You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 1.39pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 253 of 311 < 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 >

Topic Locked

Stirlingsays Flag 11 Apr 15 5.50pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 11 Apr 2015 5.19pm

Average constituency size in England estimated at c.72,000,in Scotland c.69,000.So,little difference between number of constituencies per national entity and population size.Why should a Scottish constituency within the UK parliament be worth any less in terms of legitimacy than an English one?

You appear to suggest when it suits you that within the UK (and I seem to recall you support the Union),it would be awful if the SNP had a block of say about 40 seats and thus formed a coalition since many would be disaffected and the Labour vote might experience "carnage".

Interestingly,I suspect if your wildest dreams came true and UKIP got a block of about 40 seats within the UK and formed a coalition with the Tories,you somehow wouldn't call it a disaster, "completely unfair" and a legitimate recipe for disaffection and that the Tory vote might thus experience "carnage".

All this scare story stuff about Labour and the SNP is no different to a similar such scare story about the Tories and UKIP should your wildest dream have taken off,and one which you would no doubt have condemned as the "usual lefty fear mongering nonsense".

Edited by legaleagle (11 Apr 2015 5.22pm)


I don't begrudge Scottish seats in parliament what I begrudge is Scottish nationalists holding power and having say over England by pact or coalition.....Which by far is the largest part of the union.

The Scottish moan about the reverse but here again it has to be said, they are a population of five/six million....It isn't really comparable in fairness.

Like I say, If this happened I would blame the Scottish voters more than anyone for essentially voting for a union break-away party in massive numbers.....And Labour but only if they took the deal....In my view it's probably better...If more chaotic to go with minority government, with eventually a re-vote.

When you compare the effect of voting for Ukip with the affect of voting for break-away nationalist upon the English population you are talking about two very different concepts Legal.

Ukip aren't anti the UK union....Ukip are a party that campaigns for a referendum on the EU. The English....And I'll repeat it. The English comprise of the vast majority of the UK and tax paid into it...The UK us broadly in favour of a referendum anyway......So your musings on the impact of Ukip having some minor say makes no sense.....Outside of the pro EU left who would hate it of course.

As for what outcome I'd like.....To be honest I'm voting Ukip because of my dislike of the framing of the freedom of movement laws and for how the EU is structured generally.....Also out of irritation of how the left and the Tories have treated Ukip generally.

I want a re-alignment of our relationship with the EU.....But outside of that I don't think there is an outcome that I'm too happy with anyway.

It's going to be a very hard five years whatever happens.

I can't stand Cameron.
I quite like somethings about Miliband but Labour generally usually cock things up.
Ukip.....There most important policies align with mine.
Lib Dems.....I usually find I'm opposed to most of their ideas.
Greens.....I was quite impressed with that Aussie bird in the debates (though why is an Aussie standing for a UK seat? Never mind)....Still most Green policies are ridiculous when subjected to serious analysis.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
legaleagle Flag 11 Apr 15 9.00pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Apr 2015 5.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 11 Apr 2015 5.19pm

Average constituency size in England estimated at c.72,000,in Scotland c.69,000.So,little difference between number of constituencies per national entity and population size.Why should a Scottish constituency within the UK parliament be worth any less in terms of legitimacy than an English one?

You appear to suggest when it suits you that within the UK (and I seem to recall you support the Union),it would be awful if the SNP had a block of say about 40 seats and thus formed a coalition since many would be disaffected and the Labour vote might experience "carnage".

Interestingly,I suspect if your wildest dreams came true and UKIP got a block of about 40 seats within the UK and formed a coalition with the Tories,you somehow wouldn't call it a disaster, "completely unfair" and a legitimate recipe for disaffection and that the Tory vote might thus experience "carnage".

All this scare story stuff about Labour and the SNP is no different to a similar such scare story about the Tories and UKIP should your wildest dream have taken off,and one which you would no doubt have condemned as the "usual lefty fear mongering nonsense".

