This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Theresa May
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Kermit8  Hevon 08 Jul 17 1.13am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The NHS is neither capitalist nor socialist, it is a public service like the fire service, the police, the armed forces, refuse collection etc. As mentioned before, the Tories would have created n NHS had they won the 1945 Election. The electorate didn't think so which is why they voted the Tories out. They trusted Labour and the Left more to deliver such a thing and they were correct in that.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
susmik  PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 08 Jul 17 11.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
The electorate didn't think so which is why they voted the Tories out. They trusted Labour and the Left more to deliver such a thing and they were correct in that. BUT the Tories are STILL in power so where does the voted them out come in ??
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 08 Jul 17 11.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by susmik
BUT the Tories are STILL in power so where does the voted them out come in ?? Precisely. The Conservative party increased it's vote both absolutely and as a share of the votes cast.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 08 Jul 17 11.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Precisely. The Conservative party increased it's vote both absolutely and as a share of the votes cast. Not in 1945 they didn't please follow the thread.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 08 Jul 17 12.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Not in 1945 they didn't please follow the thread. You taken your meds today??
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 08 Jul 17 12.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by susmik
You taken your meds today??
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jul 17 12.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I can. I chose not to. Now what was the question. I hope it was to do with the thread subject Theresa May or are you trying to derail it again now that the WW2 deflection has petered out? You won't tell me what you consider rich because your whole outlook is half baked and based on your own personal jealousy of people who are better off than you. Typical socialist.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 08 Jul 17 12.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You won't tell me what you consider rich because your whole outlook is half baked and based on your own personal jealousy of people who are better off than you. Typical socialist. here we go, edging towards the politics of envy argument I see. More complete s***e to add to lost it, etc etc. When you and your sort use the politics of envy argument it's because, (to anyone with an ounce of sense) that's easier than justifying deaths due to austerity or people getting away with some pretty questionable stuff (for instance) which you patently support. Politics of envy , no. Politics of fairness. Yes. I dunno how to define rich, having some disposable income would be rich for some people. I've no problem with people being rich as long as they pay their fair share and don't exploit others. Also incorporated into this are multinationals or large companies that do their best to not pay their fair share. As an aside, for someone who has posted in this thread a bit, you haven't really mentioned Theresa May have you? Why is this? Edited by nickgusset (08 Jul 2017 12.44pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jul 17 12.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
When you and your sort use the politics of envy argument it's because, (to anyone with an ounce of sense) that's easier than justifying deaths due to austerity or people getting away with some pretty questionable stuff (for instance) which you patently support. Politics of envy , no. Politics of fairness. Yes. I dunno how to define rich, having some disposable income would be rich for some people. I've no problem with people being rich as long as they pay their fair share and don't exploit others. Also incorporated into this are multinationals or large companies that do their best to not pay their fair share. Edited by nickgusset (08 Jul 2017 12.38pm) Half baked twaddle. Thought so. Your politics is Lennonesque. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (08 Jul 2017 12.49pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 08 Jul 17 1.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Half baked twaddle. Thought so. Your politics is Lennonesque. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (08 Jul 2017 12.49pm) But what about Theresa May? Yer very quick to jump on left wing posters but you never actually seem to have anything of any substance about the topic in hand to say. You could for instance say that she has done well to stay in power after a tumultuous few weeks for her and allude that tories are notoriously good for clinging onto power once they are in. Perhaps you could argue that other tories don't think that this is the right time to launch a coup. You could even comment on your thoughts about the constant promises of immigration (your specialist subject although your understanding appears to be very one dimensional) being taken down to the tens of thousands but actually going up.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jul 17 1.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
But what about Theresa May? Yer very quick to jump on left wing posters but you never actually seem to have anything of any substance about the topic in hand to say. You could for instance say that she has done well to stay in power after a tumultuous few weeks for her and allude that tories are notoriously good for clinging onto power once they are in. Perhaps you could argue that other tories don't think that this is the right time to launch a coup. You could even comment on your thoughts about the constant promises of immigration (your specialist subject although your understanding appears to be very one dimensional) being taken down to the tens of thousands but actually going up. Your Labour minion waffle is tedious and not worthy of response. You don't come on here to debate, you are just a union/Labour drone.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 08 Jul 17 1.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Your Labour minion waffle is tedious and not worthy of response. You don't come on here to debate, you are just a union/Labour drone.
A litany of 'Left-Wing' emotive rheoric as part of 'Gusseting'.Bathtime wind burbling to the surface, spoon-feeding us warm diarrhoea.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.