You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > CONservative government incompetence.
November 29 2024 12.57am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

CONservative government incompetence.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 270 of 603 < 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 >

  

silvertop Flag Portishead 24 Oct 22 9.42am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Well ok, much of that is true, however let's not forget that half the country voted leave and perhaps they have concerns that, while you obviously don't share nor agree with them, don't have to be constantly derided like they are some low setter.

You may like how the EU operates but there are a huge number of people in the UK and in the EU itself that don't to varying levels.

You may not encounter anyone like the 'gammon' you find on here and feel sullied by our presence but let's not forget that we all live on this island and that 'Bristol' mindset you seem to have is itself very much a minority......even amongst remainers.

Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Oct 2022 7.51pm)

Ha, do you know if I spelt out some of my views you will be surprised how right of center some of my views are. Indeed, there are a lot of right-wing thinkers who agree with me on Brexit.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 24 Oct 22 10.46am Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

So we're getting a new Prime Minister today. All done rather rapidly. By-passing some of the bureaucratic/democratic 'red tape', and alienating members of their own party and much of the electorate.
But it was important to reach a decision quickly, otherwise any further delay might cause the UK population to wonder if Government actually knew what they were doing.

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (24 Oct 2022 10.47am)

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 24 Oct 22 10.58am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

So we're getting a new Prime Minister today. All done rather rapidly. By-passing some of the bureaucratic/democratic 'red tape', and alienating members of their own party and much of the electorate.
But it was important to reach a decision quickly, otherwise any further delay might cause the UK population to wonder if Government actually knew what they were doing.

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (24 Oct 2022 10.47am)

Important, especially in these tough times, that the rest of us not labour under any illusions.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Oct 22 11.07am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I would say that your opinions on the global network is at odds with the reality of political and financial decision making that it's you who live in a fantasy rather than me....also the idea that this is a 'conspiracy of the right' just shows how out of touch you are....just as many on the left see the same thing.

As for voting them out! What a joke! Revisit my first line, it doesn't really matter.....their policies on many topics are little different. For example, they all supported the same decisions that brought us to this financial situation.

Also, the establishment conspire to deny other party's media or coverage so that they can limit their growth.

As Farage said, there needs to be big hitters who leave and join a party for there to be a realistic new party.

Also, parties have to sign up to ridiculous socially liberal rules before their can register as a party....this isn't the free society that I was raised in.

So people can't just vote for who they like.....sure they can vote for the Communist party but socially conservative parties have to sign up to trans, equality and alphabet crap that most of their voters don't believe or agree with.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Oct 2022 12.09am)

That some on the left share these ideas doesn't validate them at all. Both look for others to blame.

Of course we can vote them out. All of them if we wish to. Nothing is fixed for all time in politics. If we decide that neither Labour nor Tory now represent our views then we change. I dislike Farage's politics intensely but what he demonstrated was that if sufficient people care about something then a new Party can emerge. I want to see such a new Party, with it's policies firmly in the pragmatic centre, maintaining financial responsibility, not promising what is impossible, lowering expectations whilst encouraging enterprise whilst being up front and honest about it and, above all, setting standards of impeccable integrity. I believe that's what the majority of us want so all that's needed is someone, or something, to finance its start.

Farage was also right about the need for some "big hitters" to leave. I can now see that happening. The kind of Party I want would have no difficulty in signing up to the rules. Whether they should exist at all, is another debate.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Oct 22 11.21am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Not only does it look like Sunak has been installed as the PM of the country, he has been imposed on the party membership as well....it looks like they were deliberately not allowed a vote.

Without a contest it's about as undemocratic as it could possibly be.

I would imagine the Conservative membership are going to be pretty angry. They have been denied a vote on the leader of the their party & their Prime Minister....seemingly deliberately. It could lead to a mass cancellation of memberships from the party.

He doesn't really have any mandate other than that of Tory MPs....well, a bit over half of them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Oct 2022 4.15am)

When we vote at a GE we vote for who will represent us in our constituency. We don't vote for a PM. It is simply the convention that who-ever leads the Party with the largest number of seats has the ability to form a government, as they have the confidence of a sufficient number of MPs.

Should that confidence be lost then Parliament needs to find someone else who can command it.

This is the task of Parliament. With an 80 seat majority it is obviously the largest Party, the Tories, who will choose a new leader who will then be able to form a government.

So this is 100% the job of the Tory MPs. The membership ought have no input. Nor should there be a GE, unless the Tory party splits and fails to back it's chosen leader.

