So if we happen to agree with a poster and support his views we are part of a sect. Ffs. Glazedallover was, imo, out of order but as I said he is entitled to his opinion.
I really can’t be ar**d to contribute to anything other than football related threads for a while. Shame some on here don’t contribute more to actual football threads.

Well don't look at me. I am all over the place on here, not just on the politics stuff.

In any case you make more sense on football threads.

I've yet to see you be objective on here.

Yeah, your opinion on your seat was objective....though you only acted in your own personal interest.

Yeah, your opinion on Brexit, was objective.....though you eventually declared a fiscal interest.

Actually far from being objective your opinions rarely appear to differ from what is best for you.

True objectivity is an impossibility of course but it's typical of your narcissism to claim it.

As for saying I'm in a sect....what? I don't even know where to begin with that one.

As for 'acolytes', really? Are people who agree with you 'acolytes'. If I agree with them am I their 'acolyte' as well. Seems more a cheap and easy insult.

Attacks on Wisbech aren't based upon facts but opinions....errr....anymore trite statements Maple?

This is an opinion forum you know.....So when he defends the Police actions over grooming gangs and their policy of silence and cover up to the public....and I attack this view that's somehow not valid in some way?

When he said he had heard about the grooming gangs twenty years ago yet had no issue in that post....and I attack that then that's not valid as you have some insistence that this isn't 'factual'? Tell me Maple, are your criticisms invalid because they aren't 'factual'?

I guess because there's little personal interest in reality you just don't give a damn.

He's on your social loony left that doesn't affect your pocket so you're happy to support him.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Dec 2020 10.23am)

I can believe in the first two sentences and probably agree with it to an extent. I believe you think the third sentence...but I can't agree with you thus far.

A principle isn't really a principle until it costs you....and in my view I don't believe you'd willingly allow that to happen.

A bit of a cheap shot but probably more accurate than not.

Mmmmm...I bet there is more to that.

However, if that's true I tip my hat.

Well, I'll accept an important exception in this case.