You are the king of pin dancing so I'll take no lessons in admitting errors from the likes of you.

I'll repeat what you so obviously choose to ignore.

My point, once again, was that the reason for the demographic reality of 90+ genetic Europeans in the US in 65 was expressly down to its laws prior to then.

Your point about 'whites' and Europeans is moot, as that is what it meant and what its immigration policy did....if there were exceptions around the edges I don't know.

I made an error stating that this was in the constitution when in fact it was immigration law.....big deal.

Your fixation upon this is pure pedantry as it made zero difference to the outcome of any case.

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Dec 2020 12.18pm)

You are doing what you always do when you are caught with your trousers down. You try to divert the attention onto something else and then tediously build a castle on new sand, attacking your critics and generally hiding from the truth. Now, who does that remind you of?

We aren't talking about your earlier point. We are talking solely about making the incorrect attribution of your claim as being in the constitution when it isn't.

That was a big claim. It's factually wrong. Facts matter. Trying to pretend they don't (pedantry) demonstrates you don't care about facts. Your opinion is all that matters. Once again, who does that remind you of?

There is a pattern here. Only a few days ago the claim was made, and repeated, that Fox News was now owned by Disney and that was the reason it had changed it's tune on Trump. That too is wrong, but it took a while before that fact was admitted.

No. It refers only to the subject here.

You can try to join in the deflection if it makes you feel better and puts you in the "good boy" corner of "Stirlingworld", which has an odour not dissimilar to "Trumpworld" in the USA.

I was trying to get a load of Trump Christmas cards but Brexit is managing to cause a problem with imports. I'm not sure if that's ironic or if the joke's on me.

You are doing what you always do when you are caught with your trousers down. You try to divert the attention onto something else and then tediously build a castle on new sand, attacking your critics and generally hiding from the truth. Now, who does that remind you of?

We aren't talking about your earlier point. We are talking solely about making the incorrect attribution of your claim as being in the constitution when it isn't.

That was a big claim. It's factually wrong. Facts matter. Trying to pretend they don't (pedantry) demonstrates you don't care about facts. Your opinion is all that matters. Once again, who does that remind you of?

There is a pattern here. Only a few days ago the claim was made, and repeated, that Fox News was now owned by Disney and that was the reason it had changed it's tune on Trump. That too is wrong, but it took a while before that fact was admitted.