not Dangermouse Couldn't agree more. Additionally, the argument that TP would stock Palace with Stoke-type players doesn't hold much water. He had the opportunity to bring in his own players in January. Ince, Ledley and Puncheon are hardly the prototypical neanderthals you might have expected. Secondly, Palace are currently 6th in the PL Fair Play Table. You'd expect us to be around 19th with Stoke if the intent was to emulate their style.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
maxipalace in a box 03 Mar 14 8.37am | |
---|---|
Thomas should be fined for not passing to cameron jerome who was in space in the box!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.