This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Mar 24 8.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
I hope you are still wearing your mask it might stop half the BS transmission that comes out of your mouth. Coming from someone whose every word is bs that is quite obviously more of the same. It made me smile though. It’s standard Trump tactics, accusing your opponent of that you are guilty of yourself.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 06 Mar 24 8.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The purpose is clearly explained. It determines trends and is used internally. It is not intended to present an overall picture for external consumption and for use by sceptics with agendas. Those who refused vaccinations when the threat was high and the NHS in danger of being overwhelmed were indeed selfish, whether they worked for the NHS or not. These days only the vulnerable are receiving boosters so it makes some sense for the age group now known to be at a lower risk to step back. It doesn't make sense when the possibility exists that future vaccinations could be required when the finger-pointers will be back with accusations of selfishness.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 06 Mar 24 8.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Coming from someone whose every word is bs that is quite obviously more of the same. It made me smile though. It’s standard Trump tactics, accusing your opponent of that you are guilty of yourself. Obsessed with Trump you are. You did the exact same with your recent court case. That also made me smile.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Mar 24 8.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
It doesn't make sense when the possibility exists that future vaccinations could be required when the finger-pointers will be back with accusations of selfishness. Not for Covid. Any future pandemic would need to be assessed on its merits. If vaccination for all was required to ensure it was controlled then anyone refusing would, in my view, be selfish. I am perfectly sure that, as with the Covid vaccines, nothing would be released until the regulators were certain of its safety. You can be sure that most of the frontline health workers, who would be at direct risk, would not refuse. It’s clearly a different situation now. That wouldn’t stop the know it all pot stirrers trying to make waves of course but we’ll just have to work around them again.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Mar 24 9.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Obsessed with Trump you are. You did the exact same with your recent court case. That also made me smile. I don’t recall referencing Trump over that travesty but maybe. He does so much that’s wrong it’s easy to make connections that point up the failures of others. Actually you imitating Trump tactics, knowingly or not, is actually hilarious. He is frequently pathetic in his attempts to divert and delay.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 06 Mar 24 9.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not for Covid. Any future pandemic would need to be assessed on its merits. If vaccination for all was required to ensure it was controlled then anyone refusing would, in my view, be selfish. I am perfectly sure that, as with the Covid vaccines, nothing would be released until the regulators were certain of its safety. You can be sure that most of the frontline health workers, who would be at direct risk, would not refuse. It’s clearly a different situation now. That wouldn’t stop the know it all pot stirrers trying to make waves of course but we’ll just have to work around them again. They refused enough last time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 06 Mar 24 9.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t recall referencing Trump over that travesty but maybe. He does so much that’s wrong it’s easy to make connections that point up the failures of others. Actually you imitating Trump tactics, knowingly or not, is actually hilarious. He is frequently pathetic in his attempts to divert and delay. Just like yourself. Obsessed with Trump. You can't pass up an opportunity to bring him up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lombardinho London 07 Mar 24 6.41am | |
---|---|
From Sep'23
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Mar 24 9.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Just like yourself. Obsessed with Trump. You can't pass up an opportunity to bring him up. Obsessed? No. Concerned about the threat to western democratic values that he represents? Hugely so. He ought to remain in the front of everyone’s attention. He is dangerous.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 07 Mar 24 9.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Obsessed? No. Concerned about the threat to western democratic values that he represents? Hugely so. He ought to remain in the front of everyone’s attention. He is dangerous. He must be based on the number of unrelated threads he crops up in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 07 Mar 24 10.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
He must be based on the number of unrelated threads he crops up in. Precisely.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Mar 24 6.29pm | |
---|---|
That’s old news which has been fully covered. NHS staff are human and suffer the same doubts and susceptibility to misinformation as others. Less so the higher up the clinical ladder they are, but even there there were a few reluctant ones who did not want to participate, either because of age or concerns about the speed of the development.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.