The last thing we need at the moment is a GE. The opposition parties calling for one are just playing politics at a time when that's the last thing needed. They should be ashamed.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Oct 22 12.09pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

Ha, do you know if I spelt out some of my views you will be surprised how right of center some of my views are. Indeed, there are a lot of right-wing thinkers who agree with me on Brexit.

While remainers were a significant minority on the right I doubt many of them would like how you have written about leavers.

As for your other views, while I believe you, we can only go on what you type on here.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Oct 2022 12.17pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 24 Oct 22 12.18pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Labour extending their lead in the latest YouGov 20/21 October:-

Labour 56%
Tories 19%
LibDem 10%

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Oct 22 12.34pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Labour extending their lead in the latest YouGov 20/21 October:-

Labour 56%
Tories 19%
LibDem 10%

That is massive.

I don't think I can remember a lead like that.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Oct 22 12.38pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

When we vote at a GE we vote for who will represent us in our constituency. We don't vote for a PM. It is simply the convention that who-ever leads the Party with the largest number of seats has the ability to form a government, as they have the confidence of a sufficient number of MPs.

Should that confidence be lost then Parliament needs to find someone else who can command it.

This is the task of Parliament. With an 80 seat majority it is obviously the largest Party, the Tories, who will choose a new leader who will then be able to form a government.

So this is 100% the job of the Tory MPs. The membership ought have no input. Nor should there be a GE, unless the Tory party splits and fails to back it's chosen leader.

The last thing we need at the moment is a GE. The opposition parties calling for one are just playing politics at a time when that's the last thing needed. They should be ashamed.

Obviously, as has been stated many times, I refute what you think on what should be the power balance between MPs and voters in general.

I don't wish to continually repeat this though so I'd rather ask you the question that if you don't think the membership should have any input on who leads their party....just what are a membership there for then? Just to pay their subs and shut up?

While obviously I had no time for Corbyn in general, he was the choice of the Labour membership and they had a far more democratic process than anyone else. I respected that.

Using your own mantra against you WE, perhaps it is you who needs to embrace change because you seem rather stuck in your ways.

I believe that decentralisation better fits human nature and is a bulwark against authoritarianism. Anything that permanently moves towards centralisation has to have secure safeguards against that for me.....A rather amusing part of my politics considering the far left think I'm a Nazi.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Oct 2022 12.53pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 24 Oct 22 12.59pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

That is massive.

I don't think I can remember a lead like that.


It makes no difference. Our political system is like a s*** sponge cake. You might be able to put a different colour of icing over it, and have some variety in terms of the decorations on top of it but ultimately it is the same product.

The cake needs throwing in the bin. As simple as that. On the DR, we are wasting time trying to play the decorating game.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Oct 22 1.23pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Obviously, as has been stated many times, I refute what you think on what should be the power balance between MPs and voters in general.

I don't wish to continually repeat this though so I'd rather ask you the question that if you don't think the membership should have any input on who leads their party....just what are a membership there for then? Just to pay their subs and shut up?

While obviously I had no time for Corbyn in general, he was the choice of the Labour membership and they had a far more democratic process than anyone else. I respected that.

Using your own mantra against you WE, perhaps it is you who needs to embrace change because you seem rather stuck in your ways.

I believe that decentralisation better fits human nature and is a bulwark against authoritarianism. Anything that permanently moves towards centralisation has to have secure safeguards against that for me.....A rather amusing part of my politics considering the far left think I'm a Nazi.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Oct 2022 12.53pm)

Whether you disagree with what should be our system or not, it’s what we have. By all means campaign for a more direct one but until then we will be using what is and not what you want.

The membership have the responsibility of choosing who their party puts forward as a candidate in their constituency. If they make a wise decision and we choose them then they represent us all. That’s their role, along with helping their candidate campaign, Between elections our MP does everything politically and the membership have no special influence, or at least should not.

I want change! Just not the sort you do. I want more parties and PR.

Decentralisation is fine when the decisions needed are local. They are not when they affect more widely. A common sense rather than an ideological approach is required.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 24 Oct 22 1.45pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

That is massive.

I don't think I can remember a lead like that.

the figures are impressive, but usually polls show some kind of mid-term dissatisfaction with Government, which is much less pronounced/reversed when it comes to GE time.

There are always people (let's call England a two-party system for simplification) who stoically vote Labour or Conservative. Generally it's about 20%each, with the rest potential swinging voters. with another percentage of spoiled ballots, voting for much smaller parties, or not voting at all.

Labour have hardly had any airtime by comparison to the Government. So the lead is very big indeed. If Starmer et al. actually came out with something to say, heading into an election, they could even increase their poll lead

 


I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 270 of 603 < 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > CONservative government incompetence.