Edited by legaleagle (11 Apr 2015 5.22pm)


I don't begrudge Scottish seats in parliament what I begrudge is Scottish nationalists holding power and having say over England by pact or coalition.....Which by far is the largest part of the union.

The Scottish moan about the reverse but here again it has to be said, they are a population of five/six million....It isn't really comparable in fairness.

Like I say, If this happened I would blame the Scottish voters more than anyone for essentially voting for a union break-away party in massive numbers.....And Labour but only if they took the deal....In my view it's probably better...If more chaotic to go with minority government, with eventually a re-vote.

When you compare the effect of voting for Ukip with the affect of voting for break-away nationalist upon the English population you are talking about two very different concepts Legal.

Ukip aren't anti the UK union....Ukip are a party that campaigns for a referendum on the EU. The English....And I'll repeat it. The English comprise of the vast majority of the UK and tax paid into it...The UK us broadly in favour of a referendum anyway......So your musings on the impact of Ukip having some minor say makes no sense.....Outside of the pro EU left who would hate it of course.

As for what outcome I'd like.....To be honest I'm voting Ukip because of my dislike of the framing of the freedom of movement laws and for how the EU is structured generally.....Also out of irritation of how the left and the Tories have treated Ukip generally.

I want a re-alignment of our relationship with the EU.....But outside of that I don't think there is an outcome that I'm too happy with anyway.

It's going to be a very hard five years whatever happens.

I can't stand Cameron.
I quite like somethings about Miliband but Labour generally usually cock things up.
Ukip.....There most important policies align with mine.
Lib Dems.....I usually find I'm opposed to most of their ideas.
Greens.....I was quite impressed with that Aussie bird in the debates (though why is an Aussie standing for a UK seat? Never mind)....Still most Green policies are ridiculous when subjected to serious analysis.


According to YouGov she has British nationality and has lived here for 15 years.She is an immigrant Stirling

You do strike me as coming across as primarily an English nationalist.Voters in Scotland have proportionately no greater or lesser sway over the outcome of a government than those in England.It all depends how you view it and what you view as the most objectionable outcome.For me a Tory/UKIP coalition government with UKIP holding the balance of power with say 40 seats would be it.For you,I guess it would be a Labour/SNP government government with the SNP holding 40 or so seats.

Edited by legaleagle (11 Apr 2015 9.04pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
imbored Flag UK 11 Apr 15 10.05pm

Quote legaleagle at 11 Apr 2015 9.00pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 11 Apr 2015 5.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 11 Apr 2015 5.19pm

Average constituency size in England estimated at c.72,000,in Scotland c.69,000.So,little difference between number of constituencies per national entity and population size.Why should a Scottish constituency within the UK parliament be worth any less in terms of legitimacy than an English one?

You appear to suggest when it suits you that within the UK (and I seem to recall you support the Union),it would be awful if the SNP had a block of say about 40 seats and thus formed a coalition since many would be disaffected and the Labour vote might experience "carnage".

Interestingly,I suspect if your wildest dreams came true and UKIP got a block of about 40 seats within the UK and formed a coalition with the Tories,you somehow wouldn't call it a disaster, "completely unfair" and a legitimate recipe for disaffection and that the Tory vote might thus experience "carnage".

All this scare story stuff about Labour and the SNP is no different to a similar such scare story about the Tories and UKIP should your wildest dream have taken off,and one which you would no doubt have condemned as the "usual lefty fear mongering nonsense".

Edited by legaleagle (11 Apr 2015 5.22pm)


I don't begrudge Scottish seats in parliament what I begrudge is Scottish nationalists holding power and having say over England by pact or coalition.....Which by far is the largest part of the union.

The Scottish moan about the reverse but here again it has to be said, they are a population of five/six million....It isn't really comparable in fairness.

