You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy
September 21 2024 12.51am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 277 of 289 < 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 >

  

The groover Flag Danbury 08 Jun 24 8.18am Send a Private Message to The groover Add The groover as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

I know they don't but everyone else does. It's a lot of money for those who might have already had it twice and not found it too bad.

I was vaccinated in Oct 23. I've had the latest covid about 5 weeks ago. Awful! I was in bed for 3 days. My wife was worse, also vaccinated. In bed for 5 days.

People seem to forget that the vaccine only lasts for 3/4 months (6 months with a booster). As do the antibodies after you have it. The immunity also tapers off.

And before someone gives it the BBS BS about anecdotal evidence. I worked for a company that made one of the home test kits, and also the antibody tests.

We were all given the chance to volunteer. So I did.

We had to test every morning before going to work. If we caught covid or after we had the vaccine we provided a blood sample once a week.

This was how it was proved that people could have no symptoms and that the antibodies only lasted 3/4 months.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eaglesdare Flag 08 Jun 24 9.10am Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

So strange that people are catching covid even after being vaccinated or had the booster.

We were all told "get the vaccine and you won't catch covid"

I guess if the penny hasn't dropped yet after your 10th-15th booster I don't think it ever will.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Jun 24 11.26am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by The groover

I worked in Hospitals all over the South East throughout covid. I was fortunate in that I was given FFP2 masks and I wore goggles as well. Yes I looked a t*** on the underground, but given the number of selfish f***wits not wearing masks it was a good call.

I didn't get a cold or flu for 3 years.

I got covid but only when I couldn't wear a mask. At the dentist. The assistant had it!

The statement that "masks don't work" is incorrect. The correct masks do work.

FFP3 being the best. I had access to those when I had a high risk shout to deal with, I also had full body suits and gloves as well. FFP 3's were a git to breath in. Those working with covid patients full time had my utmost admiration.

By high risk shout I mean working in an area containing covid patients. I didn't get it due to the precautions we took.

I have had to suit up and mask up a number of times during my career. Not just for covid. There are a number of airborne/liquid transmittable ailments that need to be avoided.

If you had to work on a device that had blood contamination, would you say Nuh, don't need gloves or a mask!

The only masks that properly work are standard passed gas masks....and that's completely unrealistic for most.

So to complain about other people is unfair.

Even FFP3 requires training to work (ie not touching it or the face) and requires regular replacing. So it isn't guaranteed and I don't believe that's ever been suggested.

It's completely unrealistic as a solution for millions of people due to availability and cost....So no, masks don't work as an effective solution unless they are gas masks.

There is no panacea for an airborne virus and to suggest that it was the public at fault is being unrealistic and unfair.

Perhaps your immune system is below average and your paranoia is justified to some degree. However, that does not mean other people should be expected to operate for the lowest common denominators.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jun 2024 11.27am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 24 12.58pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

I have long thought this persistent blanket dismissal of face masks as an effective protection against Covid to be unwise, as it seems counterintuitive.

Whilst it’s obviously true that simple masks cannot filter out every airborne virus and that other measures, like hand washing and not touching your face are also important, it seems obvious that any kind of barrier will lower both infection and transmission.

If the level of viral load is reduced then the ability of our immune system to cope must be enhanced. It won’t stop every viral particle but stop enough to make a difference.

It’s no different to wearing a seat belt. You can still get killed wearing one, but wearing one improves your chances.

Various studies seem to support this:-

[Link]

[Link]

There are many more.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Jun 24 1.13pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

This is an absurd comparison.

Viruses are many times smaller than most face masks.

The only masks that can do it are surgical masks (which come with the said problems) being impractical or standard passed gas masks. Again, availability and cost made these impractical as a national resource.

To suggest that wearing cloth masks protected people in any way actually put them more danger of infection by encouraging them to feel protected....this lowered their guard and meant closer contact with people.

This simple truth does not change my opinion that the idea that we could ever stop an airborne virus from transmission was only ever an incredibly high level of hubris and completely unrealistic.

It's borne of the standard level of incompetence and lack of willingness for people to accept the harsh realities of life.....which leads to worst outcomes not better.

About four hundred billion worst.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jun 2024 1.18pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 24 2.31pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

No one is suggesting that simple masks stop transmission. That wasn’t ever the point of them being recommended.

What is not just being suggested, but is supported by evidence from studies, is that they reduce the level of viral load sufficiently to make a worthwhile difference. When you are trying to manage a pandemic and ensure that your health services don’t collapse that’s not just important. It’s vital.

