You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
September 19 2024 2.54am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 285 of 435 < 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 >

  

Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 13 Jul 23 4.22pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

don't get personal. Why did you think this was aimed at you ?

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 23 4.26pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I'm feeling the constant need to point out that the BBC is publicly funded. Its employees are meant to be public servants - it's meant to be a public service broadcast organisation. Therefore, it is, and should be, far more accountable to the public than some private entity. Stories about corruption and failures at the BBC are in the public interest. The public has some right to know how their money is being spent.
Seriously, do people expect nobody to care that a newsreader can afford 35k for dirty pics? Or that despite the complaint being made in May, nothing was done until the Sun published the allegations? Or that everyone was threatened to withhold the name by lawyers - even though, as stated, these are public servants supposedly working in the public interest?
There are a couple of people here whose judgement is being clouded by bias. Publicly funded organisations should be scrutinised. Private companies can deal internally with things how they like, within the law, of course - not public ones.
Also, there seems to be quite a liklehood of criminal behaviour - stuff that has been proven (proven fact Wisbech) to have been covered up (proven fact) before. No amount of hand wringing and BBC sycophancy makes up for this. If the BBC falls due to its own corruption and failures, so be it. There will maybe arise something better and more transparent. Less pay for people with little or no talent would be a starting point for many.

Edited by ASCPFC (13 Jul 2023 3.58pm)

Edited by ASCPFC (13 Jul 2023 3.58pm)

Wrong on just about every level but I have no time now to explain why. Suffice to say that BBC employees are not civil servants, indeed many providing content aren’t even employees. Many are on short term contracts with little job security. All though are as entitled to as much privacy as everyone else.

Whether there has been any criminal behaviour is not decided by either you or me, but by the police, and so far they have said there isn’t any. Innuendo is not evidence. Fact!

I can though agree that there are people here whose judgement is clouded by bias. Walk past a mirror and you might see one.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 23 4.29pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

don't get personal. Why did you think this was aimed at you ?

Wasn’t it? Most such comments here seem to be.

The sentiments are accurate whether it was or not.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Helmet46 Flag Croydon 13 Jul 23 4.44pm Send a Private Message to Helmet46 Add Helmet46 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Wasn’t it? Most such comments here seem to be.

The sentiments are accurate whether it was or not.

Why would most comments be aimed at you?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Jul 23 4.47pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Wrong on just about every level but I have no time now to explain why. Suffice to say that BBC employees are not civil servants, indeed many providing content aren’t even employees. Many are on short term contracts with little job security. All though are as entitled to as much privacy as everyone else.

Whether there has been any criminal behaviour is not decided by either you or me, but by the police, and so far they have said there isn’t any. Innuendo is not evidence. Fact!

I can though agree that there are people here whose judgement is clouded by bias. Walk past a mirror and you might see one.

It's entirely correct and you are entirely incorrect. You clearly know nothing at all about this. Your lack of actual engagement is like arguing with a bot. I can't be bothered with it. You are completely one eyed and bias. Have a proper look into it, and have some self reflection if you wish to talk about reflections. Something is clouding your judgement, I have no skin in this game. I don't know who you think you are to insult my intelligence with your utter rubbish. You must work for the BBC. Who funds them? Who are their pay and incomes linked to? Is there any point asking? Are you BBC's version of Chat GPT? Did you even notice the investigation into the paedophilia and cover ups? Certainly, you are the epitome of useful idiot.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 13 Jul 23 4.50pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Wrong on just about every level but I have no time now to explain why. Suffice to say that BBC employees are not civil servants, indeed many providing content aren’t even employees. Many are on short term contracts with little job security. All though are as entitled to as much privacy as everyone else.

Whether there has been any criminal behaviour is not decided by either you or me, but by the police, and so far they have said there isn’t any. Innuendo is not evidence. Fact!

I can though agree that there are people here whose judgement is clouded by bias. Walk past a mirror and you might see one.

Surely the point is that would any organisation want a person in a senior high profile position whose judgement is such that he indulges in the activities that he has. It doesn't really matter whether he has committed an actual crime on not, the damage he has done to the organisation's reputation is enough to warrent his dismissal.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Helmet46 Flag Croydon 13 Jul 23 4.51pm Send a Private Message to Helmet46 Add Helmet46 as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

It's entirely correct and you are entirely incorrect. You clearly know nothing at all about this. Your lack of actual engagement is like arguing with a bot. I can't be bothered with it. You are completely one eyed and bias. Have a proper look into it, and have some self reflection if you wish to talk about reflections. Something is clouding your judgement, I have no skin in this game. I don't know who you think you are to insult my intelligence with your utter rubbish. You must work for the BBC. Who funds them? Who are their pay and incomes linked to? Is there any point asking? Are you BBC's version of Chat GPT? Did you even notice the investigation into the paedophilia and cover ups? Certainly, you are the epitome of useful idiot.

Lol - he knows everything about everything. I’ve come to the conclusion that there is nothing he’s not an expert on. He’s a grown up version of that kid at school, you know the one!

Edited by Helmet46 (13 Jul 2023 5.02pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 13 Jul 23 4.56pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

Seems Mr Edwards didnt stop at young people, he also harranged his fellow employees . . . [Link]

“Don’t speak ill of the sick”……. Mapletree 2023

Edited by Spiderman (13 Jul 2023 4.57pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Jul 23 5.00pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Helmet46

Lol - he knows everything about everything. I’ve come to the conclusion that there is nothing he’s not an expert on. He’s a grown up version of that kid at school, you know the one!

