You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 7.54am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 262 of 311 < 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 >

Topic Locked

matt_himself Flag Matataland 19 Apr 15 1.39pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 12.55pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 12.13pm

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 10.22am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 9.38am

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 9.16am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 6.41am

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 7.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 Apr 2015 6.50pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 6.41pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 Apr 2015 6.08pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 3.19pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Apr 2015 2.38pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 1.47pm

The more ideologically driven someone is the more they fall into the trap of simplifying people and the political landscape. It just seems like a bad starting point.

Jamie doesn't come in for quite so much criticism as the rest of us because he's fair, self aware, not waving a finger at anyone, and generally has really fleshed out ideas about the world.

As for debate, almost everyone is constantly looking to reaffirm their own ideas, rather than change their mind about anything. Which in and of itself suggests that on some level we all know we hold somewhat brainwashed views of the world.

Edited by imbored (18 Apr 2015 1.50pm)


Jamie does, in fact, come into quite a lot of criticism.

I'd agree with your opinion that's he as a very good poster, independent of whether people agree with him or not, that's recognised by many, including me.

However, you're wrong to accuse me or something yet ignore it when Jamie on the very same page has done the very same thing.

I don't really have an issue with the 'lefty righty' generalization thing in practice....How could I as I use it myself....I was only pointing out that I thought Jamie's point was wrong about the right's general attitude towards the NHS and Welfare.

You've kind of blown up that point......It isn't that big a deal.

People can, 'lefty righty' away as much as they like, surely.....And posters can tell them they are talking BS in reply.

That's apart of the knockabout. And sometimes people's views are informed.....And yes, indeed, sometimes altered.

I've been informed by the forum and some of my views altered by posters whose views I read and respect.....Right or left or neither.

A closed mind is a limited one.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Apr 2015 2.40pm)

Yes I agree on the knockabout point on here, there's definitely something to that. I'm sure people would find more commonality in person. I can see it now. Matt and Nick, arm in arm.


If you were a true Palace fan, you wouldn't have posted that at 3.19 on a Saturday match day.

You would have been otherwise occupied.

Troll.

Ever heard of a laptop, Matt? I often comment in game threads during live games too. Is that okay with you? It seems I need to check.

Troll this, troll that. Get back to making Columbo style sweeping generalisations of the black community picked up while trying to get your end away. That's more entertaining .

No sale. The dig in the second paragraph is trolling. So when you are denying trolling, you are trolling to do this!



You throw all sorts of expletives and crudeness at people on here and you know it. Unless you're completely lacking in self awareness you're as much as a 'troll' as you accuse me of being. You just get annoyed that I don't take the bait like Nick sometimes unfortunately does.

Edited by imbored (18 Apr 2015 7.02pm)


I am not annoyed at you. You are using deflection tactics to hide the fact that you are a troll, who targets me and uses multiple usernames to do so.

It's quite touching that you do troll me but ultimately pointless and I understand what you are about and will question you and your motives.


I wasn't even talking to you in this thread when you came stomping in launching an attack on me for replying to someone during a match.

There is no motive towards you, talk about self importance. I'm happy not to talk to you, but then we'll get to see who the real troll is, because you'll continue to carry on just as you have here with your 'attack then play victim' routine. You take the forum too seriously. I won't take the bait and am not getting dragged into the Matt Vortex today so will leave you to your Sunday seething, while I have my Sunday roast .


Have a look back a few pages. You, Michael and Peffers are having a circle jerk about Peffers voting UKIP. What was you comment? 'Having a foreign wife or girlfriend helps [if you vote UKIP]'. Quote clearly directed, at least in part, at me and designed to bait. You knew what you were trying to do and don't patronise me by coming back and saying that my 'self importance' is deluding my opinion of you.

All of this talk of you being a victim and 'nasty Matt' targeting you is bollocks. You are a troll, pure and simple. I will give you credit for the fact that you hide it behind some eloquent and tactical aware posts, however you don't fool me.

Anyhow, it's been over a month since you last changed your username so will it be time soon that you turn up with a new Moniker.

I was talking about Nigel Farage. You were not even part of that discussion either. It's you who is overly concerned with me. When someone tells you they won't even talk to you if you don't want them to, and then you keep going on and on that tells you all you need to know.