Like I say, If this happened I would blame the Scottish voters more than anyone for essentially voting for a union break-away party in massive numbers.....And Labour but only if they took the deal....In my view it's probably better...If more chaotic to go with minority government, with eventually a re-vote.

When you compare the effect of voting for Ukip with the affect of voting for break-away nationalist upon the English population you are talking about two very different concepts Legal.

Ukip aren't anti the UK union....Ukip are a party that campaigns for a referendum on the EU. The English....And I'll repeat it. The English comprise of the vast majority of the UK and tax paid into it...The UK us broadly in favour of a referendum anyway......So your musings on the impact of Ukip having some minor say makes no sense.....Outside of the pro EU left who would hate it of course.

As for what outcome I'd like.....To be honest I'm voting Ukip because of my dislike of the framing of the freedom of movement laws and for how the EU is structured generally.....Also out of irritation of how the left and the Tories have treated Ukip generally.

I want a re-alignment of our relationship with the EU.....But outside of that I don't think there is an outcome that I'm too happy with anyway.

It's going to be a very hard five years whatever happens.

I can't stand Cameron.
I quite like somethings about Miliband but Labour generally usually cock things up.
Ukip.....There most important policies align with mine.
Lib Dems.....I usually find I'm opposed to most of their ideas.
Greens.....I was quite impressed with that Aussie bird in the debates (though why is an Aussie standing for a UK seat? Never mind)....Still most Green policies are ridiculous when subjected to serious analysis.


According to YouGov she has British nationality and has lived here for 15 years.She is an immigrant Stirling

You do strike me as coming across as primarily an English nationalist.Voters in Scotland have proportionately no greater or lesser sway over the outcome of a government than those in England.It all depends how you view it and what you view as the most objectionable outcome.For me a Tory/UKIP coalition government with UKIP holding the balance of power with say 40 seats would be it.For you,I guess it would be a Labour/SNP government government with the SNP holding 40 or so seats.

Edited by legaleagle (11 Apr 2015 9.04pm)

If this forum teaches you anything it's that people enjoy being pissed off and pointing the finger elsewhere. Whether they're Scottish, English or whatever. It's the way of the world. We use various mental gymnastics to comfort and convince ourselves that others are the problem. If you want an authentic life you have to look for the needles in the haystack and just find 'good people' which has nothing to do with nationality, disability, gender, sexuality, race, politics. Not people throwing their weight around or being overly political day to day. Just good people who see beyond the silly templates we place over communities and individuals.


Edited by imbored (11 Apr 2015 10.56pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 12 Apr 15 1.02am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Ah egalitarians and their world views.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
imbored Flag UK 12 Apr 15 1.16am

Quote Stirlingsays at 12 Apr 2015 1.02am

Ah egalitarians and their world views.


Are you saying that not believing disability, gender, sexuality, race should define a person's worth is somehow a flawed or lesser world view?

Edited by imbored (12 Apr 2015 1.19am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 12 Apr 15 1.22am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.16am

Are you saying that issues like not believing disability, gender, sexuality, race should define a person's worth is somehow a flawed or lesser world view?

It's not about disability, gender, sexuality or race.

It's about connection and common experience.....For example, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
imbored Flag UK 12 Apr 15 1.27am

Quote Stirlingsays at 12 Apr 2015 1.22am

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.16am

Are you saying that issues like not believing disability, gender, sexuality, race should define a person's worth is somehow a flawed or lesser world view?

It's not about disability, gender, sexuality or race.

It's about connection and common experience.....For example, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

Your own family members and friends may well fall into various groups including these so it's a bad analogy. You're immediately placing these groups as 'other than', people that you have to go out and find and experience that somehow aren't part and parcel of life by default.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 12 Apr 15 1.34am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.27am

Quote Stirlingsays at 12 Apr 2015 1.22am

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.16am

Are you saying that issues like not believing disability, gender, sexuality, race should define a person's worth is somehow a flawed or lesser world view?

