This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Spiderman Horsham 14 Sep 21 7.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
For me, and I probably have my ‘simple’ head on but people should be able to live where they want and be allowed to make a better left for themselves. These ppl are desperate, sleeping in dangerous conditions. The money we give to France, can we need build new communities, schools etc.., I read that only a small % of the uk is actually built on. My British passport allows me to visit many countries, the majority of them without a visa. But if you have a different passport, you might not be so lucky. How is this fair? Fortunately this problem is not going away and there is nothing that can really be done. Thousands of ppl Not having a go at you but that is a very simplistic view. If your ideas came to fruition would you be happy to allow foreign convicted murderers/rapists/ paedos to enter unchecked? Believe me that will happen, as some try to enter now, I have seen them. There are many reasons for certain countries to require a visa, some political, some reciprocal, some for security reasons. Edited by Spiderman (14 Sep 2021 7.32am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Sep 21 7.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kuge
Why is there no comparison between previous large groups of immigrants that entered Britain and the groups that you are focus on? What evidence is there that crime and immigration have been linked for hundreds of years? This post suggests that in the case of the Huguenot they pretty much only brought benefits to Britain. Come off it. You are choosing one example of a specific group of immigrants and claiming them to be representative of immigrants as a whole. Huguenots were French Protestants. Hardly different culturally, and that many people probably come here every week now. I'm sorry, but you are starting to bore me. We have heard all this denial nonsense from others like you for years, and it does not tally with the real world. Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Sep 21 8.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kuge
This is getting tiresome. You show correlation, but you do not show causality. Is very very simple. You could say that the Beatles became popular in the 1960s and crime when up, therefore the Beatles caused an increase in crime. This is what you are doing. I know this is going to hurt you terribly but I don't think I can take your responses seriously either. Glad that you are enjoying the book. I gave mine away so I don't have it to hand. Did you download it to a Kindel? I might go back and read it again. Anyway, I am sure this is not so much adieu as au revoir. Just like the Godfather 3 you pull me back in. Really, it's like blaming the Beatles is it? You know fundamentally that once these increases in percentage rate of homicides are proven you only have to look at the percentage ethnicity of criminals in prisons for different crimes. That shows where the percentage increases in violent crime and murder come from over the host ethnicity. Your problem is that once it's shown that increases are real that you want to shift the cause onto inequalities....apparently happy with that one cause where in reality there is rarely always one cause...as you recognised with Rome. Essentially once the statistics are recognised all the rational causes other than mass immigration also fall on the sacred cows of your ideology such as social liberalism....So you avoid these responsibilities like the plague instead preferring to shift the entire weight onto willfully unrealistic 'inequality'....something that does contribute to many outcomes but rarely on its own. Oh and I downloaded the book on Audible, which has a cost effective monthly deal. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 9.09am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 14 Sep 21 9.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am) did the French outlaw the collection of such data. You have crime statistics, and then you have demographic statistics. But never the twain shall meet. any day now in the UK also ? Wilful ignorance just to keep the PC brigade happy ( or less angry ). Edited by PalazioVecchio (14 Sep 2021 9.09am)
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kuge Peckham 14 Sep 21 9.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Just like the Godfather 3 you pull me back in. Really, it's like blaming the Beatles is it? You know fundamentally that once these increases in percentage rate of homicides are proven you only have to look at the percentage ethnicity of criminals in prisons for different crimes. That shows where the percentage increases in violent crime and murder come from over the host ethnicity. Your problem is that once its shown that increases are real that you want to shift the cause onto inequalities....apparently happy with that one cause where in reality there is rarely always one cause...as you recognised with Rome. Essentially once the statistics are recognised all the rational causes other than mass immigration also fall on the sacred cows of your ideology such as social liberalism....So you avoid these responsibilities like the plague instead preferring to shift the entire weight onto willfully unrealistic 'inequality'....something that does contribute to many outcomes but rarely on its own. Oh and I downloaded the book on Audible, which has a cost effective monthly deal. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 8.11am) Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will.
Canada Germany Italy USA
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Sep 21 9.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kuge
Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will. Ye
Canada Germany Italy USA
What these studies seem to be saying is that immigration itself and crime are not directly linked. That is obvious. What it also suggests is that the limited opportunities afforded to many immigrants does have an effect on crime. Again obvious. What it actually means is that immigrants are more likely to commit crime. Also, it does not cover the people who are second generation and third generation. The fact that you can call yourself British and were born here does not alter the root causes. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 9.31am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Sep 21 9.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kuge
Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will.
Canada Germany Italy USA
Even a layman can use a simple search of the historical crime data and see for themselves. A simple look at the prison population tells the truth......Like here, they talk about immigrants making up only one eighth of the prison population....that's a deliberate disingenuous use of immigrant...ignoring second and third generations, ignoring ethnicity....in fact deliberately doing whatever they can to fit the result they want to show. I suspect these studies are looking for a result to fit ideology. Like you academics are mostly on the left and they are part of the power structure. They are scared of results that would lead to job loss and abandonment. So like you, they make it work by omission and explanations. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 9.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kuge Peckham 14 Sep 21 9.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Come off it. You are choosing one example of a specific group of immigrants and claiming them to be representative of immigrants as a whole. Huguenots were French Protestants. Hardly different culturally, and that many people probably come here every week now. I'm sorry, but you are starting to bore me. We have heard all this denial nonsense from others like you for years, and it does not tally with the real world. Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am) So want to discuss immigration into Britain but not before a certain date and only regarding groups above a certain number? You suggest that past experience with immigration into the UK has no relevance but seek to establish a parallel with events over a thousand five hundred years ago. I have posted links above that clearly show immigration does not lead to a rise in crime. This is both in the UK and globally. These are long-term studies that look at trends over decades. Regarding the 50,000 Hugonotes that came to Britain. It is not the same as the number of immigrants that come to Britain in one week. In 2019 614,000 immigrants arrive, however, net immigration was 221,000. (These figures contain overseas students and other that will return home after their study end). That is 4,250 a week. Denial is a word that you use a lot. It characterises much of what you post. If you are bored find something interesting to do. Personally, I find going to the gym helps.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Sep 21 9.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kuge
So want to discuss immigration into Britain but not before a certain date and only regarding groups above a certain number? You suggest that past experience with immigration into the UK has no relevance but seek to establish a parallel with events over a thousand five hundred years ago. I have posted links above that clearly show immigration does not lead to a rise in crime. This is both in the UK and globally. These are long-term studies that look at trends over decades. Regarding the 50,000 Hugonotes that came to Britain. It is not the same as the number of immigrants that come to Britain in one week. In 2019 614,000 immigrants arrive, however, net immigration was 221,000. (These figures contain overseas students and other that will return home after their study end). That is 4,250 a week. Denial is a word that you use a lot. It characterises much of what you post. If you are bored find something interesting to do. Personally, I find going to the gym helps. I have a gym at home. I don't need to go to a gym. So we get the same amount of people here in roughly 10 weeks as your Huguenots in total. And you think that pointing that out strengthens your case? You are talking in riddles, and I have done with debating with a pseudo intellectual with nothing to offer. I'm off to lift weights in my gym.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kuge Peckham 14 Sep 21 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What these studies seem to be saying is that immigration itself and crime are not directly linked. That is obvious. What it also suggests is that the limited opportunities afforded to many immigrants does have an effect on crime. Again obvious. What it actually means is that immigrants are more likely to commit crime. Also, it does not cover the people who are second generation and third generation. The fact that you can call yourself British and were born here does not alter the root causes. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 9.31am) I think that you had better publish your findings in a research paper. I am sure that academics in this field will be fascinated to see methodology and analysis. One wonders why there is globally no research that supports your position. There is a lot of research out there. I have posted 20 links that examine this subject. Can you show me some academic papers that show crime rising in relation to immegration? As regard the limited opportunities afforded to immigrants this is constant across the demographic so it also affects opportunities for people born in the UK. What is clear is that poverty and deprivation are directly linked to crime and sadly these impinge on many. There is research into second-generation crime. It's easy to find and it too does not support what you say.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kuge Peckham 14 Sep 21 10.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Even a layman can use a simple search of the historical crime data and see for themselves. A simple look at the prison population tells the truth......Like here, they talk about immigrants making up only one eighth of the prison population....that's a deliberate disingenuous use of immigrant...ignoring second and third generations, ignoring ethnicity....in fact deliberately doing whatever they can to fit the result they want to show. I suspect these studies are looking for a result to fit ideology. Like you academics are mostly on the left and they are part of the power structure. They are scared of results that would lead to job loss and abandonment. So like you, they make it work by omission and explanations. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 9.36am) Ah, this is the 'had enough of experts' position and better the view of the layman. You dismissed the research papers because they do not look back far enough, but the immigration that Britain experienced in the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20 centuries is not relevant. You say that you are interested in immigration immediately post WWII and then you express concern about immigrants arriving today. "Like you academics are mostly on the left". Have you been in a university recently or ever? I can assure you that there are plenty of academics from the right. Oxbridge is full of public school educated upper middle class people that vote tory.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Sep 21 10.37am | |
---|---|
For evidence of exactly what we are dealing with in terms of simple truth read this response to an attempt to find out information. Deliberately avoiding the chap's attempt to discover which ethnic groups are committing what crimes at what percent. Also, look into this exchange and observe how difficult it is to get honest responses. I had a look at the stats given and I couldn't find an honest response to what he said. Looking into the prison data it was also hard to find what I was looking for, buried deep within one of them I found this: 'Overrepresentation of BAME individuals So we have to rely upon Lammy to actually look for the stats and only because he's take on it is to blame 'racism' in white society. When the stark reality is that the 'whites' that hold authority positions are doing all they can to avoid the honest conclusions. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 10.44am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.