Not yet. Just a question, but with election interference now rife and cyber warfare more effective at attacking the soft underbelly of western democracy you have to wonder.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Nevertheless. He said it so must bear responsibility otherwise this mantra about MPs taking decisions for us actually means civil servants taking decisions and we can't vote for them.

Mark Steyn and “excellent” are not words that sit comfortably together, in too many places.

He has a somewhat checkered reputation.

[Link]

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The claim was that 99% of those who caught Covid recovered. Not that 1% of the population were going to die.

Teddy Eagle just in case you were wondering. The UK mortality rate was 0.9%

[Link]

Obviously we now know that death by covid was greatly over exagerated. Even falling off a ladder or being hit by a bus once you had a "positive" test you died from covid.

I would say that would be be closer to 0.4/5 in anycase that still leaves a over 99% survival rate.

It seemed the younger population had every risk in taking the vaccine and no benefits.

Anyone, not just on these boards but also in the public eye, who questioned how they can make something SAFE for human consumption in only 10 months, was discredited and demonised by you.

It's out in the open finally, that those that questioned were right to do so. They weren't doing it out of hate, on the contrary, they did it because their compassion and empathy for humanity compelled them to.

You think you can just carry on pushing your drivel?
You disgust me.