BBC (again)

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 275 of 435 < 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 >

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 12 Jul 23 10.29am
This is getting better & better, far more 'watchable' than anything the bbc could ever produce. The Telegraph have reported that 4 youngsters have complained about the 'he who shall not be named' bbc presenter . . . [Link] This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 12 Jul 23 10.29am

This is getting better & better, far more 'watchable' than anything the bbc could ever produce. The Telegraph have reported that 4 youngsters have complained about the 'he who shall not be named' bbc presenter . . . [Link]

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 12 Jul 23 11.05am
Originally posted by eagleman13 The Telegraph have reported that 4 youngsters have complained about the 'he who shall not be named' bbc presenter . . . How do these youngsters know who to complain about?
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

12 Jul 23 11.05am

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by eagleman13

The Telegraph have reported that 4 youngsters have complained about the 'he who shall not be named' bbc presenter . . .

How do these youngsters know who to complain about?

Alert a moderator to this post

Helmet46 Croydon 12 Jul 23 11.09am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle How do these youngsters know who to complain about? Twitter or Reddit??
Alert a moderator to this post

Helmet46

Croydon 12 Jul 23 11.09am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

How do these youngsters know who to complain about?

Twitter or Reddit??

Alert a moderator to this post

YT Oxford 12 Jul 23 11.10am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle How do these youngsters know who to complain about? Surely they complain about whoever they believe has wronged them. Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
Alert a moderator to this post

Oxford 12 Jul 23 11.10am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

How do these youngsters know who to complain about?

Surely they complain about whoever they believe has wronged them.

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 12 Jul 23 11.57am
I have to admit to getting bored with the inevitability of the way it is coming out. HE, who cannot be named. Trial by media ? who'd have thought it ? It's coming back to bite someone on the ass. (for anyone who's seen the photo) I disengage, I turn the page.
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 12 Jul 23 11.57am

Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly

I have to admit to getting bored with the inevitability of the way it is coming out.
HE, who cannot be named.

Trial by media ? who'd have thought it ? It's coming back to bite someone on the ass. (for anyone who's seen the photo)

I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 Jul 23 12.17pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle No. Are you? Clearly not - but your answers cannot be taken seriously after this. You're like a lackey for the state. In fact, take away the like. You want to give money to people to carry on paedophilia, cover it up, and then do it all over again. The general movement now will be defund the BBC regardless - so you will become the dissenter. Best of luck with it. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 Jul 23 12.17pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No. Are you?

Clearly not - but your answers cannot be taken seriously after this. You're like a lackey for the state. In fact, take away the like. You want to give money to people to carry on paedophilia, cover it up, and then do it all over again. The general movement now will be defund the BBC regardless - so you will become the dissenter. Best of luck with it.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

eaglesdare 12 Jul 23 12.58pm
Poeple pay for sexual images on websites like only fans all the time. whats the difference here?
Alert a moderator to this post

eaglesdare

12 Jul 23 12.58pm

Poeple pay for sexual images on websites like only fans all the time. whats the difference here?

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 12 Jul 23 1.30pm
Originally posted by eaglesdare Poeple pay for sexual images on websites like only fans all the time. whats the difference here? something to do with the first accusers age at the time (17) and it being illegal with under-18's. Also the 'victim' clearly stated in one of their chats that he was still at school. And got paid for photos Needs to be investigated. I disengage, I turn the page.
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 12 Jul 23 1.30pm

Originally posted by eaglesdare

Poeple pay for sexual images on websites like only fans all the time. whats the difference here?

something to do with the first accusers age at the time (17) and it being illegal with under-18's. Also the 'victim' clearly stated in one of their chats that he was still at school. And got paid for photos

Needs to be investigated.

I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Jul 23 1.37pm
Originally posted by ASCPFC Clearly not - but your answers cannot be taken seriously after this. You're like a lackey for the state. In fact, take away the like. You want to give money to people to carry on paedophilia, cover it up, and then do it all over again. The general movement now will be defund the BBC regardless - so you will become the dissenter. Best of luck with it. The BBC has no more wish to condone or cover up paedophilia than anyone else and to suggest otherwise is an affront to common sense. They simply need to do things lawfully and not act on unsubstantiated allegations. They, quite rightly, have paused their own investigations whilst the police carry out theirs. There is a right way to handle such matters, and that requires due process to be followed. If condemnation is due then it will be heard loud and clear, but at the appropriate time. How the BBC is funded is a completely separate issue, or certainly ought to be. I think it would be an enormous mistake to change the basis and force the BBC to become commercially based. It would destroy its ability to remain impartial and open the door not only to political influence but that of commercial interests and advertisers. There is already far too much of that in the media and we need the BBC to remain free of it. I don't detect any general clamour to defund the BBC. I see some in the right-wing press and from the right of the Tory party, both of whom think they would benefit from emasculating the BBC. Thankfully I don't think there is any chance of it happening. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 12 Jul 23 1.37pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The BBC has no more wish to condone or cover up paedophilia than anyone else and to suggest otherwise is an affront to common sense. They simply need to do things lawfully and not act on unsubstantiated allegations. They, quite rightly, have paused their own investigations whilst the police carry out theirs. There is a right way to handle such matters, and that requires due process to be followed. If condemnation is due then it will be heard loud and clear, but at the appropriate time.

How the BBC is funded is a completely separate issue, or certainly ought to be. I think it would be an enormous mistake to change the basis and force the BBC to become commercially based. It would destroy its ability to remain impartial and open the door not only to political influence but that of commercial interests and advertisers. There is already far too much of that in the media and we need the BBC to remain free of it.

I don't detect any general clamour to defund the BBC. I see some in the right-wing press and from the right of the Tory party, both of whom think they would benefit from emasculating the BBC. Thankfully I don't think there is any chance of it happening.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

PalazioVecchio south pole 12 Jul 23 1.45pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle The BBC has no more wish to condone or cover up paedophilia than anyone else and to suggest otherwise is an affront to common sense. They simply need to do things lawfully and not act on unsubstantiated allegations. They, quite rightly, have paused their own investigations whilst the police carry out theirs. There is a right way to handle such matters, and that requires due process to be followed. If condemnation is due then it will be heard loud and clear, but at the appropriate time. How the BBC is funded is a completely separate issue, or certainly ought to be. I think it would be an enormous mistake to change the basis and force the BBC to become commercially based. It would destroy its ability to remain impartial and open the door not only to political influence but that of commercial interests and advertisers. There is already far too much of that in the media and we need the BBC to remain free of it. I don't detect any general clamour to defund the BBC. I see some in the right-wing press and from the right of the Tory party, both of whom think they would benefit from emasculating the BBC. Thankfully I don't think there is any chance of it happening. Jimmy Savile Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford
Alert a moderator to this post

PalazioVecchio