I just thought there was perhaps some reasoning and debate possible. The Saville enquiries and the fact that the BBC is a public service organisation have obviously passed him by. I thought the whole reason people defend the BBC is it's public service status, but it must simply be that it's anti Trump and anti Brexit if these opinions are anything to go by. I thought I made decent points but was obviously completely wrong. Judge, jury and executioner appointed. I also saw Teddy Eagle was treated with the same contempt when pointing out simple facts with evidence so there's obviously a reason.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 13 Jul 23 5.03pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

“Don’t speak ill of the sick”……. Mapletree 2023

Edited by Spiderman (13 Jul 2023 4.57pm)

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 13 Jul 23 6.23pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

I concur, but you're wasting your breath. The BBC has all the failings of any large institution, but we are better with it than not with it. Radios 3, 4, 6 Music, BBC 4, the World Service and a mass of local radio would not exist if it were not this public service. The World Service, in particular, is the envy of the world and respected everywhere it is not jammed.

I would agree with you regarding the World Service's reputation....though, as with me, it's often something people talk about rather than listen to....Not so perhaps with the other stations as the political culture has also touched them.

It should be remembered that most of the world outside of the west is not accelerated neo and social liberalism....And that is very much what the BBC sells.

Originally posted by silvertop

Trouble is, the right of the Tory party hates it and fill the right wing press with negative stories about it which their readers consume like milky tea. Just look at some of the waffle peddled on here.

For instance, one poster up the thread attacked the BBC for not broadcasting the U21 Euros. He conveniently forgot that ITV, Sky, BT and Ch4 (until the final) were also not hosting it. He mentioned that they were, however, showing the women's Ashes based on some mythical woke agenda. Again, conflating issues since (as I think I have said at least 3 times on THIS thread) inclusivity etc. is a statutory requirement imposed on both the BBC and Ch 4 under the Equality Act through a derived regulation brought in by...the Tories!!

You're correct that....pretty much the majority of anyone calling themselves a conservative have both a mistrust and dislike of the BBC, the further right they are the greater the disquiet.

It should also be noted that a large proportion of conservatives would rip the Equality Act to shreds as it's little more than a conduit to destroy most of what they believe in. Mentioning that it's been the Tories who have both pushed and implemented all these policies isn't lost on conservatives.....We don't own our party, just like most grass roots Labour people don't own theirs....Both parties are globalist and donor owned and treat their base with contempt.....At most they throw them unwanted scraps like Roman emperors at a feast.

Originally posted by silvertop

And it's not just here. Remember the withdrawal of the free license for pensioners? This was indirectly imposed by the Tories through fund cutting. The BBC did not want to do it and softened the impact by ensuring those pensioners who were actually poor did not pay (remember, pensioners disposable incomes passed those of the waged many years ago). Yet this did not stop pension groups campaigning, not outside Parliament or the local Tory office, but outside the BBC. Hook, line, sinker.

I don't know much about that, but it sounds like a regrettable policy.

Originally posted by silvertop

Unlike most of the print press, and much of the broadcast media, the BBC does not recite the Tory message and [gulp] often criticizes them directly. The affrontery! Thatcher hated the fact that it constantly called her policies to account. Surely a function of the Fourth Estate? And again, the attack of bias is rubbish. After a brief honeymoon with Blair the knives were out. Byers, for instance, was practically hounded by them out the door; and let's not mention WMD...

On Thatcher you're going back approximately thirty years. The BBC still at that time was far more politically diverse than it is now....parts of it were small 'c', while you would get your geniune political opposition as you mention.

Those times are long behind us.

I can point to Brexit, Covid and the Ukraine war as three recent events where the BBC didn't only restrict and in some cases defacto ban alternative opinions but they actively supported governmental policy by becoming a mouthpiece.

They did not balance the genuine opposition opinions to all of these positions to anything like a reflective reality of what was going on.

As a last word on this aspect, Tim Davie himself has admitted that the BBC has a 'liberal bias', while some might say that's an understatement, others might also ask why is a publicly funded body been allowed to become politically slanted.

Originally posted by silvertop

That said, the issues on funding, falling numbers and relevance are very important issues and the B.B.C. does face these existential issues as it constantly debates on Radio 4. However, that people conned into believing this right wing anti BBC agenda then construct arguments based on any event to justify that stance says more about them than it does about the BBC.

I'm afraid the future of the BBC has been decided, it's mostly unspoken knowledge to many. It's losing fee payers, it lost the right a long time ago and...well, the far left hate everything other than the far left. It only really exists for old people and liberals.

I shouldn't over emphasize the political I suppose even though it's tempting but essentially the Internet and how the young consume that dreaded word, 'content' is killing it anyway. Once the boomers are gone so shall it be.

Mistakes were made years ago that now would require major surgery to fix and it just wouldn't happen. The left and practical realities of technology have killed the BBC and like the Titanic, it's just a matter of time and frantic hand waving before it eventually slips below the waves.....at least in anything like the structure it is now.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Jul 2023 6.28pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 13 Jul 23 6.32pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I'm afraid the future of the BBC has been decided, it's mostly unspoken knowledge to many. It's losing fee payers, it lost the right a long time ago and...well, the far left hate everything other than the far left. It only really exists for old people and liberals.

I shouldn't over emphasize the political I suppose even though it's tempting but essentially the Internet and how the young consume that dreaded word, 'content' is killing it anyway. Once the boomers are gone so shall it be.

Mistakes were made years ago that now would require major surgery to fix and it just wouldn't happen. The left and practical realities of technology have killed the BBC and like the Titanic, it's just a matter of time and frantic hand waving before it eventually slips below the waves.....at least in anything like the structure it is now.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Jul 2023 6.28pm)

An extremely good reposte Stirls, however, your nemisis that is Wissie is blowing fire n brimstone through his nostrils & his finger are feverishly bashing out a tirade directed towards you.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 285 of 435 < 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)