What conspiracy "theories" do you think I have "pushed"?

All I have ever done is comment on established facts. Establshed by such people as US and British intelligence. That the "liar-in-chief" sought to dismiss them as a "witch hunt" and claimed "complete exoneration" or that Mueller was stymied from indicting him does not mean they are conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are inventions. Assertions made by using a few facts and then weaving them into fiction. Trump's team's involvement with the Russians is an established fact. People were sent to jail because of it, and he is busy pardoning them. Which says a lot to me about his own probable knowledge.

If you haven't yet seen the Dominion CEO explaining why their machines could not be used fraudulently, then look back in this thread. I provided a link to it. It ought to convince even the most sceptical.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It's being mentioned a lot! Most of it with incredulity mind you but it's being covered. No-one at all, except the joke sites like Infowars, are attempting to regard it seriously but that's because there is no evidence being presented. Just wild claims that are being thrown out of courts on a daily basis.

If there is a time bomb ticking then it's been well concealed up to now and as I see no reason at all for any concealment that doesn't seem very likely.

On top of that I don't see any probability that the Dems want, or have the capacity, to mount and keep secret an operation on this scale. If it were true it would finish them for ever and, as it would almost surely be discovered, they would never risk it when the simple way is to just remove him legitimately.

So fraud on this scale seems so unlikely as to be a complete non-starter. It's just not credible.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Not all the truth, no. Some secrets must remain secret. But when they issue a report after an investigation which in turn leads to people being indicted and jailed after judges review the evidence, then you can rightly assume that what they do say is true, whilst there may well be more that cannot yet be said.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Indeed you have hit nail on head ^^^

Or if I might suggest, you have realised long ago that this sort of stuff is boll0x and an excuse for spending more money to fudge a further (in)conclusion.

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (01 Dec 2020 7.32pm)

I disengage, I turn the page.

You pushed conspiracy theories...endlessly repeating Democratic talking points on Trump not being legitimate and they are there on the 'bias' thread for anyone to see.

However, I've no desire to go around the houses with you on this again.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

There is though a big difference between something from our own security sources, which has then been reviewed by Judges, and a public enquiry that the politicians want to use to kick something into the long grass. I accept the latter happens but have faith in the former.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.