This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 29 Jul 15 9.01pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 29 Jul 15 9.04pm | |
---|---|
Quote fed up eagle at 29 Jul 2015 9.01pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 29 Jul 15 9.10pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 8.44pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts. If that is the case, why do they advocate unlimited immigration that takes existing workers' jobs or lowers their wages and makes housing more difficult?
In this case, connecting worker's conditions with migration is actually very tenuous. I could write a really long post on this but instead here's a link to a great piece of literature that came through my door during the election: [Link] Note the fact that between 2005-08 when migration was flowing higher than it is now, employment of existing British workers rose by over 100 000. It's a pretty damning counter to the whole 'comin ova e're, taking OUR jobs' stuff. I'm sure you could write a very long post telling us how wonderful mass immigration is for us all. As it is such an unmitigated blessing, presumably you think we should encourage even more of it to accrue even more benefit. Of course an increase in employment of 100,000 over three years must clearly be a direct result of mass immigration! Edited by leggedstruggle (29 Jul 2015 9.10pm)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Jul 15 9.10pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 9.04pm
Quote fed up eagle at 29 Jul 2015 9.01pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts.
The old Labour party were anti EU.....Corbyn pretty much toes the pro EU line...Also Corbyn's a CND wimp. The working classes were never CND majority supporters.....That's your nut jobs, middle class hippies and drop outs.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 29 Jul 15 9.14pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 29 Jul 2015 9.10pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 9.04pm
Quote fed up eagle at 29 Jul 2015 9.01pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts.
The old Labour party were anti EU.....Corbyn pretty much toes the pro EU line...Also Corbyn's a CND wimp. The working classes were never CND majority supporters.....That's your nut jobs, middle class hippies and drop outs.
CND was largely a branch of the Communist Party of Britain.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 29 Jul 15 9.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.25pm
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 29 Jul 2015 7.08pm
Quote serial thriller at 26 Jul 2015 11.43am
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 26 Jul 2015 10.21am
Serial Thriller - so what are you suggesting is done then about the migrants in Calais then?
I have a question for those on the right who have no sympathy with these poor folk: how bad would things have to get in Britain for you to leave? Would you leave if war broke out? If bombings were frequent? Jeremy Corbyn became PM? Sorry - just had to bump this - still makes me laugh at how out of touch most of the lefties are on here..
Unfortunately it wouldn’t end up being 4000 though would it? Basically what you are suggesting is that anyone who can get themselves to Calais would be entitled to be housed by Britain, so it’s not really 4000 is it? it would end up being millions.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 29 Jul 15 9.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.25pm
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 29 Jul 2015 7.08pm
Quote serial thriller at 26 Jul 2015 11.43am
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 26 Jul 2015 10.21am
Serial Thriller - so what are you suggesting is done then about the migrants in Calais then?
I have a question for those on the right who have no sympathy with these poor folk: how bad would things have to get in Britain for you to leave? Would you leave if war broke out? If bombings were frequent? Jeremy Corbyn became PM? Sorry - just had to bump this - still makes me laugh at how out of touch most of the lefties are on here..
Unfortunately it wouldn’t end up being 4000 though would it? Basically what you are suggesting is that anyone who can get themselves to Calais would be entitled to be housed by Britain, so it’s not really 4000 is it? it would end up being millions.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 29 Jul 15 9.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 9.10pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 8.44pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts. If that is the case, why do they advocate unlimited immigration that takes existing workers' jobs or lowers their wages and makes housing more difficult?
In this case, connecting worker's conditions with migration is actually very tenuous. I could write a really long post on this but instead here's a link to a great piece of literature that came through my door during the election: [Link] Note the fact that between 2005-08 when migration was flowing higher than it is now, employment of existing British workers rose by over 100 000. It's a pretty damning counter to the whole 'comin ova e're, taking OUR jobs' stuff. I'm sure you could write a very long post telling us how wonderful mass immigration is for us all. As it is such an unmitigated blessing, presumably you think we should encourage even more of it to accrue even more benefit. Of course an increase in employment of 100,000 over three years must clearly be a direct result of mass immigration! Edited by leggedstruggle (29 Jul 2015 9.10pm)
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jul 15 9.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 9.23pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 9.10pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 8.44pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts. If that is the case, why do they advocate unlimited immigration that takes existing workers' jobs or lowers their wages and makes housing more difficult?
In this case, connecting worker's conditions with migration is actually very tenuous. I could write a really long post on this but instead here's a link to a great piece of literature that came through my door during the election: [Link] Note the fact that between 2005-08 when migration was flowing higher than it is now, employment of existing British workers rose by over 100 000. It's a pretty damning counter to the whole 'comin ova e're, taking OUR jobs' stuff. I'm sure you could write a very long post telling us how wonderful mass immigration is for us all. As it is such an unmitigated blessing, presumably you think we should encourage even more of it to accrue even more benefit. Of course an increase in employment of 100,000 over three years must clearly be a direct result of mass immigration! Edited by leggedstruggle (29 Jul 2015 9.10pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 29 Jul 15 9.32pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 9.04pm
Quote fed up eagle at 29 Jul 2015 9.01pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 29 Jul 15 9.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 29 Jul 2015 9.18pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.25pm
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 29 Jul 2015 7.08pm
Quote serial thriller at 26 Jul 2015 11.43am
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 26 Jul 2015 10.21am
Serial Thriller - so what are you suggesting is done then about the migrants in Calais then?
I have a question for those on the right who have no sympathy with these poor folk: how bad would things have to get in Britain for you to leave? Would you leave if war broke out? If bombings were frequent? Jeremy Corbyn became PM? Sorry - just had to bump this - still makes me laugh at how out of touch most of the lefties are on here..
Unfortunately it wouldn’t end up being 4000 though would it? Basically what you are suggesting is that anyone who can get themselves to Calais would be entitled to be housed by Britain, so it’s not really 4000 is it? it would end up being millions.
In a Capitalist society, people migrate to where the money is. That's why more people want to come here than, say, Sudan. I believe that if you tackle global economic inequality, the issue of migration will become far easier to deal with. We are entering what has been claimed will be the most unequal century in human history, where wealth is more concentrated than ever. In addition to this, we have an alarming rise in the scarcity of resources (oil, water, food) and a rapidly changing climate which are putting further strain on those in the third world and contributing to migration. For example, people are leaving Bangladesh because it has experienced some of the worst floodings in its history, while our motive for meddling in the middle east and Africa, thus causing people to flee their homes, continues to be based around oil and key mining zones. Therefore of course I think our current situation with migration is unsustainable, because we refuse to deal with the issues that cause it. I also find the idea of leaving those in Calais to die as Winter arrives, particularly considering the higher proportion who are women and children, absolutely heartbreaking on a human level, because god knows what most of them have been through.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 29 Jul 15 9.40pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2015 9.30pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 9.23pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 9.10pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 8.44pm
Quote serial thriller at 29 Jul 2015 8.24pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 29 Jul 2015 7.39pm
What is the Labour Party for and who do they represent?
Obviously Blair decided that the biggest democratic movement in the country wasn't his cup of tea, scrapped clause 4 and instead decided taking cash for people who wanted government contracts/plushy positions in the Lords, but then he was a demon child spawned to bring pain and misery to mankind, so we can overlook him. That Corbyn's drawn support from most of the major unions and is now bookie's favourite shows the importance of ordinary workers to the Labour party even after St Tony's best efforts. If that is the case, why do they advocate unlimited immigration that takes existing workers' jobs or lowers their wages and makes housing more difficult?
In this case, connecting worker's conditions with migration is actually very tenuous. I could write a really long post on this but instead here's a link to a great piece of literature that came through my door during the election: [Link] Note the fact that between 2005-08 when migration was flowing higher than it is now, employment of existing British workers rose by over 100 000. It's a pretty damning counter to the whole 'comin ova e're, taking OUR jobs' stuff. I'm sure you could write a very long post telling us how wonderful mass immigration is for us all. As it is such an unmitigated blessing, presumably you think we should encourage even more of it to accrue even more benefit. Of course an increase in employment of 100,000 over three years must clearly be a direct result of mass immigration! Edited by leggedstruggle (29 Jul 2015 9.10pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.