This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
W12 16 Dec 20 11.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
How tediously predictable this reply is! It's full of the anticipated cliches, misunderstandings and jingoism. Wow, you can read my mind Wishy! Empire has everything to do with it! Not during the days of Empire itself but because it's part of a continuum which leads from yesterday, through today and onto tomorrow. We ruled half the world and that half thought of us as home. We gave the world it's international language. Through independence, national pride has grown, but we are still regarded by many as where they want to be. We made commitments, which emotionally still matter. Bollocks we did. We left the countries we ruled better off and we owe them nothing. We destroyed our empire fighting two wars that were started by others and mostly based on a bunch of lies. With English as their second, or sometimes first language we are where many people target, even if we are often seen as a stepping stone on a passage west. That doesn't account for all of course because we also accept those needing our humanitarian assistance. People that you clearly despise but most of us are proud to be able to help. We don't "always" do it! We play our part, as we should. The only people I despise are people like you that dictate mass immigration onto a majority that don't want it. I want human bio diversity and a continuation of distinct cultures not global homogeneity. I also want my children to be safe and have a homeland of their own. Everyone should be entitled to that. You don't care about our reputation for honest dealing and fairness? Shame on you. I do. From a practical point of view our trustworthiness is one of our only remaining bankable assets. Playing dirty with people's lives is a pretty efficient way to destroy that. Which is why cutting the foreign aid budget is madness. What's fair about UK taxpayers paying money to foreign governments that are largely corrupt when we have huge numbers of our own people sleeping on the streets or in poverty? Train our own workers! That old mantra! If only it were that simple. Our unemployment rate varies but remove the unemployable and there is no-where near enough slack to provide what we need if we are to sustain a growing economy, and grow we must to be able to repay the huge debts we are running up. We don't have the education system or the adult training places available and it would take decades to turn that around. Do it and then more UK workers could move up a stratum so we would then need immigration to fill the jobs they were doing. We need cleaners. We need carers. Just as much as we need doctors and lawyers. We are running up huge debs because we have a welfare state that's trying to cater for huge numbers of people that are not English. Not only are these people a huge net drain on our economy but to add insult to injury remittances (mostly benefits money wired "home" sustains large parts of economies like Somalia. The "we want the country of our forefathers back" argument is pathetic. My Dad would not have wanted it back. He would have wanted us to progress and face the modern world, and not hide from it like a coward. Your little acorn didn't fall far from the tree then. We had a supersonic airliner back in the 60's yet since mass immigration all we have is phone that spies on us and cities that all look the same filled with people that don;t give a s*** about each other. How is that progress? The constant references to "mass" immigration is a red herring. What's important is what we are doing now and whether it matches our needs and responsibilities. What happened in the past is done. It needs to be managed for sure but it now must be accepted and not allowed to dominate. Living in the past is a pointless exercise. There goes your actual liberalism shining through Oh and here is the Dominion voting system in all it's glory: There are videos of the Machine in operation and some of the shocking ways it can be used to manipulate elections but the "liberals" at YouTube have taken them down.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Dec 20 10.00pm | |
---|---|
Trump has made some interesting military appointments recently....
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Dec 20 11.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
Oh and here is the Dominion voting system in all it's glory: [Link] There are videos of the Machine in operation and some of the shocking ways it can be used to manipulate elections but the "liberals" at YouTube have taken them down. It's not only me that thinks this is just more bs designed to keep the Trump base fired up. If there was any real evidence don't you think a Judge somewhere might agree? Even the soon to be ex AG Barr says there isn't. I'll ignore the rest of your response. It's all pointless repetitive and well-rehearsed right-wing tropes that add nothing anyone's knowledge.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 16 Dec 20 11.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's not only me that thinks this is just more bs designed to keep the Trump base fired up. If there was any real evidence don't you think a Judge somewhere might agree? Even the soon to be ex AG Barr says there isn't. I'll ignore the rest of your response. It's all pointless repetitive and well-rehearsed right-wing tropes that add nothing anyone's knowledge. Yeah it’s all getting a bit sad and boring now TBH If there was even a shred of evidence of what would be one of the biggest scams in world history it would have been out in the open by now. Not heard a peep from the Q contingent lately. Funny that. What’s way more interesting is what Trump does next
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 16 Dec 20 11.37pm | |
---|---|
Also, it was Republicans that voted down election security measures and funding again and again, so that doesn't fit the narrative very well [Link] I have been mulling over your justification for violence the other day in the face of an election result and political happenings that you don't like. You ought to calm down and get a sense of perspective. Realise what's actually important in life in a holistic sense. It extends somewhat beyond 'being white'. Start listening and relating to those actually ,rather than virtually, around you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 16 Dec 20 11.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Yeah it’s all getting a bit sad and boring now TBH If there was even a shred of evidence of what would be one of the biggest scams in world history it would have been out in the open by now. Not heard a peep from the Q contingent lately. Funny that. What’s way more interesting is what Trump does next
No wonder the options on the menu are so woeful. Liberal or conservative, people get the s***ty government they deserve. Edited by BlueJay (17 Dec 2020 12.32am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 17 Dec 20 12.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
I hope you are not being Islamaphobic my friend? I don't care which brand of fairytale an individual adopts until it reaches a point that endangers others. With that in mind I don't for a moment think that all religions are created equal, as in at certain points in time some clearly bring far more problems than others. Is someone listening to a 'Headspace' meditation of the same 'risk profile' as an individual downloading sermons that declare hate for the west? Of course not. PC b0llocks to suggest otherwise.
Edited by BlueJay (17 Dec 2020 3.04am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 17 Dec 20 12.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Trump has made some interesting military appointments recently.... I'm out of the loop. What do you see coming down the pipe? My inclination is to think that it's a very bad idea for a President on the way out of the door to make any major move. But out of curiosity I'm certainly interested in what fireworks could go off before January.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Dec 20 1.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I'm out of the loop. What do you see coming down the pipe? My inclination is to think that it's a very bad idea for a President on the way out of the door to make any major move. But out of curiosity I'm certainly interested in what fireworks could go off before January. Well, lets look at what we know for sure. Trump thinks he's been robbed and cheated, apparently over ninety percent of republican voters do as well....though I suspect it's lower than that. Trump has replaced several generals with loyalists in the last month. I think he's giving himself options and I think he's considered a military intervention. Do I think he'll do it....I'd say I'm 70/30 on him not doing it, due to all the problems that flow from it and the fact that Trump only ever did thirty percent of what comes out of his mouth. But hey....who knows. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Dec 2020 1.14am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 17 Dec 20 1.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, lets look at what we know for sure. Trump thinks he's been robbed and cheated, apparently over ninety percent of republican voters do as well....though I suspect it's lower than that. Trump has replaced several generals with loyalists in the last month. I think he's giving himself options and I think he's considered a military intervention. Do I think he'll do it....I'd say I'm 70/30 on him not doing it, due to all the problems that flow from it. But hey....who knows. I'm with you in terms of the possibilities, but at the same time with regard to the election, facts don't care about feelings. He clearly lost the election, just as Democrats clearly lost to him previously (and equally couldn't accept it). Let's not get drawn into the Alice in Wonderful of it all. What I will say is that Trump would've handily won if it hadn't been for covid-19 - or his reaction to it. So, really in that regard he was rather unlucky. I agree with you in that I have zero idea of what he might do or try to as the clock ticks down. In a way given his age and his legal issues why not just toss the coin? The most unfortunate part of this presidency I feel is that Trump is a 'maverick' but at the same time soaked in self interest and making a buck. It's a shame that a true maverick never gets behind the gears of government, with a genuine interest in the people. I don't mean that in a happy clappy 'we are the world' sense either, just actually hard working and working class Americans. It does seem like there is an achievable sweet spot that would avoid an 'open door' outlook, but at the same time doesn't demonise those already there. Problem being GOP and Dems alike move to such polar opposites that good sense is never a winning formula. It really doesn't benefit the country to lurch from one extreme to the other because then, rather comically, both sides end up lumbered with long term realities they don't want to deal with! All of this does benefit those holding the swagbag though. Something to think about. Edited by BlueJay (17 Dec 2020 1.50am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Dec 20 3.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I'm with you in terms of the possibilities, but at the same time with regard to the election, facts don't care about feelings. He clearly lost the election, just as Democrats clearly lost to him previously (and equally couldn't accept it). Let's not get drawn into the Alice in Wonderful of it all. What I will say is that Trump would've handily won if it hadn't been for covid-19 - or his reaction to it. So, really in that regard he was rather unlucky. I agree with you in that I have zero idea of what he might do or try to as the clock ticks down. In a way given his age and his legal issues why not just toss the coin? The most unfortunate part of this presidency I feel is that Trump is a 'maverick' but at the same time soaked in self interest and making a buck. It's a shame that a true maverick never gets behind the gears of government, with a genuine interest in the people. I don't mean that in a happy clappy 'we are the world' sense either, just actually hard working and working class Americans. It does seem like there is an achievable sweet spot that would avoid an 'open door' outlook, but at the same time doesn't demonise those already there. Problem being GOP and Dems alike move to such polar opposites that good sense is never a winning formula. It really doesn't benefit the country to lurch from one extreme to the other because then, rather comically, both sides end up lumbered with long term realities they don't want to deal with! All of this does benefit those holding the swagbag though. Something to think about. Edited by BlueJay (17 Dec 2020 1.50am) Facts certainly don't care about feelings, that's an old right wing meme.....but what life has taught me is what turned out to be more important was that 'feelings don't care about facts'. What's you are saying is sensible of course. In a political environment that was sensible no one would be where we are in the US. We could write a book on the differences between the US and Europe but there is no doubt that really unhealthy levels of polarisation were encouraged by parties.....I remember the tea party's loathing of Obama (who I didn't like) which went to really over the top levels. I remember Bush Jnr being called a Nazi...which is funny as the Democrats now embrace him as a never Trumper. All of this was aided by social media's propensity to divide (it's a lot easier to demonise and misunderstand in text rather than face to face) and that's played it's part...along with the left's use of identity politics (inspired by increasing demographic change) there has been a significant widening of the gap between the parties....of course antifa/blm/proud boys are all symptoms of of this gap and while they might have all started off differently they are now associated as the 'rough hands' for their parties. All that was unthinkable when I was growing up. The days of reaching across the bench and making deals of mutual interest went out of the window and even if some of the politicians tried it now they will be castigated by their base as traitors. What i think about it all really depends upon which hat I'm wearing.....if the US doesn't split up (which is probable at some point due to the 1st and especially 2nd amendments) I see America's long term future as a majority hispanic and socialist nation....a corporate and social model similar to China....who will be a significant influence. But to the here and now....Will Trump look to make that break and go for it?....that's wearing another hat. I definitely think he's considered it....why else change those generals. When I think about what's best for him right now and ignore any moral concerns I wouldn't go for the coop. He could slip away, claim to have been cheated (there is a point there about covid and mail in ballots) and be could be a major figure (on the declining right) until he kicks the bucket. He has powerful lawyers and I really don't think it's in Democratic interests to pursue him or indeed let their friends do it. A coop is an all or nothing strategy which is unlikely to succeed long term....he'd be seen as illegitimate and countries would break off relations....at least for a couple of years....that's a powerful disincentive even for elite republicans. They would have to believe he'd succeed and I don't think most of them want a Franco figure and a major risk of jail....I think the base are strong for Trump but the republican elites are far weaker and he'd need them both to pull it off. Then again, if he thinks he's going to jail.... It's hard to be certain with Trump....because he loves the importance...and if you wanted..to go down in history you'd go for it. On the other hand I just don't think he has that Castro/Hitler 'all or nothing' aspect to him. A quirky thought I know, but those two had made far less enemies on their own sides. If he tried it he'd paint it as 'saving America from socialism' and justify it on the mail in ballots and so on. I wonder if you can get odds at the bookies. It would be a major event in all our lives....spicier than a spice burger with extra lashings of spice. 70/30 against. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Dec 2020 3.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Dec 20 4.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by croydon proud
As i used to say to stranded uber customers who didn"t fancy paying the 10x fare surcharge uber were charging when the trains were down, you get what you pay for! Which is a lot worse than the £35 my mate was quoted online for a black cab from charing x to Russel square last week. What's that 3 or 4 miles?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.