And if that is better for the uk then I agree it to be the correct decision. 7 years until then so we should know if brexit worked or not.

As all we have heard from people like you are the childish epithets like "remoaners" the clear conclusion is you have no idea what you are talking about.

A battle has been lost. The next started almost a year ago but for the time being it is enough for the "enemy" to continue to shoot themselves in the feet.

There won't be any "resistance" at all. No-one wants to make things worse. Time is all that's needed. When the time is right the arguments and reminders will begin. Quietly at first but eventually the demands will become overwhelming and then the politics will react. We will rejoin. You can bet your house on it.

There will still be the hard-core group who think like you and will be moaning in perpetuity about us "taking our country back". It's ever been so, but they are a small and diminishing group. What happened in 2016 wasn't a reflection of their views. It was just an unfortunate combination of events that conspired together.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Defo matov. See a bit of a difference here as a majority of brexiteers are happy to give it a chance and if it goes south then nothing ventured nothing gained I suppose. Get back in the eu and crack on. I see the opposite with a lot of remainers not wanting to actually give brexit a chance. Maybe bojo should come out and say if it goes pear shaped for us then we would consider rejoining. Open book even if the eu try to play the Oracle on making it bad for us. Then it would backfire as proof on how spiteful that may well be.
Win win for the uk.

Au contraire no problem with them.

Keep them coming....

If you read my consistent argument it is that Parliament had the opportunity but failed to do their duty. There was always a majority who wanted to remain, until the 2019 election. It was Corbyn who actually caused us to Brexit. If he had been replaced and a government of national unity under a compromise PM established we could have turfed Johnson and his cronies out and stopped this.

So whilst I believe in Parliamentary democracy when it fails, as it surely did, then changes need to be considered to avoid a recurrence.

I don't blame the "leavers" at all. They are entitled to their views. They though did not have a majority in Parliament in 2016 and only got one by stealth in 2019.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Being that it's now a done deal, seething about what people believe or believed prior is about as pointless and indeed an equivalent of those who can't let the fact we're no longer in the EU go. Fast forward 10 years and there's bound to be some other pivotal issue that makes 10% on each side view the other as evil incarnate. Slice and dice friendships too much and you end up only talking to yourself whether or not there's somebody in front of you at the time .

I voted leave, but 'remain' or 'leave' are largely becoming dead definitions of people, and were always limited and ill fitting to begin with. Even if there is a push to rejoin it will be from a vocal minority, hence the only way we would ever rejoin would be maybe in a decade plus if somehow it's an unmitigated disaster, combined with things going swimmingly in the EU. If you don't see any of that as a feasible reality to begin with then there's no point wasting energy on hating or disliking as it only impacts you, not the objects of your anger. Leave those who can't let it go to it, instead of becoming one of them!