It's not about disability, gender, sexuality or race.

It's about connection and common experience.....For example, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

Your own family members and friends may well fall into various groups including these so it's a bad analogy. You're immediately placing these groups as 'other than', people that you have to go out and find and experience that somehow aren't part and parcel of life by default.



It doesn't matter if your family members or friends fall into any particular group you mentioned as it isn't about that.

Like I said it's about connection and common experience.

So like I said, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

You see where I'm going with this.....And hence maybe why I regard egalitarianism as a limited though noble tool....But a conceptual tool that is frequently not examined by those who use it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Apr 2015 1.35am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
imbored Flag UK 12 Apr 15 1.48am

Quote Stirlingsays at 12 Apr 2015 1.34am

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.27am

Quote Stirlingsays at 12 Apr 2015 1.22am

Quote imbored at 12 Apr 2015 1.16am

Are you saying that issues like not believing disability, gender, sexuality, race should define a person's worth is somehow a flawed or lesser world view?

It's not about disability, gender, sexuality or race.

It's about connection and common experience.....For example, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

Your own family members and friends may well fall into various groups including these so it's a bad analogy. You're immediately placing these groups as 'other than', people that you have to go out and find and experience that somehow aren't part and parcel of life by default.



It doesn't matter if your family members or friends fall into any particular group you mentioned as it isn't about that.

Like I said it's about connection and common experience.

So like I said, do you regard a stranger you have never met as important to you as a family member?

You see where I'm going with this.....And hence maybe why I regard egalitarianism as a limited though noble tool....But a conceptual tool that is frequently not examined by those who use it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Apr 2015 1.35am)

It very much matters. If a family member is disabled you're likely to develop an understanding of those challenges and so on. Groups aren't outside of our everyday experience, they are part of our every day life.

You said 'Ah egalitarians and their world views' as if my outlook was somehow lesser. You're free to believe that, but you love your own family because you know them, that appears to be your point. Therefore appreciating others rather than side stepping them is actually a way to acknowledge that process. We're all free to ignore that, and to varying degrees we do, but it reduces the reality of who people are and replaces it with the most convenient caricature to hand.


Edited by imbored (12 Apr 2015 2.37am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Apr 15 7.59pm

Disabled unborn? Abort him/her!
[Link]

What a lovely man.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
TUX Flag redhill 13 Apr 15 10.24pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Apr 2015 7.59pm

Disabled unborn? Abort him/her!
[Link]

What a lovely man.

This rings a sad bell.
Around 18months ago my best mate (also called Geoff) and his wife chose to terminate due to 'Downs'.
They're both in their 40's and for what it's worth, many would view them as the perfect couple. They already have 2 lovely healthy children, a boy of 9 and a girl of 6.
A third, as planned, came along but they saw the results of a scan.
Rather than giving him a chance, they chose to kill their third child because he wasn't 'perfect'.

We don't talk as much as we used to.


Edited by TUX (13 Apr 2015 10.25pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
imbored Flag UK 13 Apr 15 11.13pm

Quote TUX at 13 Apr 2015 10.24pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Apr 2015 7.59pm

Disabled unborn? Abort him/her!
[Link]

What a lovely man.

This rings a sad bell.
Around 18months ago my best mate (also called Geoff) and his wife chose to terminate due to 'Downs'.
They're both in their 40's and for what it's worth, many would view them as the perfect couple. They already have 2 lovely healthy children, a boy of 9 and a girl of 6.
A third, as planned, came along but they saw the results of a scan.
Rather than giving him a chance, they chose to kill their third child because he wasn't 'perfect'.

We don't talk as much as we used to.


Edited by TUX (13 Apr 2015 10.25pm)


It's got to be said, UKIP don't half attract more than their fair share of candidates with bottom of the barrel views.

Edited by imbored (13 Apr 2015 11.14pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 253 of 311 < 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic