This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Teddy Eagle 02 Jul 23 2.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
When are they going to go underarm? They've already tried underhand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 02 Jul 23 2.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
When are they going to go underarm? Give it time
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jul 23 2.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
They've already tried underhand. Twice in two matches they've failed to get the hand under - one given, one not.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 02 Jul 23 3.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Twice in two matches they've failed to get the hand under - one given, one not. Smith got two under but it didn't help.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 02 Jul 23 3.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by monkey
Broad needs to leave it now I think, he’s still chuntering away at them even as they’re coming off. Aussie management de added investigation into their players getting abused in the Long Room! Wait until the next test
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jul 23 3.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Smith got two under but it didn't help. I hope it's the moment of the match.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jul 23 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Disappointing
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The groover Danbury 02 Jul 23 5.08pm | |
---|---|
I supposed that had to come up with a new way to cheat since they can't use sand paper this time!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jul 23 5.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The groover
I supposed that had to come up with a new way to cheat since they can't use sand paper this time! No one's happy about it. They have no idea of the spirit of the game in any sport. They're like 11 Nick Kyrgios'.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 02 Jul 23 6.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
No one's happy about it. They have no idea of the spirit of the game in any sport. They're like 11 Nick Kyrgios'. The laws of the game state: "The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the bowler's end umpire that the fielding side and both batters at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play." Carey clearly did not think the ball was dead - he threw it as soon as he could. Bairstow did believe it to be dead, with the added variable being the end of the over. The key seems to be standing umpire Ahsan Raza, who was not watching the action and preparing to return a cap to bowler Green as the ball hit the stumps. The fact that both batsman considered the ball to be dead is further enhanced by the fact that the standing umpire was not watching, which implies that he thought the ball was dead too. The fielding side obviously think it was in play, so the only unbiased opinion is that of the umpire who appeared to think that the ball was dead by his actions.
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 02 Jul 23 9.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
The laws of the game state: "The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the bowler's end umpire that the fielding side and both batters at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play." Carey clearly did not think the ball was dead - he threw it as soon as he could. Bairstow did believe it to be dead, with the added variable being the end of the over. The key seems to be standing umpire Ahsan Raza, who was not watching the action and preparing to return a cap to bowler Green as the ball hit the stumps. The fact that both batsman considered the ball to be dead is further enhanced by the fact that the standing umpire was not watching, which implies that he thought the ball was dead too. The fielding side obviously think it was in play, so the only unbiased opinion is that of the umpire who appeared to think that the ball was dead by his actions. Am I alone in wanting to slap Labuschagne?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CPFC Dartford Dartford 02 Jul 23 10.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Am I alone in wanting to slap Labuschagne? Not at all, can I go first!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.