This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jun 17 5.00pm | |
---|---|
I get it the beds were too high so they had to be lowered.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 02 Jun 17 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Just to point out we were never 'given' money under the Marshall Plan. It was a loan subject to 50 annual repayments. The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 02 Jun 17 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
I get it the beds were too high so they had to be lowered.
Cucking was right.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 02 Jun 17 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence. And to rebuild economies to give the Americans someone to trade with. Whatever the reasons, Europe would have been f*cked without it. Clever Americans.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 02 Jun 17 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Irony alert: Andrew Lansley, the shadow health secretary, said the Government's financial mismanagement had forced hospitals to make cuts which could risk lives. "These bed cuts were financially driven: the sharp rise in the numbers closed happened at a time when the health service was under desperate pressure to clear a massive deficit."
What's certainly the case now is that the NHS needs significant investment. We have far lower doctor ratios than most other OECD countries, declining nurse numbers and more and more demand. The % of GDP spent on health is also very low in international terms. If you were to fall ill you'd be well advised to hop on the Eurostar to Paris where you will received much better healthcare (I speak from personal experience). France has more doctors, more nurses and more investment.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jun 17 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence. In case of confusion there were 2 the North America loan and later the Marshall plan. Gordon Brown paid it up in 2006. Labour chancellors try to repay debt as we know
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 02 Jun 17 5.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I wouldn't expect you or your party to really take the NHS seriously. All in this book. Most problems have been over exacerbated by the Tories, many Tory MPs have vested interests in Private heathcare.
You can't have it both ways. Also. Lots of name calling on here by various tossers. Is it necessary? Attachment: 14964196497842075745551.jpg (5,987.32Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 02 Jun 17 5.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Cucking was right. No the nurses were finding it too difficult to get capitalist fatties into bed so the beds had to be lowered to make it easier.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 02 Jun 17 5.18pm | |
---|---|
Is steeleye off his medication?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 02 Jun 17 5.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
All in this book. Most problems have been over exacerbated by the Tories, many Tory MPs have vested interests in Private heathcare.
You can't have it both ways. In this instance, yes. Absolutely. I've not called you any names other than 'gusset', gusset. And even then, that was only when I was cross with you. I actually believe that you are an integral part of this site. A challenging opponent.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 02 Jun 17 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I wouldn't expect you or your party to really take the NHS seriously. In terms of pure data public spending on health the facts are: 1997: 4.73% of GDP Make of that what you will. Pure data though can be misleading. Also number of doctors per 1000 population: 1997: 1.85
2000 (earliest available): 9.01
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 02 Jun 17 5.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
In this instance, yes. Absolutely. I've not called you any names other than 'gusset', gusset. And even then, that was only when I was cross with you. I actually believe that you are an integral part of this site. A challenging opponent.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.