Like I said, I'm not getting sucked into the Matt vortex. It's pointless. Got to make dinner, go rant at Nick instead

You are running away because you don't have a leg to stand on. You know I have the measure of you and your baiting tactics.

I bet you masturbate whilst posting this bile.

Ah, the Gusset insult. As limp as Pele's cock.

What I have posted is not bile. It's factual. I think you know in your heart of hearts that 'Think/Iambored' is a troll.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 19 Apr 15 2.14pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 1.39pm

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 12.55pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 12.13pm

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 10.22am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 9.38am

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 9.16am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 6.41am

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 7.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 Apr 2015 6.50pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 6.41pm

Quote matt_himself at 18 Apr 2015 6.08pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 3.19pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Apr 2015 2.38pm

Quote imbored at 18 Apr 2015 1.47pm

The more ideologically driven someone is the more they fall into the trap of simplifying people and the political landscape. It just seems like a bad starting point.

Jamie doesn't come in for quite so much criticism as the rest of us because he's fair, self aware, not waving a finger at anyone, and generally has really fleshed out ideas about the world.

As for debate, almost everyone is constantly looking to reaffirm their own ideas, rather than change their mind about anything. Which in and of itself suggests that on some level we all know we hold somewhat brainwashed views of the world.

Edited by imbored (18 Apr 2015 1.50pm)


Jamie does, in fact, come into quite a lot of criticism.

I'd agree with your opinion that's he as a very good poster, independent of whether people agree with him or not, that's recognised by many, including me.

However, you're wrong to accuse me or something yet ignore it when Jamie on the very same page has done the very same thing.

I don't really have an issue with the 'lefty righty' generalization thing in practice....How could I as I use it myself....I was only pointing out that I thought Jamie's point was wrong about the right's general attitude towards the NHS and Welfare.

You've kind of blown up that point......It isn't that big a deal.

People can, 'lefty righty' away as much as they like, surely.....And posters can tell them they are talking BS in reply.

That's apart of the knockabout. And sometimes people's views are informed.....And yes, indeed, sometimes altered.

I've been informed by the forum and some of my views altered by posters whose views I read and respect.....Right or left or neither.

A closed mind is a limited one.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Apr 2015 2.40pm)

Yes I agree on the knockabout point on here, there's definitely something to that. I'm sure people would find more commonality in person. I can see it now. Matt and Nick, arm in arm.


If you were a true Palace fan, you wouldn't have posted that at 3.19 on a Saturday match day.

You would have been otherwise occupied.

Troll.

Ever heard of a laptop, Matt? I often comment in game threads during live games too. Is that okay with you? It seems I need to check.

Troll this, troll that. Get back to making Columbo style sweeping generalisations of the black community picked up while trying to get your end away. That's more entertaining .

No sale. The dig in the second paragraph is trolling. So when you are denying trolling, you are trolling to do this!



You throw all sorts of expletives and crudeness at people on here and you know it. Unless you're completely lacking in self awareness you're as much as a 'troll' as you accuse me of being. You just get annoyed that I don't take the bait like Nick sometimes unfortunately does.

Edited by imbored (18 Apr 2015 7.02pm)


I am not annoyed at you. You are using deflection tactics to hide the fact that you are a troll, who targets me and uses multiple usernames to do so.

It's quite touching that you do troll me but ultimately pointless and I understand what you are about and will question you and your motives.


I wasn't even talking to you in this thread when you came stomping in launching an attack on me for replying to someone during a match.

There is no motive towards you, talk about self importance. I'm happy not to talk to you, but then we'll get to see who the real troll is, because you'll continue to carry on just as you have here with your 'attack then play victim' routine. You take the forum too seriously. I won't take the bait and am not getting dragged into the Matt Vortex today so will leave you to your Sunday seething, while I have my Sunday roast .


Have a look back a few pages. You, Michael and Peffers are having a circle jerk about Peffers voting UKIP. What was you comment? 'Having a foreign wife or girlfriend helps [if you vote UKIP]'. Quote clearly directed, at least in part, at me and designed to bait. You knew what you were trying to do and don't patronise me by coming back and saying that my 'self importance' is deluding my opinion of you.

