This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mapletree Croydon 20 Apr 20 12.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
You're no doubt far more knowledgeable in this area than I am, but I do have an elderly relative who suffers from dementia and she has live-in help. Considering the gravity of the current situation, I think that the government should've set out guidelines that basically lead to far fewer people going in and out of these buildings. Covid-19 is fast spreading through a very significant number of care homes to devastating effect, so contrary to their intended purpose, they have become unsafe environments for the elderly at this time. If I had an elderly relative in a care home right now, I'd strongly considering removing them. Whereas I would be avoiding personal carers providing support in the individual's home. Far less secure.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Apr 20 12.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
If the agencies charge so much why not increase the salaries so staff will work full time. Must be cheaper even with sick,holidays and pension etc. As I said my involvement was 20 years ago but I don't suppose it is so different today. Agency workers dictate their own terms on which shifts they will accept, or refuse. They don't have anyone allocating shifts. They pick and choose. The rate they get paid might only be a little more than what they might earn per hour if directly employed but the agency always charges a hefty premium. The rates vary on how unpopular the shift time is. Even 20 years ago we were paying £50 per hour for a night shift over Christmas, when the regular staff would have been £7 or £8 max for standard shifts. Of course we offered bonuses for unsocial hours but those can be slippery slopes. It is always a balancing act.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 20 Apr 20 12.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Yes private and governmental alike it really does look that we were incredibly naive and consequently unprepared for what was winging its way towards us. Not sure that's true We have comprehensive BCP. But there is a reliance on the next person up the chain, if you are told PPE will be supplied to you then you really have to take that at face value
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Apr 20 12.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Whereas I would be avoiding personal carers providing support in the individual's home. Far less secure. The death rate for those receiving domiciliary care is an issue not yet even being discussed. My wife was working with the Community Nurses in Jan and Feb and whilst they always used PPE by way of aprons and gloves, masks were not regularly worn. The daily visits that many people received from their carers often involved no PPE at all. These carers will serve many people in a shift. I suffered a strange bout of an unusual illness in late Jan, which put me in bed for 2 days. Dry cough, a little fever, lethargy. Soon passed, but it made me wonder. It would though be unsurprising to learn that those receiving their care at home, and their careers, aren't also suffering a, so far unreported, surge in deaths.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 20 Apr 20 12.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That nurse that was crying into her video camera a few weeks ago saying that she couldn't get any food said that she had just finished a 48 hour shift
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 20 Apr 20 1.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That nurse that was crying into her video camera a few weeks ago saying that she couldn't get any food said that she had just finished a 48 hour shift Ah yes, Nurses don't need to sleep between March and October. We don't have Nurses any more.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 20 Apr 20 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Whereas I would be avoiding personal carers providing support in the individual's home. Far less secure. My relative receives NHS care from what is essentially a live in carer. In a situation like that it's certainly safer than being in a home. I'm not saying that it feasible for all people though of course, as it would take up generous resources. My gist is that with the best will in the world, covid-19 is very contagious and if a home has multiple carers coming in and out, it's a matter of if not when. Regular testing would help mitigate that to a degree, but it's still a concerning environment for people to be at this time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 20 Apr 20 1.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
My relative receives NHS care from what is essentially a live in carer. In a situation like that it's certainly safer than being in a home. I'm not saying that it feasible for all people though of course, as it would take up generous resources. My gist is that with the best will in the world, covid-19 is very contagious and if a home has multiple carers coming in and out, it's a matter of if not when. Regular testing would help mitigate that to a degree, but it's still a concerning environment for people to be at this time.
We are trying to avoid any agency staff or sharing staff between sites. But at least there is a cleaning station when they come in, they change their cloths and when not exercising social distancing they wear PPE
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 20 Apr 20 2.02pm | |
---|---|
I was in shop today and couldn"t believe my eyes, the Daily mail had turned on the CONS, front page, i wondered had i gone all corona, started to sweat profusely, felt unsteady on my feet, looked again and it was true, they are probably covering there tracks for when the inquest comes in to the shambolic handling at the beginning of the crisis, i reached out, almost touching the paper( i did used to buy it up until a year ago on a saturday for the tv mag), anyway, i came to my senses, put the 70p back in my pocket, the way things are going over here i might need it!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 20 Apr 20 2.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That's complex as it's shift working and people have a variety of needs At a given time up to 3 residents per staff member but usually more. On the other hand some people need 1:1 help. For a small home with 30 residents with Dementia we have 20 Care Assistants, 6 Team Leaders and 3 Domestics. So overall a roughly 1:1 ratio to cover 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If that’s the total of staff and they do 8 hour shifts then wouldn’t it be 3 residents to 1 staff member? If there’s very few staff overnight then in between.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 20 Apr 20 2.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Most have income. The Old Age Pension for a start. But yes, private residents probably pay £1,200 so it isn't necessarily sustainable for many House sale money gone in however many years it takes when paying £50-60,000 a year. It is what it is and it’s unfair on the young to cover it when people just keep living longer and the middle agers don’t or won’t take their parents in either.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 20 Apr 20 2.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
You're no doubt far more knowledgeable in this area than I am, but I do have an elderly relative who suffers from dementia and she has live-in help. Considering the gravity of the current situation, I think that the government should've set out guidelines that basically lead to far fewer people going in and out of these buildings. Covid-19 is fast spreading through a very significant number of care homes to devastating effect, so contrary to their intended purpose, they have become unsafe environments for the elderly at this time. If I had an elderly relative in a care home right now, I'd strongly considering removing them. Live in help must be expensive. I’ve that company on tv advertising live in help. I think the carer talks to the old chap about his guitar playing. Elder might be the company name. The government were probably thinking about the outside world and hospitals. Care homes closed off to public visiting probably satisfied their concern on care homes. Workers working in different homes maybe escaped their attention. I don’t recall anyone raising it publicly before the outbreak either.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.