This debate is awful, echoey chamber full of w***ers shouting over each other & scoring piss poor points.

The SNP bloke needs flaying he is utterly despicable.

Seriously think I'm going to spoil my ballot

Edited by Ouzo Dan (31 May 2017 8.47pm)

The mountains are calling & I must go.

Wasn't the programme opened with a clear statement of how "a well known polling agency" had carefully selected the audience to be as balanced as possible?

I agree with you that May was wise to stay away - Amber Rudd is being monstered but it's not her who's the figurehead of the Tory campaign.

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Whereas the audience come across as just thick thugs.

Most of the audience haven't spoken at all, so how do you come to that conclusion?

Perhaps; it's just as likely that most of the audience is liking what he says.

Given the way the BBC has sniped away at Labour during the campaign (just read Laura Kuessenberg's comments every day for evidence), I doubt the Beeb would have gone out of its way to rig things in Jezza's favour.

Not that 100 people in a hall in Cambridge will have much bearing on a general election.

Edited by Mr_Gristle (31 May 2017 8.55pm)

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

"well known polling agencies" also predicted, each and every one of them, a Hilary landslide. These debates have previous form in selection bias, specifically the BBC debate last GE. It is painfully, painfully evident in this case.