All of this talk of you being a victim and 'nasty Matt' targeting you is bollocks. You are a troll, pure and simple. I will give you credit for the fact that you hide it behind some eloquent and tactical aware posts, however you don't fool me.

Anyhow, it's been over a month since you last changed your username so will it be time soon that you turn up with a new Moniker.

I was talking about Nigel Farage. You were not even part of that discussion either. It's you who is overly concerned with me. When someone tells you they won't even talk to you if you don't want them to, and then you keep going on and on that tells you all you need to know.

Like I said, I'm not getting sucked into the Matt vortex. It's pointless. Got to make dinner, go rant at Nick instead

You are running away because you don't have a leg to stand on. You know I have the measure of you and your baiting tactics.

I bet you masturbate whilst posting this bile.

Ah, the Gusset insult. As limp as Pele's cock.

What I have posted is not bile. It's factual. I think you know in your heart of hearts that 'Think/Iambored' is a troll.


I think you make completely inaccurate assumptions. You never talk about the thread subjects.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 19 Apr 15 3.00pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

a Gusset deflection - we Nearly got full house in 'Gusset Bungo'. All we need is a menstrual, misunderstood and misdirected rant on how how I 'don't care that people are going to food banks' and we have the lot.

Are you going to answer my question from last week on what constitutes a 'worker'?

In your words 'tick tock'.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 19 Apr 15 3.10pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.00pm

a Gusset deflection - we Nearly got full house in 'Gusset Bungo'. All we need is a menstrual, misunderstood and misdirected rant on how how I 'don't care that people are going to food banks' and we have the lot.

Are you going to answer my question from last week on what constitutes a 'worker'?

In your words 'tick tock'.


You don't know what a worker is? Lolz.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 19 Apr 15 3.31pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 3.10pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.00pm

a Gusset deflection - we Nearly got full house in 'Gusset Bungo'. All we need is a menstrual, misunderstood and misdirected rant on how how I 'don't care that people are going to food banks' and we have the lot.

Are you going to answer my question from last week on what constitutes a 'worker'?

In your words 'tick tock'.


You don't know what a worker is? Lolz.


Another deflection.

For f***s sake Gusset, it is a simple question. What is the lefts definition of 'worker' in post post modern society? Surely the left has changed its perspective on the Original Marxist definitions of society given that globalisation has fragmented traditional groupings.

I suspect you don't know the definition of 'worker'.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 19 Apr 15 3.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.31pm

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 3.10pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.00pm

a Gusset deflection - we Nearly got full house in 'Gusset Bungo'. All we need is a menstrual, misunderstood and misdirected rant on how how I 'don't care that people are going to food banks' and we have the lot.

Are you going to answer my question from last week on what constitutes a 'worker'?

In your words 'tick tock'.


You don't know what a worker is? Lolz.


Another deflection.

For f***s sake Gusset, it is a simple question. What is the lefts definition of 'worker' in post post modern society? Surely the left has changed its perspective on the Original Marxist definitions of society given that globalisation has fragmented traditional groupings.

I suspect you don't know the definition of 'worker'.


Suspect away. Should I provide a link like you did when you were asked about aspects of UKIP s manifesto?
I'm not playing your games today Matt. I'm going to cook a lovely roast for me and my family whilst you sit home alone getting your kicks on an Internet forum.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 19 Apr 15 8.08pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 19 Apr 2015 11.27am

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 11.15am

Hmm. Do they really have a clue?


Nuclear is sustainable energy.


NO..NO..NO.

Forgetting the pollution aspects and the pure expense.

Life span at CURRENT usage is 200 years, imagine how long that would last if were to replace coal and oil just in Western Europe.

Too make it anyway useful you would need to develop / invent fast breeder tech or learn to extract uranium from sea water. But you may as well burn money if possible at all.

BTW...does anyone know who matt means when he talks of trolls with multiple log ons?

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 19 Apr 15 8.20pm

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 10.22am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 9.38am

Have a look back a few pages. You, Michael and Peffers are having a circle jerk about Peffers voting UKIP. What was you comment? 'Having a foreign wife or girlfriend helps [if you vote UKIP]'. Quote clearly directed, at least in part, at me and designed to bait. You knew what you were trying to do and don't patronise me by coming back and saying that my 'self importance' is deluding my opinion of you.

All of this talk of you being a victim and 'nasty Matt' targeting you is bollocks. You are a troll, pure and simple. I will give you credit for the fact that you hide it behind some eloquent and tactical aware posts, however you don't fool me.

Anyhow, it's been over a month since you last changed your username so will it be time soon that you turn up with a new Moniker.

I was talking about Nigel Farage. You were not even part of that discussion either. It's you who is overly concerned with me. When someone tells you they won't even talk to you if you don't want them to, and then you keep going on and on that tells you all you need to know.

Like I said, I'm not getting sucked into the Matt vortex. It's pointless. Got to make dinner, go rant at Nick instead


Upsetting that UKIP supporters don't want my vote.

Personally, I was talking about Farage, I had no idea Matt had purchased a wife. I thought that would make you more open to immigration?!


 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 20 Apr 15 6.17am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 3.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.31pm

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 3.10pm

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 3.00pm

a Gusset deflection - we Nearly got full house in 'Gusset Bungo'. All we need is a menstrual, misunderstood and misdirected rant on how how I 'don't care that people are going to food banks' and we have the lot.

Are you going to answer my question from last week on what constitutes a 'worker'?

In your words 'tick tock'.


You don't know what a worker is? Lolz.


Another deflection.

For f***s sake Gusset, it is a simple question. What is the lefts definition of 'worker' in post post modern society? Surely the left has changed its perspective on the Original Marxist definitions of society given that globalisation has fragmented traditional groupings.

I suspect you don't know the definition of 'worker'.


Suspect away. Should I provide a link like you did when you were asked about aspects of UKIP s manifesto?
I'm not playing your games today Matt. I'm going to cook a lovely roast for me and my family whilst you sit home alone getting your kicks on an Internet forum.


Another Gusset insult and deflection and incorrect assumption.

The hat trick.

Look forward to your explanation of the term 'worker' in due course.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 20 Apr 15 6.18am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote pefwin at 19 Apr 2015 8.20pm

Quote imbored at 19 Apr 2015 10.22am

Quote matt_himself at 19 Apr 2015 9.38am

Have a look back a few pages. You, Michael and Peffers are having a circle jerk about Peffers voting UKIP. What was you comment? 'Having a foreign wife or girlfriend helps [if you vote UKIP]'. Quote clearly directed, at least in part, at me and designed to bait. You knew what you were trying to do and don't patronise me by coming back and saying that my 'self importance' is deluding my opinion of you.

All of this talk of you being a victim and 'nasty Matt' targeting you is bollocks. You are a troll, pure and simple. I will give you credit for the fact that you hide it behind some eloquent and tactical aware posts, however you don't fool me.

Anyhow, it's been over a month since you last changed your username so will it be time soon that you turn up with a new Moniker.

I was talking about Nigel Farage. You were not even part of that discussion either. It's you who is overly concerned with me. When someone tells you they won't even talk to you if you don't want them to, and then you keep going on and on that tells you all you need to know.

Like I said, I'm not getting sucked into the Matt vortex. It's pointless. Got to make dinner, go rant at Nick instead


Upsetting that UKIP supporters don't want my vote.

Personally, I was talking about Farage, I had no idea Matt had purchased a wife. I thought that would make you more open to immigration?!


Pefwin - the 2015 version of Hale and Pace.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
matt_himself Flag Matataland 20 Apr 15 6.21am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote pefwin at 19 Apr 2015 8.08pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 19 Apr 2015 11.27am

Quote nickgusset at 19 Apr 2015 11.15am

Hmm. Do they really have a clue?


Nuclear is sustainable energy.


NO..NO..NO.

Forgetting the pollution aspects and the pure expense.

Life span at CURRENT usage is 200 years, imagine how long that would last if were to replace coal and oil just in Western Europe.

Too make it anyway useful you would need to develop / invent fast breeder tech or learn to extract uranium from sea water. But you may as well burn money if possible at all.

BTW...does anyone know who matt means when he talks of trolls with multiple log ons?


'Iambored' has used multiple usernames in the past, including 'Think'. It is fairly obvious Peffers, the accusations were addressed to 'Iambored'. A child could have worked that out.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 20 Apr 15 7.14am

[Link]

Food for thought.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 262 of 311 < 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic