This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
legaleagle 28 Apr 15 9.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 7.04pm
Labour were hoping that the endless stream of immigrants would mean that they would win the election for ever more. Unfortunately they have been so useless that the only people who still vote for them are people that have just learned to tie their shoe laces or are ex miners. Edited by TheJudge (28 Apr 2015 7.06pm) In your haste to have a rather pathetic dig at Labour and any of the millions (plainly all far less intelligent than you) who vote for them, and to refer again to your pet topic of immigrants (when not posting about your new other pet topic of race), you overlook that EU nationals (other than Irish citizens) do not have the vote in parliamentary elections here.But don't let that stand in the way of blind prejudice and/or perhaps being unable to even thread the veritable shoelaces into the shoe in the first place.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Johnny Eagles berlin 28 Apr 15 9.38pm | |
---|---|
Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now. But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 28 Apr 15 10.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm
Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now. But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 28 Apr 15 10.13pm | |
---|---|
. Edited by legaleagle (28 Apr 2015 10.13pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 28 Apr 15 10.13pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm
Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now. But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.
Don't disagree re a credible "party of the left" and at least you don't appear to fall into a knee jerk equation of Labour automatically being of the "left" as opposed to left-inclined centrism nowadays. Not sure Farage has been very effective during this campaign...I think he's underperformed to date...very subdued... UKIP have an excellent record in the last European elections and three recent by elections for parliamentary seats,I agree.But at present they appear on course for a maximum of two seats. The Greens (who have been hamstring by abject performances by their leader)aren't that different to UKIP in terms of projected number of seats/% in polls.I find them no less credible than UKIP as a serious political party and political force for the future though I accept "credible" will depend on political viewpoint to some degree. Obviously, some of the Greens' policy statements have been less than thought through but then again in terms of credibility,if you take UKIP's main message away (EU/immigration),not sure the rest of the policies are any more credible overall than The Greens' if you take away their "main message" re climate change etc. Some of UKIP's recent flip flops re immigration policies have arguably been shambolic... The interesting thing is how "old" the age profile of UKIP voters is in the polls so perhaps diminishing over time as opposed to the Greens' age profile which is young and so may well increase as more young voters come on board.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 28 Apr 15 10.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Apr 2015 10.00pm
Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm
Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now. But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.
Does that not say an immense amount about just how bad the sham electoral system is in this country? That a party polling on 15% stands to receive 0-2 seats, yet the percentage of the national vote the SNP will get (rough back of envelope: 50% of 5 million = 2.5 million = 4% of national vote) and they are projected 57 seats. Is this not ringing alarm bells? Our electoral system is not fit for purpose. FWIW, I voted for AV in the referendum, despite hating the Lib Dems, as this was at least a move away from FPTP.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheJudge 28 Apr 15 11.20pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 28 Apr 2015 9.00pm
Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 7.04pm
Labour were hoping that the endless stream of immigrants would mean that they would win the election for ever more. Unfortunately they have been so useless that the only people who still vote for them are people that have just learned to tie their shoe laces or are ex miners. Edited by TheJudge (28 Apr 2015 7.06pm) In your haste to have a rather pathetic dig at Labour and any of the millions (plainly all far less intelligent than you) who vote for them, and to refer again to your pet topic of immigrants (when not posting about your new other pet topic of race), you overlook that EU nationals (other than Irish citizens) do not have the vote in parliamentary elections here.But don't let that stand in the way of blind prejudice and/or perhaps being unable to even thread the veritable shoelaces into the shoe in the first place.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 29 Apr 15 12.02am | |
---|---|
As I understand it,you have a major major problem about the number of immigrants coming to the UK.You have now gone on to suggest the "endless stream" of immigrants will vote Labour in the election and appear to suggest some sort of conspiracy ensuing from this by Labour to have encouraged the "endless stream" for this reason. A large part in numbers are from EU countries.Such people can't vote in parliamentary elections here.Non commonwealth national immigrants from outside the EU can't vote here in parliamentary elections either. According to a House of Commons briefing report on migration in 2014, c.two thirds of immigrants come from EU or non Commonwealth countries,so can't vote in parliamentary elections. The prejudices I was referring to?Just the rather silly ones expressed in your post I was responding to.
Edited by legaleagle (29 Apr 2015 12.20am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 29 Apr 15 12.14am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 29 Apr 2015 12.02am
As I understand it,you have a major problem about the number of immigrants coming to the UK.A large part in numbers are from EU countries.I had understood you from posts in the past to take the view that ceasing EU free movement was a key step in your oft expressed desire to stem overall immigration into the UK. Of course,non commonwealth national immigrants from outside the EU can't vote here in parliamentary elections either. According to a House of Commons briefing report on migration in 2014, c.two thirds of immigrants come from EU or non Commonwealth countries,so can't vote in parliamentary elections. The prejudices I was referring to?Just your inane ones expressed in your post I was responding to. Hope you are getting on well with the shoe laces ...so you're saying 1/3 can? That's around the population of Basingstoke every year. Given that the vast number would be un/low-skilled, it's not rocketscience to see how they (and other immigrants granted citizenship) would be voting. Whilst I can't provide the figures to assert the following, it's my instinct (I may be wrong) that emigrants are generally skilled/higher educated (or retired) than immigrants: therefore the political swing from overall net migration is pushed even further left. Perhaps the left are more comfortable with velcro?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Seth On a pale blue dot 29 Apr 15 12.33am | |
---|---|
Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 5.46pm
Quote Seth at 28 Apr 2015 5.30pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Apr 2015 4.56pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Apr 2015 4.19pm
Its almost as if it sells newspapers and content, to print only the 'inflamtory' side of stories. I mean you hear a lot about crazy Muslims, but you don't actually ever seem to see or met them. I'll bet Lee Rigby's family wished he hadn't seen or met crazy Muslims Jamie.
You are not allowed to remember that, or 9/11 or 7/7 it's not PC.
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 29 Apr 15 12.35am | |
---|---|
Quote davenotamonkey at 29 Apr 2015 12.14am
Quote legaleagle at 29 Apr 2015 12.02am
Whilst I can't provide the figures to assert the following, it's my instinct (I may be wrong) that emigrants are generally skilled/higher educated (or retired) than immigrants: therefore the political swing from overall net migration is pushed even further left. Perhaps the left are more comfortable with velcro? My first point was that unlike the impression the Judge's original post gave (which I was correcting) ,the majority of recent immigrants can't even vote in the coming election. You cannot necessarily make the assumptions you do.Those recent migrants that can vote will only be those migrants from Commonwealth countries and Ireland. This will include students and the many highly skilled people who come to work in an international centre like London. We have the equivalent of a points-based system in operation for most non EU immigration so it cannot be assumed the average Commonwealth national migrant coming here now would necessarily be low skilled/educated.Commonwealth migrants also include citizens of Australia,New Zealand, Canada and South Africa. According to ukimmigration.com,the "points-based" categories (ie you have to score enough points to get the visa)are: "Tier 1 Visas: For highly skilled migrants, entrepreneurs, investors, and graduate students. This has replaced the previous Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP), the Entrepreneur and Investor schemes, and the International Graduates Scheme.
For myself,I think the right of commonwealth and Irish nationals to vote is an anomaly,a hangover from long gone days of Empire,long due for abolition (In Australia,for example,they changed the rules,which had been similar, so British nationals arriving after 1984 can't vote in federal elections)and I would limit the vote in parliamentary elections to UK nationals,but that's off topic. Edited by legaleagle (29 Apr 2015 12.53am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 29 Apr 15 2.04am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Apr 2015 7.43pm
Matthew - what is actually wrong with saying 'n1gger' if it is in context? I saw '12 Years a Slave' recently and the term was used many, many times and it seemed appropriate given the subject matter. You personally seem to have an issue with it being used at all no matter what. We've had this conversation before but you never actually clarified your 100% anti-stance. Were the director of the film and the screenplay writers and the actors wrong to use the word in your opinion and if so 'why'? Simple question - would you use the 'n' word? You use 'bender'. Therefore one would assume that you would use other offensive words. With regards to the cinematic usage of slurs, I am not for censorship. However, there does need to be a line drawn. Did you see Django Unchained? To me, Tarantino overused racial slurs in the film for reasons of his own knowing. Racial slurs were to me, used too frequently to be of any relevance to the story and were there to shock and create controversy to hype the film. There is therefore a glance between historical accuracy and overuse to be found.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.