Emphasising the other requirements, of maintaining distance, washing hands and not touching your face, especially your eyes, nose and mouth remains part of an overall strategy. Remember, “Hands, face, space”?

What’s also vital, when we all face a crisis, is that we all follow the prevention strategies and that no one ignores them because of their own reasoning or personal prejudices. Medical exemptions being different considerations. It’s not for individuals to determine national strategies or impose their definitions of what they consider the harsh realities of life on others. Especially when the actual evidence shows these to be wrong.

Regrettable though it may be issuing obligatory rules in such a crisis then becomes necessary, despite the objections. So even with hindsight it looks as though the advice of the WHO and our own public health experts was spot on.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eaglesdare Flag 09 Jun 24 2.00pm Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

[Link]

- Celebrity doctors promoted Covid vaccine without declaring payments

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jun 24 2.26pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I would like to see where and when the government announced that 'that simple masks' didn't stop transmission.

From my memory the decision was obviously made not to say that in public announcements and to make the entry of people into normal life mask required, 'simple' or not. As stated they wanted surgical resources for front line staff as they should.

There is no evidence that cloth masks made any difference to transmission and the statistics from when masks were required show no slowing down of transmission at all.

While front line staff would have had marginally better masks, the reality of dealing with infectious and/or sick people meant viral load would have ensured they caught it anyway.

The 'mask up' message to the public was a tool of social coercion and nothing else. It was the state lying to its people. Any attempt to spin it otherwise is a continuation of those lies.

Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jun 2024 2.32pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The groover Flag Danbury 09 Jun 24 8.17pm Send a Private Message to The groover Add The groover as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

This is an absurd comparison.

Viruses are many times smaller than most face masks.

The only masks that can do it are surgical masks (which come with the said problems) being impractical or standard passed gas masks. Again, availability and cost made these impractical as a national resource.

To suggest that wearing cloth masks protected people in any way actually put them more danger of infection by encouraging them to feel protected....this lowered their guard and meant closer contact with people.

This simple truth does not change my opinion that the idea that we could ever stop an airborne virus from transmission was only ever an incredibly high level of hubris and completely unrealistic.

It's borne of the standard level of incompetence and lack of willingness for people to accept the harsh realities of life.....which leads to worst outcomes not better.

About four hundred billion worst.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jun 2024 1.18pm)

Surgical masks partially protect the patient from those performing an operation, not the other way round.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The groover Flag Danbury 09 Jun 24 8.24pm Send a Private Message to The groover Add The groover as a friend

Originally posted by eaglesdare

So strange that people are catching covid even after being vaccinated or had the booster.

We were all told "get the vaccine and you won't catch covid"

I guess if the penny hasn't dropped yet after your 10th-15th booster I don't think it ever will.

Vaccines against Flu/Covid offer a reduction in symptoms/recovery time. They protect against the strains present in the vaccine.

As an example, the flu vaccine will contain all known strains at the time of production. Typically from the Australian winter. It will not stop you from getting a new strain or becoming ill from that. If its closely related to a strain that is in the vaccine it will help reduce symptoms and recovery time.

This type of virus will constantly mutate to aid its transmission.

Are you suggesting that we should not bother with the flu vaccine?

There seems to be a great deal of Karen on facebook says in this thread.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jun 24 8.56pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by The groover

Surgical masks partially protect the patient from those performing an operation, not the other way round.

Minimal.

Disinfectant wound preparation and sterilized instruments are the main protection.

Regardless, masks made no discernable difference to transmission.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eaglesdare Flag 09 Jun 24 9.44pm Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

Originally posted by The groover

Vaccines against Flu/Covid offer a reduction in symptoms/recovery time. They protect against the strains present in the vaccine.

As an example, the flu vaccine will contain all known strains at the time of production. Typically from the Australian winter. It will not stop you from getting a new strain or becoming ill from that. If its closely related to a strain that is in the vaccine it will help reduce symptoms and recovery time.

This type of virus will constantly mutate to aid its transmission.

Are you suggesting that we should not bother with the flu vaccine?

There seems to be a great deal of Karen on facebook says in this thread.

My point was we were all told "get the vaccine and you won't catch covid" we were also told that it's "safe and effective". Many people were coerced into getting it for many reasons such as loosing their job, not being able to travel or to see loved ones.

In regards to the flu vaccine you mentioned. My stance is the same as the covid vaccine. Get it if you want or if you feel the need to get it. Don't force others to get it if they don't want to. I would never tell someone to get it or not to get it.

I have family members who get the flu vaccine but have not had the covid one. And vice versa.

I for one have never had it nor needed it.

Edited by eaglesdare (09 Jun 2024 9.45pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 277 of 289 < 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy