You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
September 19 2024 11.09pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 290 of 435 < 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 >

  

Part Time James Flag 14 Jul 23 1.54pm Send a Private Message to Part Time James Add Part Time James as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

According to an Italian judge this week, if it lasts less than 10 seconds it doesn't count as a grope.

I imagine that a few Italian males' eyes lit up at that

My anecdote about a middle aged lady groping me during a Gary Numan gig is now invalid then, as I would estimate I lasted a maximum of 6 seconds.

 




Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
becky Flag over the moon 14 Jul 23 2.31pm Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by Part Time James

My anecdote about a middle aged lady groping me during a Gary Numan gig is now invalid then, as I would estimate I lasted a maximum of 6 seconds.

How many of those 6 seconds was spent finding the 'target'?

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jul 23 3.12pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

We had a nice rest from you for a couple of weeks, with much calmer and reasonable debate. Now your volume of posts and bombast are back to pre-lockout levels. I expect you will reach a point where you start answering your own posts.

The rest was welcomed by me. So much so Ii extended it by a week whilst still observing. It might have been calmer, when people are massaging egos it tends to be calm, but reasonable it wasn’t. The bias and prejudices were every bit as evident as when I post too.

Perhaps you haven’t noticed but I only posting in this thread, simply because the integrity of the BBC and its importance is something close to my heart and I find the kind of attacks indulged in here to be both distasteful and ignorant.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jul 23 3.19pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Depends if you understood them. Viz, Johnny Rotten wanting to kill people in films or real life.

I got what he meant but the claim made in the headline and supported by you simply wasn’t by what he actually said or what the BBC did. He didn’t “out” Savile. He, like others, voiced concerns and disliked him. As, by the way, so did I. The BBC did remove him but not because of anything he said about Savile. He was pretty OTT himself and was deliberately controversial. They acted for those reasons.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 14 Jul 23 3.23pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I got what he meant but the claim made in the headline and supported by you simply wasn’t by what he actually said or what the BBC did. He didn’t “out” Savile. He, like others, voiced concerns and disliked him. As, by the way, so did I. The BBC did remove him but not because of anything he said about Savile. He was pretty OTT himself and was deliberately controversial. They acted for those reasons.

His voicing of concerns obviously shows he'd heard about Savile's activities. If he'd heard what are the chances of the BBC not having done so?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jul 23 3.26pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

2011? A bit out of date.

Survey's are always a bit dodgy and can be skewed as I said previously a better barometer is the real world attitude to the licence fee. Currently more than 20m of us pay it because we more or less have to. However that number is falling year on year largely due to demographics, lack of interest and the cost of living crisis rather than any defund the BBC campaign.

Perhaps in a few years non payment and the admin cost of collecting it will become a bigger issue which is why the BBC is so keen to replace the licence fee with some form of broadband tax (like VAT) and have someone else collect it.

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jul 2023 9.18am)

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jul 2023 9.19am)

So how do you establish a “world attitude “ unless you survey? You just have a mess of conflicting opinions.

I don’t have a problem with replacing the licence fee with another way of funding. So long as we all pay and it keeps the BBC independent of government.

Why should we all pay? Because we all benefit, whether we use it or not.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jul 23 3.32pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

His voicing of concerns obviously shows he'd heard about Savile's activities. If he'd heard what are the chances of the BBC not having done so?

Heard or just felt him to be creepy? That’s what most felt. As I did. This was at a time when parents were actively pushing their children towards him in the hope of getting noticed. There simply wasn’t the same awareness there is now.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 14 Jul 23 3.39pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Heard or just felt him to be creepy? That’s what most felt. As I did. This was at a time when parents were actively pushing their children towards him in the hope of getting noticed. There simply wasn’t the same awareness there is now.

Maybe he'd heard from one of the 100+ witnesses at the enquiry.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 14 Jul 23 3.48pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The rest was welcomed by me. So much so Ii extended it by a week whilst still observing. It might have been calmer, when people are massaging egos it tends to be calm, but reasonable it wasn’t. The bias and prejudices were every bit as evident as when I post too.

Perhaps you haven’t noticed but I only posting in this thread, simply because the integrity of the BBC and its importance is something close to my heart and I find the kind of attacks indulged in here to be both distasteful and ignorant.

You seem to find any opinion that you don't agree with as distasteful and ignorant and half the time you seem to attack any opinion just for the sake of it - it's all very odd.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 14 Jul 23 4.05pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

So how do you establish a “world attitude “ unless you survey? You just have a mess of conflicting opinions.

I don’t have a problem with replacing the licence fee with another way of funding. So long as we all pay and it keeps the BBC independent of government.

Why should we all pay? Because we all benefit, whether we use it or not.

Ok I'll ask AGAIN how do I benefit from the BBC?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 14 Jul 23 4.14pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

You seem to find any opinion that you don't agree with as distasteful and ignorant and half the time you seem to attack any opinion just for the sake of it - it's all very odd.

Obviously not much going on in Truro to fill the days, so trolling helps while away the hours

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 14 Jul 23 5.07pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Part Time James

My anecdote about a middle aged lady groping me during a Gary Numan gig is now invalid then, as I would estimate I lasted a maximum of 6 seconds.

I’ve got to admire your stamina. A sniff of Chanel and it’s wipe up time

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 290 of 435 < 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)